What's new

US fears vulnerability may force Pakistan deeper into debt

ghazi52

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
101,792
Reaction score
106
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
,.,.,.

US fears vulnerability may force Pakistan deeper into debt

Anwar Iqbal
April 29, 2023

WASHINGTON: Increasing vulnerability will force Pakistan deeper into debt, speakers at a seminar on US-Pakistan relations argued while urging Washington to help Islamabad rebuild its ailing economy.

The seminar — organised jointly by Wilson Centre, Washington, and the International Academy of Letters (IAL), USA — tried to explore how to promote US- Pakistan relations after the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan.

Speakers stressed the need to transform the security-oriented relationship between the two countries into an economic and trade partnership beneficial for both.

“The traditional military-to-military ties are just one pillar of the relationship,” said Prof Hassan Abbas who teaches international relations at the National Defence University, Washington.

“We cannot build a relationship on one pillar only. A partnership needs to cover all key aspects, trade, education, health, culture.”

Speakers at Wilson Centre event say country teetering on verge of default, urgently needs help to overcome economic crisis

He pointed out that even the security partnership should go beyond military-to-military ties. “A country’s security includes law enforcement, criminal justice, narcotics control, economic security, and social protections,” he said.

One of the sessions focused on the role the Pakistani diaspora in the US can play in promoting US-Pakistan relations.

While moderating the session, IAL President Ghazanfar Hashmi said that now was the time to transform Pak-US relations from geopolitics to geo-economics. Cultural and public diplomacy, he said, includes “establishing people-to-people contact and strengthening bilateral relations between the two nations.

Prof Abbas noted that there’s a convergence of interest on Taliban, TTP and the resurgence other militant groups, as both sides wanted to prevent.

Stressing the need to go beyond security, he said: “Enough funds in the security sector, give more to other sectors, such as IT, education, health and people-to-people engagement,” he said.

Prof Abbas argued that both sides “have been making blunders in the security sector”, which needs to be broadened to train civilian forces, such as the police as well.

Other speakers noted that the US had lowered its engagement with Pakistan since it withdrew from Afghanistan in August 2021, and got engaged in a power competition with China.

They pointed out that Pakistan was teetering on the verge of default and urgently needs help to overcome its economic crisis, which has constrained the government’s ability to provide basic needs to the people.

The speakers argued that the US can help Pakistan in coming out of this crisis, but it was not fully engaged with this issue.

They noted that while the US has not obstructed talks for the resumption of an IMF assistance package, they were not offering bilateral assistance.

The speakers noted that so far only China, Saudi Arabia and UAE had helped Pakistan in preventing a default, sending together about $3 billion to its pool to meet an IMF condition.

The IMF wants Pakistan to arrange $6.5 billion from bilateral donors to meet its financial obligations and to qualify for an IMF programme.

China, which is Pakistan’s largest creditor to whom it owes $27 billion, has rolled over and refinanced some of the other loans as well.

The speakers noted that this would not be a one-time arrangement as Pakistan would need around $25 billion a year for repayments and debt financing over the next few years.

They warned that this would increase Pakistan’s reliance on China, which is willing to help Islamabad for strategic and historical reasons.

The speakers urged the United States not to leave this space open for China as it would push Pakistan deeper into the Chinese camp and hurt US interests in the region.


 
Increasing vulnerability will force Pakistan deeper into debt, speakers at a seminar on US-Pakistan relations argued while urging Washington to help Islamabad rebuild its ailing economy.

OR Pakistanis could actually try to work harder to produce more, instead of begging for more aid. Just a thought.
 
@VCheng @ghazi52

Dont think Pak can get deeper into debt. No one will be lending them anything new. If anything the lenders maybe forced to take some haircut

Regards
 
OR Pakistanis could actually try to work harder to produce more, instead of begging for more aid. Just a thought.
I am not sure about work hard part but on produce more part, true . Without producing more and export more nothing will change.
 
Pakistan needs to shift its export markets from the West to Asian, Central Asian, African, Middle East and Latin American Countries.
 
Pakistan needs to shift its export markets from the West to Asian, Central Asian, African, Middle East and Latin American Countries.
That won't solve the problem of inefficiency, unless what you want to sell isn't competitive nobody will buy it. Despite preferential market access to EU and USA under Generalised Scheme of Preferences given to Pakistan it has been able to export less than $30 billion.
 
That won't solve the problem of inefficiency, unless what you want to sell isn't competitive nobody will buy it. Despite preferential market access to EU and USA under Generalised Scheme of Preferences given to Pakistan it has been able to export less than $30 billion.
If we get rid of exporting for fake dollars then we will be able to stand on our feet. We can also sell within our country as we have a huge population and by controlling imports which are converted into exports we can cut foreign exchange requirements.
 
@VCheng @ghazi52

Dont think Pak can get deeper into debt. No one will be lending them anything new. If anything the lenders maybe forced to take some haircut

Regards

Well, IMF is bound by its charter to help member states when requested to do so by that State, and what lenders do more or get back, is influenced by their financially sound recommendations.

I am not sure about work hard part but on produce more part, true . Without producing more and export more nothing will change.

More production is possible only by hard work, surely.
 
Consumption based economic model is coming to a head. As the global population hits a peak in coming decades, the consumer economies themselves face stagnation. Perpetual production cycle ends... and with that the glut of all the product that has become an environmental disaster. People who've gotten used to putting 20-25 years as line workers or just desk jockeys will see no replacement for yet an aimless perpetual repetitive motion called work!
Money managers are already trying to cut the flow of doe to the bottom... to control the end recipients, perhaps smothering the accumulation or glut of cash, announcing the arrival of new players.

Pakistanis who've been trained or born into the previous model will find it hard to reorient, find their feet in this changing global economy/environment/paradigm.
 
We cannot build a relationship on one pillar only. A partnership needs to cover all key aspects, trade, education, health, culture.
These words comeout only when there is hunger, instability, terrorism and pocket is empty. Once the paklandis get food and money the words get replaced by Jihad, Kashmir banega pakistan, Hum me jazba haaa, hum aatmi quuwat haaa. Vicious Cycle.
 
Pakistan needs to shift its export markets from the West to Asian, Central Asian, African, Middle East and Latin American Countries.

Europe and the US are the biggest markets. Where do you think China and India do the bulk of their exporting?

Pakistan allowed China and India to consolidate all the trade for the last 20 years. Ofcourse this will be the outcome.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom