What's new

The Greeks really do have near-mythical origins, ancient DNA reveals

Pakistani E

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
7,059
Reaction score
27
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The Greeks really do have near-mythical origins, ancient DNA reveals
By Ann GibbonsAug. 2, 2017 , 1:00 PM

Ever since the days of Homer, Greeks have long idealized their Mycenaean “ancestors” in epic poems and classic tragedies that glorify the exploits of Odysseus, King Agamemnon, and other heroes who went in and out of favor with the Greek gods. Although these Mycenaeans were fictitious, scholars have debated whether today’s Greeks descend from the actual Mycenaeans, who created a famous civilization that dominated mainland Greece and the Aegean Sea from about 1600 B.C.E. to 1200 B.C.E., or whether the ancient Mycenaeans simply vanished from the region.

Now, ancient DNA suggests that living Greeks are indeed the descendants of Mycenaeans, with only a small proportion of DNA from later migrations to Greece. And the Mycenaeans themselves were closely related to the earlier Minoans, the study reveals, another great civilization that flourished on the island of Crete from 2600 B.C.E. to 1400 B.C.E. (named for the mythical King Minos).

The ancient DNA comes from the teeth of 19 people, including 10 Minoans from Crete dating to 2900 B.C.E. to 1700 BCE, four Mycenaeans from the archaeological site at Mycenae and other cemeteries on the Greek mainland dating from 1700 B.C.E. to 1200 B.C.E., and five people from other early farming or Bronze Age (5400 B.C.E. to 1340 B.C.E.) cultures in Greece and Turkey. By comparing 1.2 million letters of genetic code across these genomes to those of 334 other ancient people from around the world and 30 modern Greeks, the researchers were able to plot how the individuals were related to each other.


The ancient Mycenaeans and Minoans were most closely related to each other, and they both got three-quarters of their DNA from early farmers who lived in Greece and southwestern Anatolia, which is now part of Turkey, the team reports today in Nature. Both cultures additionally inherited DNA from people from the eastern Caucasus, near modern-day Iran, suggesting an early migration of people from the east after the early farmers settled there but before Mycenaeans split from Minoans.

The Mycenaeans did have an important difference: They had some DNA—4% to 16%—from northern ancestors who came from Eastern Europe or Siberia. This suggests that a second wave of people from the Eurasian steppe came to mainland Greece by way of Eastern Europe or Armenia, but didn’t reach Crete, says Iosif Lazaridis, a population geneticist at Harvard University who co-led the study.

Not surprisingly, the Minoans and Mycenaeans looked alike, both carrying genes for brown hair and brown eyes. Artists in both cultures painted dark-haired, dark-eyed people on frescoes and pottery who resemble each other, although the two cultures spoke and wrote different languages. The Mycenaeans were more militaristic, with art replete with spears and images of war, whereas Minoan art showed few signs of warfare, Lazaridis says. Because the Minoans script used hieroglyphics, some archaeologists thought they were partly Egyptian, which turns out to be false.

When the researchers compared the DNA of modern Greeks to that of ancient Mycenaeans, they found a lot of genetic overlap. Modern Greeks share similar proportions of DNA from the same ancestral sources as Mycenaeans, although they have inherited a little less DNA from ancient Anatolian farmers and a bit more DNA from later migrations to Greece.

The continuity between the Mycenaeans and living people is “particularly striking given that the Aegean has been a crossroads of civilizations for thousands of years,” says co-author George Stamatoyannopoulos of the University of Washington in Seattle. This suggests that the major components of the Greeks’ ancestry were already in place in the Bronze Age, after the migration of the earliest farmers from Anatolia set the template for the genetic makeup of Greeks and, in fact, most Europeans. “The spread of farming populations was the decisive moment when the major elements of the Greek population were already provided,” says archaeologist Colin Renfrew of the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom, who was not involved in the work.

The results also show it is possible to get ancient DNA from the hot, dry landscape of the eastern Mediterranean, Renfrew says. He and others now have hope for getting DNA from groups such as the mysterious Hittites who came to ancient Anatolia sometime before 2000 B.C.E. and who may have been the source of Caucasian ancestry in Mycenaeans and early Indo-European languages in the region. Archaeologist Kristian Kristiansen of the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, who was not involved in the work, agrees. “The results have now opened up the next chapter in the genetic history of western Eurasia—that of the Bronze Age Mediterranean.”

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017...ave-near-mythical-origins-ancient-dna-reveals
 
How does this map on to the traditional accounts? Pretty well, actually.

We have the Pelasgians, and their now lost language, that was still spoken in pockets and understood by the majority Hellenic speakers even in the 5th century AD, represented in the account above by the farmers of the mainland, the archipelago and of Anatolia.

We have the Mycenaean/ Minoan 'wave' travelling more or less on an east-west axis from Anatolia outwards, branching into the islands (Minoan) and to the right, across the islands of the Aegean onto mainland Greece.

We have the Ionians and the Achaeans with their bronze swords coming in from a north-east direction, through the Balkans and the steppes behind, around both sides of the Black Sea, and on into the Greek mainland, wheeling left to traverse the islands in the opposite direction to that of the Mycenaeans.

Finally we have the last wave, the Dorians, with their lethal iron swords, penetrating right through to the Peloponnesus.

Unlike popular impressions, none of these 'waves' were huge masses of humanity. In a revision of similar variety as in the case of India, these mid-millennial migrations were also constituted of relatively small numbers of war-like people from the steppes, who prevailed upon the resident majority with their pantheon and their language and their social organisation.

The mapping is pretty consistent.
 
Unlike popular impressions, none of these 'waves' were huge masses of humanity.

yes they were. giant blobs of blonde hair blue eyed aryans coming across the cold steppes. thats what the angry german guy said
 
I just find it funny we got no record of human civilization beyond 3000-4000 years out of 6,000,000,000 years earth has been in existance

Pretty silly I wonder what we were doing as human spicies before 4,000 years did the human mind had enough intelligence to write stuff on walls and caves
 
I just find it funny we got no record of human civilization beyond 3000-4000 years out of 6,000,000,000 years earth has been in existance

Pretty silly I wonder what we were doing as human spicies before 4,000 years did the human mind had enough intelligence to write stuff on walls and caves

What sort of 'record' did you have in mind? Not writing, I hope; we got that worked out only recently, perhaps around the time of the earliest Mesopotamian cuneiform tablets, or the yet undeciphered Indus Valley Civilisation pictorial seals. As for records of human existence, that goes back nearly 2 million years, in terms of finding traces of human bodies that far back. Those earlier traces, fossils, were NOT Homo Sapiens, but were predecessors.

Maybe your question has something to do with the evolution of species.

Going back a bit, we did think earlier that the earliest records of human existence, other than fossils, was about 3,000 to 5,000 years ago (this bit is being written from memory, I haven't had my morning cuppa, so E&OE, and all that sort of thing). It was the path-breaking work of Marija Gimbutas that showed that a much earlier layer of archaeological evidence existed, at the 10,000 years BC level. These are records of our species, Homo Sapiens Sapiens. From further fossil evidence, we find the earliest date of our species at around 200,000 years ago.

I don't feel up to writing up the whole history of discovery of humans as they evolved in 200 words for PDF, so if you want to know more, you have to ask questions.



633px-Homo-Stammbaum%2C_Version_Stringer-en.svg.png


yes they were. giant blobs of blonde hair blue eyed aryans coming across the cold steppes. thats what the angry german guy said

Thank you for your contribution.
 
Back
Top Bottom