Dragon Ball

My God!! You are really a thing!! Good night.

My position about few things is clear. The cases of temple desecration and forced conversion may not be true everywhere. I don't deny they happened, just I am skeptic about their generalization. RSS version of history is full of loopholes and completely unscientific. Dating of Ramayana or Mahabharata is plain stupidity without rational historiography and methodical research. If that makes me anti-Hindu, let it be.

That was my second and last post in that thread. In the first, I asked why just this book, why not the others which have sexual contents about Hindu Gods. See, how prejudiced you are.

This is what I wrote in the last.

"Rest what she has written about Hindu God's and the implications she extracted out does not need any comments. Because the whole featherbrained interpretations are all her own and while reading this it is amply clear that she have not read or researched well about the Upanishadas, the Puranas and Bhagabat Geeta as well. It's all are school boyish explanations she had made and deserve the least attention and remark."

Huh!! I defended her scholarship!! I just wrote only one long post in that thread, if I remember correctly.

The Bengali factor was brought in by a poster unnecessarily. And I was not angry, rather amused at his usual foolishness. Muslims are not necessarily good and Hindus are bad in my book. I was equally outraged by Wendy Doniger's book just as you would have been. I may not agree with Koenraad Elst's version of history always, but that does not make me an essentially Hindu hater.

I never attack on Hindus, are you really serious? Had you read my posts on Hinduism that I used to post like an idiot when I was new in this forum, you would not have said that. But leave it. U can say what ever u want abt Bengalis. I hv grown a thicker skin. Ha ha.

Easy, ma'am. Easy. Don't be so serious. I don't hate a Hindu nationalist. Just can't bear when my ethnicity is attacked.