What's new

Enough with democracy, welcome martial law?

batmannow

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
18,830
Reaction score
-19
Country
United States
Location
Thailand
ENOUGH with DEMOCRAZY, WELLCOME MARTIAL LAW!
Dear friends,
Its about time, we should stop wasting our emotions, our taxes, our lives to this stupid , shamefull, croupted , lawlessnes kind of DEMOCRAZY!
Instead , we should wellcome local bodies Made ,civil-army basseD , revolutionized martail-law.
Because in 64 years of the , history of pakistan, it was our , 3 patriotic genrls who devloped our country , our politicians allways brought us, shame.
Don't troll, & don't let anyone troll!
Compare & discuss the subject, with power to listen others!
Good luck , & thanks!
 
ENOUGH with DEMOCRAZY, WELLCOME MARTIAL LAW!
Dear friends,
Its about time, we should stop wasting our emotions, our taxes, our lives to this stupid , shamefull, croupted , lawlessnes kind of DEMOCRAZY!
Instead , we should wellcome local bodies Made ,civil-army basseD , revolutionized martail-law.
Because in 64 years of the , history of pakistan, it was our , 3 patriotic genrls who devloped our country , our politicians allways brought us, shame.
Don't troll, & don't anyone troll!
Compare & discuss the subject, with power to listen others!
Good luck , & thanks!

I'm in favour.

Democracy has given us murder, corruption, sectarian violence, killings, rapings, Political mafias, gangsters, ect.


Pakistanis behave like animals, and the only way to contain them is military dictatorship.

To hell with democrazy.
 
So, you guys will rotate between democracy and martial law.
When martial law will suck, you will cry how democracy is wonderful, how you have right to democracy and freedom like others and blah blah.

In the process, no institution will be allowed to build (institutions are like trees, the longer they remain, the stronger and mature they become).
No wonder, even your judiciary is a joke.
 
I would really like to see a survey done in Pakistan regarding which system of governance they want . I won't be surprised if most say martial law , although Pakistan would be one of the few countries to prefer Military rule over democracy .
 
Well, the western democracy CANNOT work in Pakistan, that's for sure, we need something which suits us, the system based on Khilafat e Rashida, the spiritual democracy that Iqbal talked about.

I am all in favour of a Presidential form of government, like the Caliphate, you can give it any name, but the basis should be the Islamic ones, that's what suits us. If we give our public the ultimate choice to choose people, then we'll have the mess again like we had in 90s and like we have NOW.
 
ENOUGH with DEMOCRAZY, WELLCOME MARTIAL LAW!
Dear friends,
Its about time, we should stop wasting our emotions, our taxes, our lives to this stupid , shamefull, croupted , lawlessnes kind of DEMOCRAZY!
Yes, you need democracy, not DEMOCRAZY. For Pakistan is, in my opinion, a military junta slightly balanced by the courts with an obscuring smear of democracy. What the Pakmil wants done gets done and elected officials serve and wield authority at its pleasure.

Don't confuse DEMOCRAZY with democracy! Work for the real thing!
 
A Brief History of Pakistani Economy 1947-2010


Pakistani economy grew at a fairly impressive rate of 6 percent per year through the first four decades of the nation's existence. In spite of rapid population growth during this period, per capita incomes doubled, inflation remained low and poverty declined from 46% down to 18% by late 1980s, according to eminent Pakistani economist Dr. Ishrat Husain. This healthy economic performance was maintained through several wars and successive civilian and military governments in 1950s, 60s, 70s and 80s until the decade of 1990s, now appropriately remembered as the lost decade.

In the 1990s, economic growth plummeted to between 3% and 4%, poverty rose to 33%, inflation was in double digits and the foreign debt mounted to nearly the entire GDP of Pakistan as the governments of Benazir Bhutto (PPP) and Nawaz Sharif (PML) played musical chairs. Before Sharif was ousted in 1999, the two parties had presided over a decade of corruption and mismanagement. In 1999 Pakistan’s total public debt as percentage of GDP was the highest in South Asia – 99.3 percent of its GDP and 629 percent of its revenue receipts, compared to Sri Lanka (91.1% & 528.3% respectively in 1998) and India (47.2% & 384.9% respectively in 1998). Internal Debt of Pakistan in 1999 was 45.6 per cent of GDP and 289.1 per cent of its revenue receipts, as compared to Sri Lanka (45.7% & 264.8% respectively in 1998) and India (44.0% & 358.4% respectively in 1998).

After a relatively peaceful but economically stagnant decade of the 1990s, the year 1999 brought a bloodless coup led by General Pervez Musharraf, ushering in an era of accelerated economic growth that led to more than doubling of the national GDP, and dramatic expansion in Pakistan's urban middle class.
Pakistan became one of the four fastest growing economies in the Asian region during 2000-07 with its growth averaging 7.0 per cent per year for most of this period. As a result of strong economic growth, Pakistan succeeded in reducing poverty by one-half, creating almost 13 million jobs, halving the country's debt burden, raising foreign exchange reserves to a comfortable position and propping the country's exchange rate, restoring investors' confidence and most importantly, taking Pakistan out of the IMF Program.

The above facts were acknowledged by the current PPP government in a Memorandum of Economic and Financial Policies (MEFP) for 2008/09-2009/10, while signing agreement with the IMF on November 20, 2008. The document clearly (but grudgingly) acknowledged that "Pakistan's economy witnessed a major economic transformation in the last decade. The country's real GDP increased from $60 billion to $170 billion, with per capita income rising from under $500 to over $1000 during 2000-07". It further acknowledged that "the volume of international trade increased from $20 billion to nearly $60 billion. The improved macroeconomic performance enabled Pakistan to re-enter the international capital markets in the mid-2000s. Large capital inflows financed the current account deficit and contributed to an increase in gross official reserves to $14.3 billion at end-June 2007. Buoyant output growth, low inflation, and the government's social policies contributed to a reduction in poverty and improvement in many social indicators". (see MEFP, November 20, 2008, Para 1)

The decade also cast a huge shadow of the US "war on terror" on Pakistan, eventually turning the nation into a frontline state in the increasingly deadly conflict that shows no signs of abating. Along with the blood and gore and chaos on the streets, there are hopeful signs that rule of law and accountability is beginning to prevail in the country with the restoration of representative democracy and independent judiciary, largely in response to an increasingly assertive urban middle class, vibrant mass media and growing civil society.
The Zardari-Gilani government inherited a relatively sound economy on March 31, 2008. It inherited foreign exchange reserves of $13.3 billion, exchange rate at Rs62.76 per US dollar, the KSE index at 15,125 with market capitalization at $74 billion, inflation at 20.6 per cent and the country's debt burden on a declining path. The government itself acknowledged in the same document that "the macroeconomic situation deteriorated significantly in 2007/08 and the first four months of 2008/09 owing to adverse security developments, large exogenous price shocks (oil and food), global financial turmoil, and policy inaction during the political transition to the new government". (Para 3 of the MEFP, November 20, 2008.

Why is it that Pakistani economy has done well under military governments and performed poorly when led by politicians? To put it all in perspective, let's recall how late Dr. Mahbub ul-Haq, the renowned Pakistani economist who is credited with the idea of UNDP's human development index (HDI), explained the corrosive impact of political patronage on economic policy in Pakistan.

In a 10/12/1988 interview with Professor Anatol Lieven of King's College and quoted in a recent book "Pakistan-A Hard Country", here is what Dr. Haq said:

"..every time a new political government comes in they have to distribute huge amounts of state money and jobs as rewards to politicians who have supported them, and short term populist measures to try to convince the people that their election promises meant something, which leaves nothing for long-term development. As far as development is concerned, our system has all the worst features of oligarchy and democracy put together.

That is why only technocratic, non-political governments in Pakistan have ever been able to increase revenues. But they can not stay in power for long because they have no political support...For the same reason we have not been able to deregulate the economy as much as I wanted, despite seven years of trying, because the politicians and officials both like the system Bhutto (Late Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto) put in place. It suits them both very well, because it gave them lots of lucrative state-sponsored jobs in industry and banking to take for themselves or distribute to their relatives and supporters."

Go to hell, democrazy in pakistan!

Yes, you need democracy, not DEMOCRAZY. For Pakistan is, in my opinion, a military junta slightly balanced by the courts with an obscuring smear of democracy. What the Pakmil wants done gets done and elected officials serve and wield authority at its pleasure.

Don't confuse DEMOCRAZY with democracy! Work for the real thing!
Come to pakistan, & live in pakistan, thn you will know why its, called democrazy! In pakistan.
 
Come to pakistan, & live in pakistan, thn you will why its, democrazy!
If you think I'm missing something I'm sure you're a skilled enough writer to educate me.
 
I am in favor of a Chinese political system which has successfully changed and improved life standard of 1.3 billion people. If it works for them, it certainly should work for 180 million Pakistanis.

Well, the Chinese system was designed specifically for one country, that is China.

I don't think it will work in any other country.

I think it might be a good idea for Pakistan to try and emulate aspects of our "economic" system. However, I don't think our "political" system will work well in Pakistan.
 
ENOUGH with DEMOCRAZY, WELLCOME MARTIAL LAW!
Dear friends,
Its about time, we should stop wasting our emotions, our taxes, our lives to this stupid , shamefull, croupted , lawlessnes kind of DEMOCRAZY!
Instead , we should wellcome local bodies Made ,civil-army basseD , revolutionized martail-law.
Because in 64 years of the , history of pakistan, it was our , 3 patriotic genrls who devloped our country , our politicians allways brought us, shame.
Don't troll, & don't let anyone troll!
Compare & discuss the subject, with power to listen others!
Good luck , & thanks!

Well if you notice all the Generals were blessed by America and the aid was given to each of them. They always remained under the blessings of the United States and the US used them howsoever they preferred. Even the pathetic law of NRO was introduced by the former General.

While the democratic government were busy in pulling each other's legs but still managed to strengthen the foreign policy and believe it or not but the PPP's foreign policy is much more stronger and effective comparing to Musharraf's foreign policy however I agree to the fact that the condition of the country was much better during the military rule and that is due to various reasons. America was always there to take care of Pakistan as long as the Generals didn't put any hurdle in her goals.

I would still prefer Democratic set up in the future as we have never let the Democratic government work so far... Let the change come through the political process and not by the force of power.
 
The last politician (though i dislike him very much) who talked about "islamic socialism" and rebuilding bridges with SU was hanged... and the last dick-tator mush (i liked his economic policies) made us join the suicidal WOT.

How about letting democrazy run its course and "maybe" refine itself... I think judiciary should be made stronger... in order to deal with these politicoz! .... if they can send Gillani the scumbag packing .... im sure they can wipe out other corrupt dogs aswell!
 
Back
Top Bottom