3 is okay as PLAN need to fill the decks with WZ-10/19/20, marines, hovercraft, LSU, amphibious assault vehicles, etc that require time to build too. Building too fast will end up having empty ships. The focus is more on completing aircraft carriers along with carrier based fighters to provide...
You watched this too? I yawned numbers of times and skipped when watching. Narration is dull, don't know why narrators of China documentaries like to lower tone and mumbling thinking that it's stylish to do so. Back in older days narrators would narrate in fun or exciting presentation, not like...
PLAN having electronic warfare jamming J-15D will be good advantage to counter threat of EF-18G jamming. Missile and radar effectiveness will be reduced under ECM jamming as shown in Iraq and Serbia war. Iraqi mirage F1, Mig-25, Mig-29, mig-23 could only get the medium range missiles to work...
Seems like you're the only 1 left still don't understand simple English despite explanation simplified to very basic point form. Aren't you the stupid then? What is your primary language, I'll use google translate now. I stated clearly the spokesperson claim and goal not going to happen. Please...
US ATF requirements included for US Navy fighters, do you know why there is no navalized F-22 until now? The navalized F-22 with strengthened landing gear and arrestor hook could easily take off but the landing part is the main issue as the F-22 approaches too fast. if Sukhoi claimed SU-57 could...
PLAAF is air force while Type 003, J-15 belong to navy PLAN.
SU-57 is not designed for carrier landing and would require partial or total redesign to have low speed stability which can only be done by Russian so not possible. Su-57 is single seat stealth fighter so it can't be trainer.
China...
Right Deino, you too take care
That could be the point, articles usually said it in general repeating what spokesperson said. There sure are lots of testing and trials being conducted by then. J-15B, KJ-600, J-35 would have to queue up for trials and testing on Type 003.
Most likely will since it could take off from Type 003. ASW and transport
It sure will for separate ASW and transport variants.
H-20 will it look like B-2 flying wing or more of large fighter-bomber since the designer evaluated the B-1R with AESA and air to air capable besides being bomber...
There probably won't be twin seater based J-10C until numbers of existing J-10AS/ASH trainers are no longer fit to fly requiring replacement. Or when more combat trainers required. If J-10A based twin seat trainers cheaper and convenient to build, then Chengdu scrap the plan for J-10C based twin...
China requires more long range multi-role fighters for offensive operations more than home defense J-10C. That's the only bottleneck. J-16, J-15B, J-20B they all have combat radius 900 miles or higher ideal for defending China borders taking the fight further out away from shores.
I didn't say you are wrong nor disagree with you. Since you have English issue, I'll use point form.
June or July 2020 - I read on newspaper and magazine military article that the PLAN or manufacturer spokesperson said they will complete the Type 003 carrier by year end or early next year to...
I have already mentioned the spokesperson's goal not going to realize looking at the latest photo on Type 003 development. What argument are you referring to?
You and Deino have problem understanding English?
I read articles but don't remember the spokesperson name. Every time China military officers or manufacturer engineers released public info, I don't really memorize names but skipped straight to contents of latest news. Like recent numbers of articles said China must reverse engineer all...
Based on the articles I read, the military spokesperson said in his statement that J-15 will stay as PLAN conventional weapons platform for air to air and air to ground. He added that J-15B with AESA, WS10 would serve on new aircraft carriers with EMALS. Optronic FLIR targeting pod can be...
Not the writer but the spokesperson who came up with the statement. Based on the latest photo on type003 development, all I can say is that spokesperson statement not going to realize. 2 to 2.5 years away to go is really some time to go. Can KJ600 take off from Type 002 without catapult launch...