What's new

Iran's expanding sphere of influence: Iranian T-72 tanks in Iraq

Ahmed Jo

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Messages
847
Reaction score
1
Country
Jordan
Location
United States




Iraq's fight against the fighters of the Islamic State is one not only fought by Iraq's Armed Forces and the Peshmerga, but also by an increasing number of Shiite militias, most of which receive extensive support from Iran. Iraq's equivalent of the Lebanese Hizbullah movement, Kata'ib Hizbullah, is without a doubt the strongest and most influential of all Shiite militias currently present in Iraq. This has come to be so mostly thanks to Iranian funding, lethal aid and the presence of Iranian advisors on the ground.

Iran has supplied these militias with anything from 12.7mm AM.50 anti-materiel rifles, 40mm Nasir grenade launchers, Safir jeeps equipped with 107mm multiple rocket launchers (MRLs), recoilless rifles and even 122mm HM-20 MRLs, all of which produced in Iran. The amount and type of weaponry supplied depends on the size of the militias in question.

However, the rumoured presence of Iranian tanks with militias in Iraq could until now not be confirmed. These rumours quickly made their way around the world each time any vehicle with tracks on a tank transporter driving close to the Western border of Iran was sighted. Now photograpic evidence has finally arisen of Iranian tanks that have joined the fight against the Islamic State in Iraq, and are busy driving their fighters out of the town of Tikrit.






Seen above is an Iranian T-72S, clearly distinguishable from Iraq's own T-72 'Urals' and T-72M1s by the presence of attachments allowing for the installment of 155 Kontakt-1 explosive reactive armour blocks (ERA), all surprisingly missing on this example, and the smoke grenade launchers on the side of the turret instead on the front as seen with the T-72M1.

While one could argue that this particular T-72S could have been part of a recently struck arms deal between Iraq and Russia that has not been uncovered, yet the Iranian camouflage pattern on the tank leaves no doubt about the true origin of the tank. For comparison, an Iranian T-72S (with ERA titles) during a parade can be seen below.



It is currently unknown if the T-72S pictured near Tikrit is crewed by Iranians and part of Kata'ib Hizbullah's arsenal, or if it is actually in service with the Iraqi Army. Kata'ib Hizbullah is known to operate just one tank, an M1 Abrams which was left behind by the Iraqi Army, and thus lacks the heavy fire-support essential for close combat fighting in towns such as Tikrit. Iran supplying a limited amount of T-72s drawn from Iranian army or Revolutionary Guard stocks makes perfect sense in this light.

Whatever effect they may have on the ultimate course of the war, it is certain that the influence of the Iran on conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere is not to be underestimated. With Iran now using its military industry to exert influence in a host of Middle Eastern nations ranging from Iraq, Syria and Yemen to even Libya, its intentions of expanding its sphere of influence become ever more clear, and it's certain Iran is not to be underestimated when devising policies on the Middle East.




@al-Hasani all the more reason for Saudi Arabia and nearby Arab states to have indigenous and effective military industries, if the Iranians can do it with supposedly 'crippling' sanctions then a rich state like KSA or the UAE can as well.
 
No, I'm just kidding ;)

How many tanks did Iran sent? Don't tell me it is just 1 piece :lol:

Enough to evaporate Turkish influence in Iraq and Syria. I hear you guys had to wake up a dead ancestor of yours, dig him up and rebury him 100 meters from Turkish border, giving up and abandoning a piece of sovereign Turkish territory in the process as well as destroying the essence of treaty of Lausanne, the foundation of Turkish existence. Only 100 meters. That is measure of the penetration of Turkish influence in the region.
 
Enough to evaporate Turkish influence in Iraq and Syria. I hear you guys had to wake up a dead ancestor of yours, dig him up and rebury him 100 meters from Turkish border, giving up and abandoning a piece of sovereign Turkish territory in the process as well as destroying the essence of treaty of Lausanne, the foundation of Turkish existence. Only 100 meters. That is measure of the penetration of Turkish influence in the region.
You are showing your class again. Anyway, good luck fighting ISIS. When you are done with weakening them. We will roll our tanks into Syria and save the day.
 
Relocated, after it had already been relocated. This is typical of dying empires recession of influence. Only 100 meter of influence is what is left now.

1424610734026.jpg
 
Relocated, after it had already been relocated. This is typical of dying empires recession of influence. Only 100 meter of influence is what is left now.

1424610734026.jpg
We will make a better one at Jabar Fortress ;)
 
We will make a better one at Jabar Fortress ;)

@Syrian Lion

Syrians would never allow that. That tomb and the territory was there when Turkey had very excellent relationship with Syria. But now that Turkey has shot itself in the foot, and has gone from "zero problems policy" to "all problems policy", there is no chance of Turkey getting back its sovereign territory.

Eventually, Turkey will have to relocate the grave, inside Turkey, once again disturbing the poor guy's eternal sleep. And since there is no tomb and no grave, Turkey as per international law and the treaty of Lausanne, has lost its claim to that sovereign territory. It is now all Syrian.

You might not have realized it yet, but this was the last Turkish stand and Turkish military could not defend it, let alone exerting any influence to save face. It goes way beyond the symbolism of what has actually happened.
 
Syrians would never allow that.
Did we asked permission from Assad , when we rolled 40 tanks in to it's "soverign territory" ??

That tomb and the territory was there when Turkey had very excellent relationship with Syria. But now that Turkey has shot itself in the foot, and has gone from "zero problems policy" to "all problems policy", there is no chance of Turkey getting back its sovereign territory.
I see you have some misunderstanding there. We already declared a part of Syrian soil as Turkish soil and erected our flag.

b-b7znyiyaapoke-483x350.jpg

Eventually, Turkey will have to relocate the grave, inside Turkey, once again disturbing the poor guy's eternal sleep. And since there is no tomb and no grave, Turkey as per international law and the treaty of Lausanne, has lost its claim to that sovereign territory. It is now all Syrian.
Like a said before... our rights to have a Turkish territory in the Syrian Land continues....just shifted location in Syria. That's all. And we don't ask permission from Assad or his government. If he didn't like it, he can always challenge us in the battlefield.
You might not have realized it yet, but this was the last Turkish stand and Turkish military could not defend it, let alone exerting any influence to save face. It goes way beyond the symbolism of what has actually happened.
First learn the meaning of defending....

Resist an attack made on (someone or something); defend - definition of defend in English from the Oxford dictionary

There was no attack, so what exactly that we couldn't defend it from ?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another question, we penetrated Syria, invaded it's land. Will you come and save your buddy from the Turkish invasion..... i'm asking you, since you have a defence pact among yourselves. ???

Well, every body knows the answer. You would prefer to bark from a safe distance....or should a say meoww, Persian kitties. :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nice target practice for manpads.
manpads for tanks?

You wish.
He is afraid for ISIS, that they might come to Turkey to roost.
Iran is doing a smart thing in the right time. Surrounding The Sauds et getting to an arm length to Israel, to neutralise her deterrence...By the way the Houthis conducted their biggest military war game at the Saudi borders...Time to invest in Hotel in Cairo..:buba_phone:
 
Did we asked permission from Assad , when we rolled 40 tanks in to it's "soverign territory" ??

Not at all. By not getting permission, you have unilaterally destroyed the treaty. And that treaty was your only internationally recognized claim to that sovereign land. You will never get it back now. Raising a flag, American style, 100 meter away from the border of a civil war hit country, does not prove your power. By the way the land that was used for new burial ground is actually privately owned by Kurds. Now, go figure.
 
Not at all. By not getting permission, you have unilaterally destroyed the treaty. And that treaty was your only internationally recognized claim to that sovereign land.
We will see about that :smokin:
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom