What's new

Search results

  1. Cy-27

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Graph, USAF has done a number of tests on this very topic, and while I will not discuss specifics, in almost every instance it comes down to the skill of a person behind the stick. (And weapons payload.) Again, this doesn't mean I would volunteer to fight against an inept pilot in a F-22A...
  2. Cy-27

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Even with its current radar and sensors I would not want to be facing a squadron of professionally flown, data-linked JF-17s armed with (big emphasis here!) proper BVR and ASRAAM missiles. Particularly with effective AEW cover. I am not a psychologist, so I am not qualified to speak on the...
  3. Cy-27

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Luftwaffe, I agree that this is the only rational way to proceed for PAF. My question was posed to those in this forum who advocate a purchase of a smaller number of 'more advanced' machinery.
  4. Cy-27

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    To those who propose replacing an order of 250 JF-17s with a smaller quantity of euro-canards: given Pakistan's defense-oriented posture, perhaps your ACM tactics are far superior to what I've been taught, but how does one stop an onslaught of enemy aircraft penetrating Pakistan's airspace in...
  5. Cy-27

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Here's my unsolicited quasi-professional (pilot) opinion on the JF: Great bird. And its capabilities have only been scratched. Look at the earlier blocks of F-16, it is a completely different bird from the current block 60, with latest models possessing capabilities that a legacy F-16 pilot...
Back
Top Bottom