No. Gliding is NOT flying. Birds do not glide, they fly. Gliding is just a subset of flight. Flying is about overpowering the restraints from gravity and drag. Gliders do not do that. That is why gliders and flyers are separated.
Nothing you said address the issue on what the Arabs can do if enough Palestinians CHOOSE to exit Gaza. All it takes is merely %10 for the rest of the general population to begin thinking of their own affairs, as in the cost-benefits analysis of staying or leaving. Screaming...
Not a damned thing.
No, the US will not 'force' any neighboring countries to take in the Palestinians. But what the US can do is somehow make it attractive for them to do so. What? We do not know for now. But the reality is that if enough Palestinians CHOOSE to leave Gaza for greener pastures...
No, DOGE is moving as fast as NORMAL businesses does. And that is what entrenched government employees do not like. Senators and Representatives are protected by their congressional terms, 2 yrs and 6 yrs. But what DOGE is doing is what normal businesses do everyday, especially after a corporate...
Canada is already our unofficial 51st state. I joked about it to our Canadian friends at a Maple Flag exercise decades ago and they laughed. They were not offended. They knew.
That is true. I think this is the first time any country land a rocket vertically. This means China would be the first country to create a reusable spaceship. China is indeed 'ahead' of US.
We got ours, and you got yours. Does not matter if the poopers are children or not. If anything, it is even worse that it is Chinese children who are street poopers because it means their parents are fine with it. Whereas, our street poopers are people with mental health issues and at least that...
Just go along with him, that the PLAN is superior to the USN in every way. It is his mission here on PDF to knock US down whenever he can find sources on the internet.
Yeah...I knew you would bring that up. I did the keyword search for 'years' and found the relevant passages.
That passage does not mean the US called 16 yrs old males as combatants as stated in the abstract.
In 2012, The New York Times reported that the Obama Administration excluded all...
First, I do not do paywalled sources. SEcond, where in your source does it say that the US declared males 16 yrs and older are legitimate military targets? Am open minded.