Search results

The only camp we will head to is the Anti-China camp.

This was not the first incident that made India see China as the enemy. If by occupying some land, you thought India would change its stance or thought India could be taught a lesson, you and or China are very wrong. Relationships grow stronger with talks not by grabbing land at dark.

So is it ok for Indian soldiers to carry bullets for a gun? Assuming the bullets will have to be stored somewhere - we have no way to defend it.

PDF Fan boys are expecting India to consult with them before even artillery purchase. This has to be the pits for this forum for even letting this thread go on. Given the situation India finds itself, it will purchase based on its own need, current context and its own money! Back to topic...

If that is the case it has backfired. The Indian sentiment, particularly of the common man has changed forever. This will lead to more aggressive China-specific weapons procurement and a stronger anti-China stance in world affairs. This does not make sense since one expects China to have known...

Thanks! next time just post the video you really dont have to take the trouble of making screen shots. Dumb media of ours as usual!

Could it be that the really dumb have to keep up a facade of being intelligent while exposing their stupidity even more? Hence the video and the thread?

Do you have a link to the video? the pics look photoshopped. They have a youtube channel shouldn't be hard for people who keep track of India media 24/7 to find it..

That's your view. What we saw was a military that was so nervous that it purposely dropped bombs in no-man's land that was laughable and an airforce that would not cross a certain boundary. On our side we saw a brave airmen take the fight into enemy territory. He was shot down yes but we know we...

When one side seemed to be testing its luck by firing from a distance that had zero effect. IAF's plan was to wait and watch you exhaust all your fire works before getting closer and firing for a kill. Alas, your pilots found out too soon and retreated.

What Hype? It could not shoot down any aircraft from that distance. What it showed however was that PAF pilots did not want to come any where close to get a better shot at IAF planes in turn wasting a few super expensive BVRs. India's training is different, we don't fire and hope something gets...

Even if Pakistan wanted, There is no way India will ever unit with Pakistan. This man does not know the newer generation in India. We are separate people who do not want to have anything connected with Pakistan. As people our achievements, our pride and where we want to be is diametrically...

Of course any news even barely suggesting something against the Chinese is fake news! not reliable!

If Pakistan could, it wouldn't keep asking the rest of the world to help save Kashmir. https://dawn.com/news/3000997/FM-Qureshi-urges-OIC-to-step-up-efforts-for-lasting-solution-to-Kashmir-issue I know that would do nothing to even engage a debate in the fantasy land existing here but I had to...

Lol! thats a lot of time you guys spend on twitter following Indians! :rolleyes1:

Serious lapse here. I think that action should always rest with the captain of the flight. ATC usually will not speak when a plan is about to land, touched down or taking off. Maybe there are suggesting he could have informed the pilot that he/she observed the engines touching the ground...

See the nervous pacing around of the Chinese soldiers before the fist fight begins. They are taking steps backwards once they know they have to start a fist fight. They look very nervous but have to follow orders to throw some punches around. All those reports of Chinese having no real conflict...

That's what I thought also but that statement seems to suggest otherwise. Can you help me understand that statement please.

What?? do air traffic controllers give commands for a go-around in Pakistan? Or may be I did not understand this statement. Somebody please clarify.

When it comes to India-US relation it is not about one person. It's people-2-people relations and opportunities. Republican, Democrats, Modi, Rahul do not change the equation.