Search results

You are entirely missing the point by insisting and rewriting you're 'arguments'. That's why the soup's hit the fan and in your face. Just stop with the psuedoaphorisms go read more and come back with better knowledge. Don't worry we're softies ( 😆 ). Yes the sky is blue and no they do not have...

I understand your perspective. However, not sure the resistance economy is promoting competition or monopolies. As an exercise, can you exclude these terms and make your points again without them? The resulting modification might indeed shed light on what are fixes, suggestions, or best...

True. But using western capitalist terminology is false as well. Nothing there to imitate or learn from. Nothing that maps to the Iranian burgeoning resistance economy. Both ‘capitalism’ and ‘communism’ are synthetic constructs that have failed mightily in practice if not in theory.

Nothing to admit. There is no viable and indigenous weapons industry. There is no ‘industry’. Period.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-19/iran-nuclear-inspectors-detect-uranium-enriched-to-84-purity?leadSource=uverify%20wall

@neutrino s analysis that concludes Iranian underground facilities (especially Fordow) are indeed vulnerable given a sufficient size of a nuclear strike:

No I understood your post. Mine is asymptotically agreeing with it.

I disagree simulation with a tape measure is enough. However, a CAD based simulation might have been sufficient. Separately, how has this been determined as a ‘mock-up’ in the first place? For me the first reference to a mock-up I read was via the Meshkat channel.

Ghaher to be revealed as UCAV ‘middle of next year’. Systems are complete. Currently customizing to meet the requirements of two branches of the armed forces: