What's new

IMF spells out stringent conditions for $3b breather

nahtanbob

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2018
Messages
14,105
Reaction score
-57
Country
United States
Location
United States
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has slapped a stringent condition on Pakistan to stop its intervention in the exchange rate market and also said that the risks to the new $3 billion programme implementation were “exceptionally high”.

The global lender on Tuesday released its staff report on the $3 billion Stand-by Arrangement (SBA) that also appeared in a charge sheet against the government over its poor handling of the economy during the past year.

The report revealed how the government distorted the exchange rate market and the central bank lacked clarity when the pressures were increasing.

Pakistan accepted 10 major conditions in addition to accepting 13 other performance and indicative targets in return for the $3 billion package for July 12 to April 2024 period, the report showed.

The IMF said that the length of the SBA is also tailored to leave space for the new government to embark on a fresh programme, if it so wishes, enhancing ownership.

The government also committed that it would notify an increase in electricity prices before the end of July with effect from July 1 and that it would no longer grant any tax amnesty or tax concessions.

According to a major condition, the average premium between the interbank and open market exchange rates would not be more than 1.25% during any consecutive five business days.

At today’s value, the difference comes to around Rs4 per dollar.

The IMF said that reliance on administrative measures to manage imports since May 2022 and the tightly controlled exchange rate since September 2022 had caused a significant damage to growth and exacerbated external pressures by dissuading inflows, especially remittances.

“These interventions have undermined public trust in the exchange rate system and, going forward, it will be necessary to ensure that the exchange rate will be market-determined, allowed to act as a shock absorber, and free from formal or informal guidance or restrictions,” it added.

The IMF said that without the ability to formally intervene in the forex market, informal efforts began in the fall, including moral suasion on banks, to nudge the exchange rate to appreciate.

It added that when this did not succeed – import-payment restrictions and a crawl-like behaviour from October 2022 through end-January 2023, which fuelled pressures in the interbank market – exacerbated the scarcity of dollars, allowed the forex black market to grow and caused disruptions in the timely import of key inputs for domestic production and exports.

The IMF “staff emphasised that a functioning and flexible exchange rate market should be the means to address BOP pressures, rather than administrative and exchange measures”.

In the Letter of Intent to the IMF managing director, the finance minister and the SBP governor committed that they “will refrain from formal and informal guidance on the exchange rates of FX intermediaries”.

Risks to programme implementation

The report revealed that “downside risks to the baseline and programme implementation are exceptionally high”.

Amplified by the tense political environment, policy slippages could undermine programme implementation, in turn, jeopardising macro-financial and external stability and already stretched debt sustainability, it added.

Moreover, the IMF said, “External financing risks are exceptionally high and delays in the disbursement of planned external financing from international financial institutions and bilateral creditors pose major risks to a very fragile external balance given the extremely limited buffers.”

The IMF assessed Pakistan’s external financing requirements at $28.3 billion for the current fiscal year.

The IMF said, “Pakistan’s capacity to repay the Fund is subject to significant risks and would critically depend on policy implementation and timely external financing.

“The IMF underlined that “social discontent (in Pakistan) has risen over the deteriorating economic conditions and eroded living standards, and political tensions escalated significantly in May, with political and institutional fissures coming to the fore.”

It added that the financial pressures ahead had become formidable.


“Gross financing needs are very large, mostly due to large debt service payments, while external market financing has dried up.

“Confidence is weak, and credit rating agencies have downgraded Pakistan to just above default rating. Multilateral and official bilateral support has been critical to enable Pakistan to meet its debt obligations,” according to the IMF.

The IMF said that risks to debt sustainability “have become more acute, given the scarcity of external financing and the large gross financing needs that persist over the coming years, further narrowing the path to sustainability”.

“Any further downward revisions to the baseline could push debt towards unsustainability,” it added.

The IMF said that Pakistan’s economic challenges were complex and multifaceted, and risks were exceptionally high.

Addressing them required steadfast implementation of agreed policies, as well as continued financial support from external partners.

Consistent and decisive implementation of programme agreements will be essential to reduce risks and maintain macroeconomic stability.

It said that the economy took a tumble in FY23 amid worsening domestic and external conditions, stringent import payment restrictions, and the impact of the floods.

Provisional estimates for FY23 released by the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) in May put real GDP growth at 0.3%, however data outturned in recent months disappointed and staff assessed that real GDP could decline by 0.5 per cent in the last fiscal year, it added.

But economic growth would likely pick up moderately in this fiscal year, reaching about 2.5%.

SBP inaction

The IMF also found flaws in the working of the central bank. It said that despite the mounting pressures, actions by the SBP lacked clarity, as it kept its policy rate unchanged in Monetary Policy Committee meetings in August, October, and early June, expecting that the price rises had peaked and would subside.

FBR failures

The IMF said, “Revenue efforts to broaden the tax base fell short of expectations during the last four years programme period, and the tax-to-GDP ratio has declined.”

The report disclosed that the government imposed Rs254 billion in additional taxes.

The report revealed that the government would earn Rs79 billion extra by increasing the petroleum levy rate to Rs60 per litre with a path to reach an average rate of PRs 55 per litre over FY24.

The increase of personal income tax on salaried and business individuals will earn an additional Rs30 billion.

The 5% tax on DAP fertiliser would bring an additional Rs34 billion, an increase of FED on sugary drinks would bring additional revenue of Rs8 billion and increases of the advance tax on the purchase and sale of immovable property would yield an additional Rs46 billion.

The broadening of the base of the tax on second homes and other high-wealth items for non-filers; will fetch Rs19 billion.

The increase in the advance tax for builders and developers based on the land size of the project under development was estimated to generate Rs15 billion.
The increase of the additional GST on deliveries to businesses that were not registered for VAT would fetch Rs23 billion.

The government also committed that it would expand the income tax base by another 300,000 persons through the use of data and physical surveys to book new individuals.

They would also seek to bring the service sector, notably retailers, into the tax net by making better use of data (eg, from tax collected through electricity bills on commercial connections).

Monetary policy

The IMF emphasised that the SBP would need to continue its tightening cycle to re-anchor expectations given that inflationary pressures were expected to persist over the coming year, including because the impact of exchange rate corrections would continue to reverberate through the economy.

“The SBP agreed to maintain a tight monetary policy stance—higher rates and prudent use of liquidity injections— as needed, given incoming data, to achieve real positive interest rates, on a forward-looking basis, and place inflation and inflation expectations on a clear downward path,” according to the IMF.
 
According to military generals and PDM all is well now.
 
With these conditions, every sensible political party would secretly wish to lose.
 
.,..,
1689883275916.png
 
 

Why a $3 Billion IMF Loan Isn't Enough to Save Pakistan's Economy​


In June, Pakistan was in a race against time to secure $1.1 billion from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in a bid to solve its worst economic crisis since gaining independence from Britain in 1947. Days before an existing bailout package was set to expire, the country’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, held last-minute talks with the IMF after scrambling to meet its austerity conditions, in which he pledged to revise Pakistan’s budget by hiking tax rates and cutting spending.

That led to a dramatic reversal from the global lender: it announced a new, bigger-than-expected conditional loan of $3 billion, which the IMF calls a stand-by arrangement (SBA). On July 12, the IMF’s Executive Board approved the deal, allowing for an immediate disbursement of about $1.2 billion.

Watch: Trump and 18 Co-Defendants Mug Shots In Georgia 2020 Election Case Watch: Trump and 18 Co-Defendants Mug Shots In Georgia 2020 Election Case

“The new SBA would provide a policy anchor and a framework for financial support from multilateral and bilateral partners in the period ahead,” the IMF stated.

While the deal offers a respite to Pakistan’s ailing economy, experts warn the country is far from solving the structural problems that led to defaults in the past.
Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif, right, meets with International Monetary Fund's Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva in Paris, France, on June 22, hoping to unlock a $6 billion bailout and gain the release of a critical tranche of $1.1 billion in loans which has been on hold since November. (Prime Minister Office/AP)


Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif, right, meets with International Monetary Fund's Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva in Paris, France, on June 22, hoping to unlock a $6 billion bailout and gain the release of a critical tranche of $1.1 billion in loans which has been on hold since November.

Prime Minister Office/AP

“Pakistan has been living beyond its means by borrowing from bilateral lenders and multinational institutions,” says Steve H. Hanke, a professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University. “All this borrowing has done Pakistan little good.”

Over the years, the IMF has drawn criticism for its lending practices, with Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz arguing that many of the conditions it imposes on borrowers—like fiscal austerity and high-interest rates—have often been counterproductive for impoverished countries, and devastating for their local populations. In the case of Pakistan, it appears the IMF is not deviating from its traditional course.

Here’s what to know about Pakistan’s economic crisis:

What has caused the downturn in Pakistan’s economy?​


Pakistan, a nation of 240 million people, has a gross domestic product of $376 billion, slightly larger than Hong Kong’s. Its economy was already struggling after years of financial mismanagement, but last year, the country was pushed to the brink by a global energy crisis caused by Russia’s war in Ukraine and catastrophic floods that impacted the lives of millions of Pakistanis.

“We call it the ‘Triple-C crisis’: COVID, the conflict in Ukraine, and climate change,” says Abid Qaiyum Suleri, the executive director of the Sustainable Development Policy Institute in Islamabad. “All three factors aggravated Pakistan’s economic situation.”

The 2022 floods—which at one point drenched a third of the country, displaced 8 million people and damaged more than 2 million houses—also resulted in economic losses of more than $30 billion, according to an assessment from the Pakistani government in partnership with the U.N., the E.U., the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank.

Read More: Pakistan Flooding Raises Tough Questions About Who Should Pay For Catastrophic Climate Impacts

Crushing poverty and shrinking job prospects have also driven emigration out of the country. In 2022, the Bureau of Emigration recorded more than 750,000 people leaving Pakistan, a threefold increase from 2021.

Pakistan recorded record-high inflation of 38% for two consecutive months in June as Sharif, the prime minister, struggled to implement a recovery plan. To boost its popularity with voters, the government increased energy subsidies and depleted the country’s foreign exchange reserves to a critically low level of $2.9 billion, the lowest in nine years.
What is Pakistan’s latest arrangement with the IMF?

Under the new agreement, the IMF will disburse $3 billion over nine months. To clinch the deal, Pakistan revised its annual budget by raising taxes by $750 million and hiking its interest rate to 22%, mainly to curb soaring inflation.

The austerity reforms came after Sharif spoke on June 27 about the bailout funds with IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva, who said Pakistani authorities had taken “decisive measures” to bring policies in line with the IMF’s economic reform program.

The deal replaces a four-year Extended Financing Facility program of $6.5 billion, originally signed by former Prime Minister Imran Khan in 2019, which expired last month. Last November, it was due for its ninth review by the global lender after previously clearing eight of the 11 reviews. But Khan’s government deviated from its IMF obligations days before he was ousted from the government in a parliamentary vote.

To date, Pakistan has relied on 23 IMF relief programs. Husain Haqqani, a former Pakistani ambassador to the U.S., likened the IMF to an intensive care unit (ICU) for Pakistan. “But if somebody has to go to the ICU 23 times, then something is wrong with the overall treatment plan,” he says.

Will the IMF’s new deal help Pakistan’s economic recovery?

The new IMF funds will likely bring short-term relief by unlocking credit from other financiers, including the private market, and strengthening prospects for foreign direct investment. One day before the IMF board meeting, Saudi Arabia announced it would provide Pakistan with $2 billion in financial support.

“It’s bridge financing that would provide some sort of breathing space to help in mobilizing funds from friendly countries, as well as from other multilateral donors,” says Suleri.

However, analysts and political advisers speaking to TIME also warned that in the long term, they are only a band-aid solution unless Pakistan can implement the serious, large-scale reforms required to tackle issues like a heavy reliance on costly fuel imports, an agricultural sector grappling with water and energy shortages, a lack of investment in public welfare, and a political elite prone to corruption.

What’s more, the government now faces repaying $25 billion in debt in the current fiscal year, which it would likely struggle to repay without further financial assistance from lenders like China and Saudi Arabia, as well as another IMF bailout.

Read More: China Spent Years Lending to Low-Income Countries. That’s Becoming a Problem.

“The good news is that a lot of Pakistanis are now saying that we need a fundamental shift in our economy,” says Haqqani. “The bad news is that there’s still no clarity on whether the elite is willing to give up their privileges and prerequisites.”

He continues, “Will the government be strong-willed enough to push back sufficiently to get what it wants? That is going to determine where things go next.”

 

Back
Top Bottom