What's new

Chengdu J-10 Multirole Fighter Air Craft News & Discussions

So now we also have the C in PLAAF service ... but I really do not understand, why the C lacks the MAWS on its tail ?

View attachment 290675

I think the pics are in this order, J-10A (top), B (middle), C (bottom). Please double-check if that's correct, thanks!

J10-A-B-C.png
 
I think the pics are in this order, J-10A (top), B (middle), C (bottom). Please double-check if that's correct, thanks!

View attachment 291003


NO ... They are correct in the original image and in Yours, the C now is in the middle. This latest version is externally recognisable on that blade aerial in the fin close to the tip, three antennas/aerials on the spine and quite strangely the lacking RWRs on the fin.
 
NO ... They are correct in the original image and in Yours, the C now is in the middle. This latest version is externally recognisable on that blade aerial in the fin close to the tip, three antennas/aerials on the spine and quite strangely the lacking RWRs on the fin.


Thanks bro!

Here is a source from Xinhua ( http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2016-02/02/c_128693496_2.htm ), saying this plane (201) is very likely to be J-10C. There is PWR on the fin, and one antenna on the spine.

Untitled.png


Can you help verify whether the source is being correct or not? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
201305zlmya66mxah25mjx.jpg.thumb.jpg


J-10Cs entering service en mass。:enjoy:


Here a bit better ...

IMO it's amazing how incredibly thorough the Chinese posters are at blurring out the serials on all J-10B/S and J-16. Given the fact that the J-10 production plant is in the middle of Chengdu, with millions of people armed with cameras all around it, and yet we haven't been able to find a clear picture with a clear serial - only one to be precisely - and that's even more surprising in mind of the countless high-resolution images of the PLAAF's true "premier" fighter, the J-20 ....

Deino
 

Attachments

  • J-10C serial - 3.2.16 part.jpg
    J-10C serial - 3.2.16 part.jpg
    216.1 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
NO ... They are correct in the original image and in Yours, the C now is in the middle. This latest version is externally recognisable on that blade aerial in the fin close to the tip, three antennas/aerials on the spine and quite strangely the lacking RWRs on the fin.

If C's the one in the middle, then it's lacking the LWS in the rear.

Anyway, do we know the configuration of B and C?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom