Search results

Yes, common sense tells us that China clearly won the Vietnam/china war, China took multiple islands, took northern Vietnamese territory for decades, and china marched all the way to Hanoi. If that's a loss, China will take that loss each and every day. :lol: Looks like your fake made up...

so you can't provide any counter argument, and essentially by saying being a veteran somehow makes your assessment "objective"? By your logic, there are tons of Chinese foot soldier who fought in Vietnam would have much better standing than you are in terms of their assessment. China took...

Stating china "lost" to vietnam immediately invalidated your so called "objective assessment", it was only right wing propaganda at most. During China / Vietnam war, Chinese troops went all the way to Hanoi before retreating, took back multiple islands which china still controlling and...

china never even trained Iraqis, in fact, China and Iraq weren't even friends when US invaded.

Remember Indian moon lander crashed a couple years ago. Indian world wide declared it was 99% success and congratulated each other for it. I bet they say this mission was 99.999% success as well.

An Indian Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle tumbled out of control five minutes after liftoff Wednesday when the rocket’s cryogenic upper stage failed to ignite, destroying a long-delayed Earth observation spacecraft and ending a streak of 16 straight successful Indian space launches. The...

Thank God a spy is caught.

Makes you wonder what kind of inferior US "trainings" have been provided to Afghanistan the whole time. American trained Afghan troops vs. Afghan trained Taliban, American trained South Vietnamese vs. Vietnamese trained North Vietnamese, American trained South Korean vs. Korean trained North...

typical Aussie media. There were few trolls and nationalists who abused taiwan athletes and celebrities, but of course Aussie media intentionally made the title "china" infuriated.

independent judicial system where criminals walk free, and US is basically a war zone where massacres happening on the daily basis? Does American judicial system protect its citizens at all?

On the day of democracy uprising by Trump supporters on the capital hill, 5 were immediately dead, 1 dead protester was shot by American police. Afterwards, hundreds of the democratic protesters were branded as "domestic terrorists" and arrested by FBI. Talk about human rights abuse.

what makes you think " crimes against humanity and genocide, as well as WMD development programs, the accused has to prove their innocence"? Does that mean others can accuse you with lies constantly, and you have to constantly prove innocence? Guess what, countries like US will never bother to...

no, you are wrong, only the accused has to provide evidence. If accuser can't provide evidence to prove the other party is guilty, even if the accused sits on his butt the whole time without doing anything, then the accused still walks free. That's the bedrock of "presumption of innocence", you...

accuser providing evidence is the bedrock of every country's legal system, it's not crazy, it's the norm. US sanctioned UN court judges for investigating US massive war crimes, and it blocked any investigation into its crime, so china will not take US seriously when US asks China to open it...

There are tons of pictures and videos of Palestinian being bombed to dust by Israel using American provided bombs, while there hasn't been a single dead body US can provide as proof of so called "Uyghur genocide". Besides Xinjiang is a tourist hotspot, tons of foreign and Chinese tourist go...

so US treating China like an enemy can level any sort of vicious accusation at china, and china has to prove itself innocent? No, it doesn't work this way, the party making the accusation has to provide evidence, otherwise US can constantly make vicious accusation against china, and China has to...

so again, there's no evidence. Just like claiming Chinese "genocide", but US to date can't show one single dead person attributable to the so called "genocide".

"First hand", why doesn't this person show his/her torture injuries? Why can't US media just even take a photo of the "torture injuries" from the person they interviewed?

what do you expect Japan will say? The minute it says otherwise, US will regime change, the implicit coercion from the US is apparent.

anything heard from another person is second hand, show one picture of dead body first, show one picture of torture injuries first.