1. It is wisdom to realise what we do know and what we do not
2. It is intelligence to ask for help in areas one is lacking when lives are at stake
3. It is shame that prevents one from hollering or grinding an agenda when it is unrelated and lives are at stake
You exhibit none.
No of course not, and i do understand the sentiment you're alluding to, but the sentiment while noble does not match the current reality.
Practically, besides religion, there exists no other binding factor. Absent a strong enough declaration from the other party it would be incorrect to expect...
1. Understood, thank you for clarifying that
2. It works if they took the mantle of morality in the first place, like if they proclaimed to be the representatives of the faithfull. Absent that would that not be expecting others to be just with no cause but morality, a sentiment while noble but...
1. Its neither a justification to turn a blind eye to an injustice or an attempt to normalise it
2. It is equally incorrect to assume morality from a nation since they act in self interest while keeping morality as a secondary virtue
3. What happened here in India was wrong as well, you've...
1. What about sufficient safeguards, like protective head gear, gloves, mouth clamps etc, would having such safeguards make it within permissible limits?
One could argue that having professionals throwing balls at you at 140+km/hr would be harmfull to the body as well.
Lots of sports could be...
1. Was boxing prohibited? i ask from a place of ignorance
2. You're right, that would be the decent thing to do, but on a national scale for a country which is trying to increase tourism and increase holding such events, personal interest would triump morality. It would be unrealistic to expect...
This is hypocrisy manifest. Free speech when it suits the ruling polity.
Atleast one can console themselves that it is merely introduced and not passed, but with the current state of affairs who knows
Not gonna lie, that was a good zing, Made me chuckle:D
What baffles me is the triggered reaction to it, like this is legit the pakistani defence forum, what are Indian posters expecting, a shabashi and a pat on the back?:no:
Not necessarily, US law prohibits weapon carrying ships to be repaired in a foreign dock. Primarily it was a measure to protect business for its own repair docks.
Repairing logistical ships would be immensely benefitial as it would improve supply lines and reduce downtime while ensuring...
I believe you're using the incorrect formula, South Park university already posited the correct measurement formula, and we're well above the average
When in Rome :D