What's new

Search results

  1. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Here it is ... https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/indians-working-in-mill-run-by-nawaz-sharifs-family-pak-opposition-leader-1456881 Related... https://tribune.com.pk/story/587331/solving-energy-crisis-indian-firms-to-manufacture-power-packs-in-pakistan
  2. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Also there is one captive power plant ran on bagasse, the sugarcane residue started by Sharif, and with a large number of Indians posted in the plant located somewhere in south Punjab, gave the visas through favors and overruled the process.
  3. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Not important, end result matters, classified information was shared with India by Benazir, briefed by intelligence agencies as head of state.
  4. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Yes but balkanization of Pakistan is a feasible project for India, Nawaz sharif, Bhutto and yours kith and kin. Bhutto narcissist thought led to BD parting ways, idher hum udhar Tum ides. Nawaz is a spineless, gutless, subservient lapdog of India, US and west, wagging the tail nonstop.
  5. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Benazir gave India the details about indian Punjab fighters called the khalistani fighters, this was documented and reported. And when India was harboring all the anti Pakistan elements in Afghanistan and India. Both Bhutto and Sharif clans are traitors, it's not that they are just corrupt and...
  6. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    You didn't get it, or knowingly not accepting it, IK has said with Modi having the support of Indians, he can go about getting the relations better, as he won't be pressurized by the internal elements. And IK said he lend a hand of friendship to Modi but he wasn't interested and took it as our...
  7. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Great minds read and write books, Nawaz sharif being a petty minded, vengeful, revenge seeking person will always talk about the next meal to be served. As he said brain is not important, pait is, when doctors said his brain arteries are clogged.
  8. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Lost count how many times IK tweeted about Modi being the RSS pick, mentored by the parent RSS, the anti Muslim and anti Pakistan extremist Hindutva party. Umpteenth times IK has written against the fascist, supremacist ideology of Modi, BJP, people came to knew about Hindutva, the RSS, the...
  9. N.Siddiqui

    Asia cup is total disrespect to Pakistan and world cricket by indian BCCI.

    India will get away with all the money as the host country has the broadcasting rights. And Pakistan players would be under pressure by the Hindutva to loose matches, through bookies and betting, on the ground Pakistan players would be insulted, heckled by the Hindutva spectators. It had...
  10. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    The common denominator between @El Sidd, the closet patwari and the indians. The love for Nawaz sharif and Sharif family, knowing fully the corruption and devastation they caused to the country. Here it can be attributed to khota biryani, but Indians don't eat meat and for that matter khota...
  11. N.Siddiqui

    Asia cup is total disrespect to Pakistan and world cricket by indian BCCI.

    Pakistan shouldn't be hoping and asking for any policy change. It's an internal matter of India, right or wrong. Pakistan need to go with it's own reciprocal policy and need to show some spine.
  12. N.Siddiqui

    Asia cup is total disrespect to Pakistan and world cricket by indian BCCI.

    Pakistan need to show some spine and do the reciprocal, not playing in India. Initially PCB chairman rameez talked about it, but after the regime change new subservient chairman is in place. India policy is wrong and based on political hatred, but Pakistan pandering is equally awful. Simply...
  13. N.Siddiqui

    Asia cup is total disrespect to Pakistan and world cricket by indian BCCI.

    Reeks of hypocrisy...a political gimmick of hatred for Pakistan translating into electoral brownie points for the BJP, Modi. If India doesn't want to play with Pakistan, why it is playing on neutral, other venues than Pakistan. It's a policy of unbridled hatred, devoid of any common sense...
  14. N.Siddiqui

    Asia cup is total disrespect to Pakistan and world cricket by indian BCCI.

    Yes exactly my point, they should be separated. Sports and politics should be separated, rather.
  15. N.Siddiqui

    Asia cup is total disrespect to Pakistan and world cricket by indian BCCI.

    It's mostly about the money, if played in Pakistan with India taking part, the host Pakistan sports channels would have been getting the main broadcasting rights and PCB getting the big money, the indian channel would be acting as subsidiaries and second fiddle, with less income for BCCI. And...
  16. N.Siddiqui

    Asia cup is total disrespect to Pakistan and world cricket by indian BCCI.

    BCCI head Jay Shah is Son of Taklu Amit Shah, Modi main pick and a Hindutvadi, a Pakistan Hater...and in doing so they have got it, the Karma. Destroyed the Indian cricket with BJP politics, the Pakistan hatred in the game. India BJP main point was Pakistan should not gain financially by...
  17. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    If, only if the military establishment was working for the government, working for the people and country as per rules assigned under constitution of Pakistan, the US wouldn't be able to contact military directly, and force and coerce the chief by threat, carrot and stick. Only if they were...
Back
Top Bottom