Awesome
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2006
- Messages
- 22,023
- Reaction score
- 5
The issue of it all is that if you impose such a rule there will be resistance, even from the women. If you take away a woman's right to be clothed the way she wants to be, you are taking away a key civil liberty.
In that case a determined woman may think, no option let me blow myself up and kill a few of these governmental types to teach them a lesson.
Point I'm making is that as you impose moral rules you impose lack of recourse other than terrorism. Terrorism doesn't happen for the fun of it, somewhere we screwed up big time to make it happen.
I mean sure you can enforce the ban and say that hey all those women who were pressurized will now not be, and the few who weren't who cares eh? Let's expand on that example.
If someone makes the law, that we all have to be homosexuals, to ensure homosexuals can safely have sex with each other, then what will we do? Some who are gay, will go by as normal, some gays who care about civil liberties will do what I am doing right now about women's freedom and speak on the rights of heterosexuals to choose to have sex with whichever gender they want to. True civil liberties proponents won't say allow same gender intercourse or allow mixed gender intercourse, they will say choose as you want to do. The ones who will pick a side are either fakers or have ulterior motives driven by silly phobias and ideals.
So what would a heterosexual do then? First go to court, court will say sorry that's the law. Then? Leave the country, sorry no money to apply for US visa. Then? Ok lets blow stuff up and take everybody else down too!
What you're proposing with veils is no different in terms of taking away the choice.
The issue about pressurizing and security are both your own failures, why isn't your law enforcement system strong enough to prevent that when your law clearly states its open to all. When I say speeding on the road is not allowed, law enforcement places radar guns on streets, patrol cars, pursuit cars to prevent speeding drivers. Solutions exist to ensure the no speeding law is followed, why don't you make any solution to ensure burkha is worn freely and removed freely by the woman's choice only and how you do it is your problem. If you don't figure it out you should quit or go to jail for failing to do an important part of your job.
In that case a determined woman may think, no option let me blow myself up and kill a few of these governmental types to teach them a lesson.
Point I'm making is that as you impose moral rules you impose lack of recourse other than terrorism. Terrorism doesn't happen for the fun of it, somewhere we screwed up big time to make it happen.
I mean sure you can enforce the ban and say that hey all those women who were pressurized will now not be, and the few who weren't who cares eh? Let's expand on that example.
If someone makes the law, that we all have to be homosexuals, to ensure homosexuals can safely have sex with each other, then what will we do? Some who are gay, will go by as normal, some gays who care about civil liberties will do what I am doing right now about women's freedom and speak on the rights of heterosexuals to choose to have sex with whichever gender they want to. True civil liberties proponents won't say allow same gender intercourse or allow mixed gender intercourse, they will say choose as you want to do. The ones who will pick a side are either fakers or have ulterior motives driven by silly phobias and ideals.
So what would a heterosexual do then? First go to court, court will say sorry that's the law. Then? Leave the country, sorry no money to apply for US visa. Then? Ok lets blow stuff up and take everybody else down too!
What you're proposing with veils is no different in terms of taking away the choice.
The issue about pressurizing and security are both your own failures, why isn't your law enforcement system strong enough to prevent that when your law clearly states its open to all. When I say speeding on the road is not allowed, law enforcement places radar guns on streets, patrol cars, pursuit cars to prevent speeding drivers. Solutions exist to ensure the no speeding law is followed, why don't you make any solution to ensure burkha is worn freely and removed freely by the woman's choice only and how you do it is your problem. If you don't figure it out you should quit or go to jail for failing to do an important part of your job.
