What's new

‘Ignored century’ with lessons for today’s confusion

Dushmann

BANNED
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
653
Reaction score
-8
Country
India
Location
India
https://www.dawn.com/news/amp/1324306


Published Apr 02, 2017 07:08am
Harking Back: ‘Ignored century’ with lessons for today’s confusion
Majid Sheikh

One of the most neglected ‘recent’ period in Lahore’s history is almost the entire century starting 1707 AD, from the death of the last ‘great’ Mughal Aurangzeb to the rise of the remarkable Maharajah Ranjit Singh in 1799.

This surely is the most complex and defining century, one that in a way determines how we behave today. Within it lies the secrets of the dynamics, and logic, of what is happening today, confused and intricate as it is. History certainly does not repeat itself, but merely carries lessons for future analysts. Our neglect, at a sub-conscious level, is that we do not pick up the lessons. If we study current political and military personalities and their actions, legal and otherwise, we can find amazingly similar characters in this neglected period with abandon.

In this period we will concentrate on a very short time period in the middle of a little recognised force that ruled Lahore from 1758 to 1759. They decisively knocked out the powerful invading forces of the Afghan Abdalis, chasing them beyond the mountains of Peshawar. On the 20th of April, 1757, the Maratha forces under their general Raghu Nath Rao, an immensely brave Rajput Rao warrior, attacked Lahore and captured it. The Peshwa’s commander entered the Lahore Fort.

This had an emotional significance for the Hindus of the sub-continent. After almost 738 years a Hindu ruler had returned to Lahore. The original rulers of Lahore were invariably Hindu Rajput Rao. It took the Afghan invader Mahmud of Ghazni to defeat the city’s Puru, the Hindushahi ruler Trilochanpal Shahi in 1020, reducing the city to dirt and taking the entire able-bodied population left alive after a massacre to sell in Central Asian slave markets. It was an experience that for centuries was difficult to forget for the people of Lahore. Today communal considerations have wiped that out of our collective memory.

The Maratha move on Lahore must be seen in the context of the fall of Sirhind to the Marathas. Ahmed Shah Abdali’s son Taimur Shah Durrani correctly judged the overwhelming force of the advancing Marathas, assisted as they were by a fired-up 15,000 cavalry force of Punjabi Sikh ‘misls’. The Punjab was finally rising again. In legend it has been compared to the amazing victory of the Bharata tribe on the banks of the River Ravi at Lahore over the combined forces of the Ten Kings (‘Dasanrajan’) as described the epic Mahabharata.

The fall of Sirhind to the Marathas advancing on Delhi had alarmed Ahmad Shah’s son Taimur Shah Durrani and his governor Jahan Khan at Lahore. The Afghan chiefs lost nerve and fled to Peshawar, leaving behind their troops in Lahore under Aziz Khan. On the approach of the combined forces of the Marathas and the Sikh ‘misls’, the Afghan forces started fleeing the city, taking with them, as remains their tradition, anything they could lay their hands on. On the 20th of April 1758, Raghu Nath Rao attacked and conquered Lahore.

In a parallel move of immense military finesse, the Maratha general Tukojee Holkar conquered Multan and moved northwards to Peshawar. The forces from Lahore, in no small measure reinforced by additional Sikh ‘misls’, moved westwards in a classic pincer movement to finish off the Afghans by the 8th of May, 1758. Such was the power of this assault that the Afghans abandoned the sub-continent returning beyond the Khyber Pass.

The Sikh ‘misls’ in an immensely wise move decided to withdraw to their homeland of the Punjab, and kept themselves aloof from the Maratha forces. This meant that the Marathas under their commander Dattajee Shinde, were left alone to defend the western borders. So it was that Holkar and his 10,000 troops were stationed in Peshawar, another 4,000 troops under Narsojee Pandit were stationed at Attock. A large Maratha force of 6,000 troops under Baboojee Trimbak headed southward to defend Multan and an additional 3,000 Maratha troops went to Dera Ghazi Khan under Netagee Bhosle.

Thus almost 35 per cent of the Maratha force under their supreme commander Raghunath Rao headed back to Lahore. They were assisted by a rebel Mughal force under Adina Beg Khan, a crafty Arain from Sharaqpur, near Sheikhupura, who had joined the Marathas on the promise of becoming the ‘subedar’ of the Punjab. The Sikhs, so accounts tell us, simply melted away towards their ‘misl’ territory. This strategy of an invisible force of immense potency, capable of reappearing at short notice, is what saw the Sikhs ultimately gain ascendancy.

This is the point at which the Marathas were at the peak of their power. The cities of Peshawar, Multan, Lahore and Delhi were under them as were all the cities of eastern and southern India. One description claims their territory was over 2.8 million square kilometres.

With the Sikhs refusing to talk the Marathas decided to appoint Adina Beg Khan as the ‘subedar’ of the Punjab, provided he paid them an annual tribute of 7.5 million. They withdrew their thinly-spread army back to Maratha country to defend the eastern borders. This meant that the man from Sharaqpur was left alone to deal with the Sikhs, whose influence in Lahore was considerable. Amazingly, the Muslim elite were highly suspicious of Adina Beg, who felt threatened and fled Lahore to live in Batala. His son-in-law Khawaja Mirza took over. He was so incompetent that a well-known phrase became common in the streets of Lahore, that being: “Aik Khawaja tay ohe Mirza, tarla gowacha” (On the one hand a Khawaja and same a Mirza means a lost mixture).

A depressed Adina Beg Khan died on the 15th of September, 1758. His death was followed by turmoil with his soldiers deserting and looting the countryside. The Marathas refused to return to assist. This disinterest led the Afghans, who had by now regrouped, return to attack and take the fort at Attock. However, at Lahore as the Afghans approached the Sikhs invited the Marathas and another combined force decimated the Afghans.

The Sikhs played their cards very well. Abdali gathered a 60,000 force to avenge the defeat and the fifth invasion of the sub-continent had started. This time the Afghans had heavy field guns. It was a new modern army. The 1759 Battle of Lahore had started and the swift Sikhs ran through their guns and defeated the Afghans.

But the defeat of the smaller Maratha garrisons led the Peshwa to send a larger army and the Third Battle of Panipat took place. Abdali was better equipped in a fixed set-piece battle and the Marathas were decimated. Abdalis victory brought home the message to the Marathas that for them Deccan was more important than a ‘distant’ Punjab. Also growing French and British influence to the east meant the Punjab and Lahore and Delhi did not matter much to them.

The Sikhs again disappeared into the countryside. From now on they would attack and disappear. This over the years exhausted the Afghans who were robbed of their loot at ever few miles by smaller Sikh horse groups who depended more on speed than a pitched battle. Finally the Afghans decided Lahore was no longer a viable option to defend, just as the Marathas had learnt earlier.

In the turmoil the three Sikhs started to rule Lahore. By 1799 the Muslim elite invited Maharajah Ranjit Singh, who entered with their assistance and peace finally returned to the city and the Punjab. The ‘unknown’ century before 1799 is so similar to what is happening today in our land. Only we have to learn from history, not see it repeated.

Published in Dawn, April 2nd, 2017
 
Earlier article by the same writer:

https://www.dawn.com/news/1274359



The Marathas and the crafty ‘Arain’ from Sharakpur
Majid SheikhPublished Jul 31, 2016 07:05am


The death of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb in 1707AD unleashed in the Punjab an amazing variety of inter-related events that remain little researched. One such event was the capture of Lahore by the Maratha forces of Raghunath Rao and Malhar Rao Holkar, two commanders of the Pune-based Maratha’s ‘Peshwa’.

The reason the Marathas had ventured so far away from home was due primarily to the obsession of Aurangzeb to capture the southern portions of the subcontinent. For almost a century the Marathas and the Mughals had clashed without break, with both sides losing hundreds of thousands of men in battle. In the end the Marathas prevailed. In that time period in the Punjab the Sikhs, after decades of persecution, were organising after nearly 60 ‘jathas’, mostly mounted warriors, joined hands to form the formidable Sikh ‘khalsa’. This is where the role of the crafty ‘Arain’ from Sharakpur, near Lahore, Adina Beg Khan, comes to the fore.

Adina Beg Khan came to Lahore and by a combination of political skill, scholarship and military experience ended up as the Governor of Lahore, Jalandhar and Multan under the Afghan Abdali invaders. His amazing ability to read the unfolding, yet separate, forces of the Marathas and the Sikhs, led him to deciding to take a low-profile role by residing in Jullundur only. In control yet detached. As the Marathas overran Mughal-ruled Delhi, Adina Beg met them with an offer of assistance. By the same stroke he made peace with the Sikh, even though in the past he was their tormentor. Thus a loosely-knit alliance of Marathas and Sikhs, with Adina Beg as one of the commanders, headed towards the Punjab capital.

The Afghan rulers raised the cry of ‘jehad’, a typical ploy to overcome resistance from nationalistic Muslims, which further inflamed Sikh passions. The huge Maratha Army were thus joined by 15,000 Sikh horsemen, a formidable force beyond the capability of the Afghans to overcome. By this time the Sikhs had managed to form swift-moving ‘jathas’ of skilled horsemen to attack and retreat and to only keep on attacking and retreating. It was as if history was repeating itself. Ironically, the swift-moving Afghans under Mahmud of Ghanzi had overcome the slow-moving 600,000 army of Raja Jayapala of Lahore in 1007 in the Battle of Peshawar, a period when Lahore ruled both Afghanistan, Punjab and major parts of present-day India.

The Marathas had one major disadvantage, which the presence of the Sikhs had helped to overcome. They were far away from home with Pune as their capital and their lines of communication were more than stretched. The Sikhs knew not only the terrain well, but also knew where the sources of wealth lay. Adina Beg realised that the Afghans would be routed by this combination. Once Sirhind fell to the Marathas, the Afghan rulers Timur Shah and Jahan Khan fled Lahore. The prize of the Punjab lay before this massive army.

On the 2nd of April, 1858, the very first Maratha army entered Lahore. The Peshwa sitting in Pune remarked that they had exacted revenge for the capture of Lahore by Mahmud 700 years earlier from the great Hindushahi ruler Jayapala. Lahore had its first Maratha ruler.

As the Afghan forces fled, portions of the army of Adina Beg and the Sikhs of Rawalpindi and Attock chased them. They knew the terrain well and inflicted considerable damage on the invaders, who all fled to Afghanistan. At Lahore both the distance from home, as well as the weather, started to ‘demoralise’ the Marathas. Adina Beg and the Sikhs both understood that the Maratha forces could be tackled with a combination of patience and wearing-down.

The Marathas made a major mistake in under-estimating the power of the emerging Sikh ‘khalsa’. In a way, as most present-day scholars like J.L. Metha acknowledge, the Rajput Marathas suffered from a severe case of superiority complex. The Sikhs were Jats who thought it an affront to ask for help. Two proud people with fatal faults. In this state of an unwritten ‘mutual balance’ their relationship remained positive. It were the terrible demands of peace that brought forth their differences, almost like in recent times the US and the Russians joining hands against Hitler, only for peace to bring forth a rivalry seldom seen before. In the end the Maratha commander, Raghunath Rao decided to return to Pune, much against the wishes of the Peshwa, who immediately made Adina Beg Khan the ruler of Lahore, Multan and Jullundur. The Marathas had replaced the Afghans. For the Sikhs it was one foreigner replacing another.

The Sikhs did not like it and disassociated themselves from the Arain from Sharakpur. This situation brought to Lahore a new Maratha commander, Dattaji Scindia, who brought peace to the Punjab. The Sikhs under Jassa Singh Ahluwalia and Baba Ala Singh, the founder of present-day Patiala, decided to gather as much of the wealth their battles had brought forth and disappear. The Marathas could not gather even the 75 lakh rupees a year money they expected from the loot of the Punjab. They decided to return to their Maratha lands and forget about, as their Peshwa was to describe, the ‘mad mad Maratha venture to capture Lahore’.

On this decision the Afghans quickly returned to Lahore and some even went to Pune to ask the Peshwa to allow them to rule on his behalf promising him huge amounts. The Marathas fell for this Afghan guise. Adina Beg Khan now had to face not only the rising power of the Sikhs, but also the angry Afghans out to seek revenge for taking Lahore from them. But before his governorship could be overthrown he died on the 15th of September, 1758. The forces under the Arain from Sharakpur seemed to just disappear. In the field were left the rising power of the Sikhs, and the looting forces of Afghans in decline.

It was to take another 40 years of strife and Afghan invasions for the Sikhs to finally prevail. The Punjabis had after 800 years managed to regain power over their own lands. It must be said that communal partisan feeling certainly existed then, as it does today. Adina Beg Khan had probably escaped the terrible times that followed. Maybe he found peace in his own way.

Published in Dawn, July 31st, 2016
 
In this period we will concentrate on a very short time period in the middle of a little recognised force that ruled Lahore from 1758 to 1759. They decisively knocked out the powerful invading forces of the Afghan Abdalis, chasing them beyond the mountains of Peshawar. On the 20th of April, 1757, the Maratha forces under their general Raghu Nath Rao, an immensely brave Rajput Rao warrior, attacked Lahore and captured it. The Peshwa’s commander entered the Lahore Fort.
Marathas never crossed river Chenab let alone chasing Afghans beyond mountains of Peshawar. The tradition is that they reached up to river Indus but this claim has been dismissed by renowned historian Sir Jadunath Sarkar and is even doubted by some Maratha historians.

Also "decisively knocked out" wording is merely exaggeration. Marathas themselves were invaders. And Afghan forces stationed in Punjab (which were not large by any means) got overwhelmed by a very large army of Marathas because locals (Adina Beg and Sikhs) were assisting them.

The entire article by this Majid Shaikh is garbage when it comes to authenticity and accuracy . For example he is calling Raghunathrao a "brave Rajput"......Because of "Rao" he is assuming Ragunathrao must be a Rajput. The Baji Rao and his family were Brahmans

, a period when Lahore ruled both Afghanistan, Punjab and major parts of present-day India.
What an ignorant author. It was Lahor (Chotta Lahor, Swabi, KP) which was capital of Jaypala not the present-day Lahore city of Punjab

Adina Beg Khan came to Lahore and by a combination of political skill, scholarship and military experience ended up as the Governor of Lahore, Jalandhar and Multan under the Afghan Abdali invaders.
The garbage-historian is saying that Adina Beg ascended himself under "Afghan invaders". Bakwas kar raha hey. Adina Beg made progress under Mughals. He did not owe his rise to Afghans. He was already faujdar of Jalandhar doab when Afghan directly took over rule of Punjab from Mughals.
 
Last edited:
What an ignorant author. It was Lahor (Chotta Lahor, Swabi, KP) which was capital of Jaypala not the present-day Lahore city of Punjab

I doubt village named like Lahor in swabi near indus was capital. Jayapala capital was in Peshawar and Lahore as per sources on internet. Though he got all wrong on Adina ascending under Abdali.

In AD 645, when Chinese pilgrim Xuanzang was passing through the Uttarapatha, Udabhanda or Udabhandapura was the place of residence or secondary capital of emperor of Kapisa which then dominated over 10 neighboring states comprising Lampaka, Nagara, Gandhara and Varna (Bannu) and probably also Jaguda. About Gandhara, the pilgrim says that its capital was Purushapura; the royal family was extinct and country was subject to Kapisa; the towns and villages were desolate and the inhabitants were very few. It seems that under pressure from Arabs in the southwest and the Turks in the north, the kings of Kapisa had left their western possessions in the hands of their viceroys and made Udabhanda their principal seat of residence. The reason why Udabhandapura was selected in preference to Peshawar is at present unknown but it is possible that the new city of Udabhanda was built by Kapisa rulers for strategic reasons.[71]

In AD 671 Muslim armies seized Kabul and the capital was moved to Udabhandapura.[72]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hund,_Khyber_Pakhtunkhwa

According to this udabhandapura is current day Hund in Swabi.
 
I doubt village named like Lahor in swabi near indus was capital. Jayapala capital was in Peshawar and Lahore as per sources on internet. Though he got all wrong on Adina ascending under Abdali.
This Lahor of Swabi is now a village but at this site there was a city/town back then. There are archeological sites and ruins there. Lahor along with Hund (which was old capital) in the vicinity were important cities of Hindu Shahis. I will give the reference of prominent historian Ahmad Hasan Dani in coming days.
 
This Lahor of Swabi is now a village but at this site there was a city/town back then. There are archeological sites and ruins there. Lahor along with Hund (which was old capital) in the vicinity were important cities of Hindu Shahis. I will give the reference of prominent historian Ahmad Hasan Dani in coming days.

Hasan Dani talk about Hund which is identified with ancient Udhandpura and not Lahor. Can't find anything on Lahor.

HUND:
Standing on the banks of the River Indus in Hund village, Swabi, it is difficult to get an inkling of the magnificent past of this hamlet and how it dominated the history of the subcontinent once upon a time.

An intriguing symbol in this village is a Corinthian column, standing in the courtyard of a domed red brick building.

One has to travel about six kilometres through a mustard plantation and wheat fields before entering this village, which is nondescript and seems to be stuck in the winter of its past.

Before walking the narrow muddy streets of Hund, you will likely pass oxen pulling out water from wells. Once on your way to the river through these streets, you will come across the building with the Greek column in front and spacious lawns. The building houses Hund Museum, which opened a few years back.

This small village is said to be the capital of Gandhara civilisation under the Hindu Shahi dynasty in the 9th century CE.

Inside the museum, galleries of coins and Buddhist artefacts weave a colourful image of rich the cultural mosaic which flourished under the Gandhara civilisation.

“Charsadda was one of the first capitals of the Gandhara civilisation and it used to be known as Pushkalavati,” said Muhammad Asif Raza, the museum in-charge and a graduate of archaeology from the University of Peshawar.

“The capital moved to Peshawar under the Kushan Empire, and finally the Hindu Shahi dynasty made Hund the centre of the magnificent Gandhara civilisation,” he added.

He explained that Alexander the Great had spent a night in the village, before entering the Indian plains. “He entered Bajaur from Afghanistan, from where he travelled to Dir and Swat and left for India via Hund after constructing a bridge,” said Asif, adding that Syed Ahmed Shaheed Barelvi, the leader of the Tehrik Mujahideeen, had also stayed in this fort during his wars against Sikhs.

Just opposite the museum, remains of the Mughal fort dating back to the rule of Emperor Akbar are visible. However, after entering inside the wall, one enters a hamlet inside the old fort.

Kashif Khan, a local resident, explained that this small neighbourhood of around 60 households was once encircled by a wall, a part of which has been demolished now.

“Before the Grand Trunk Road was built in the 1580s, the road to India passed through this village,” he said, adding that the village has sunk into oblivion ever since the Attock crossing opened.

Dr Ahmed Hasan Dani, a chronicler of Gandhara civilisation, writes that the village was “a medieval wail hind where people used to cross the river with the help of pots.”

Asif explains that clay pots tied together served as a bridge to cross the Indus.

Dani also writes that the majority of invaders, including Scythians, Kushans, Mahmud of Ghazni, Shahabuddin Ghauri, Taimur Babar as well as Chinese pilgrims passed through Hund to enter India.

He said that the Mongol invader Changez Khan (Genghis Khan) also followed Khwarzim Shah up to Hund, before the prince jumped into the Indus River on his way to India.

It is often said that history repeats itself and present day Hund is a testimony to this fact. From the courtyard of the Hund Museum, one can see vehicles crossing the Peshawar-Islamabad Motorway Bridge over the River Indus in the winter haze.

It was in 1586 when Akbar built the Attock crossing on the River Indus and brought fishermen from Benaras to build a bridge. The construction of GT Road and Attock crossing pushed Hund into oblivion. The new motorway bridge signifies, however, that history is retracing its steps to Hund.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 1st, 2012.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/314669/lost-glory-in-hund-retracing-the-steps-of-history/

He shifted his capital to Lahore after Ghaznavi attacks but stayed in Udhandpura to fight muslim armies advancing.
 
Hasan Dani talk about Hund which is identified with ancient Udhandpura and not Lahor. Can't find anything on Lahor.

HUND:
Standing on the banks of the River Indus in Hund village, Swabi, it is difficult to get an inkling of the magnificent past of this hamlet and how it dominated the history of the subcontinent once upon a time.

An intriguing symbol in this village is a Corinthian column, standing in the courtyard of a domed red brick building.

One has to travel about six kilometres through a mustard plantation and wheat fields before entering this village, which is nondescript and seems to be stuck in the winter of its past.

Before walking the narrow muddy streets of Hund, you will likely pass oxen pulling out water from wells. Once on your way to the river through these streets, you will come across the building with the Greek column in front and spacious lawns. The building houses Hund Museum, which opened a few years back.

This small village is said to be the capital of Gandhara civilisation under the Hindu Shahi dynasty in the 9th century CE.

Inside the museum, galleries of coins and Buddhist artefacts weave a colourful image of rich the cultural mosaic which flourished under the Gandhara civilisation.

“Charsadda was one of the first capitals of the Gandhara civilisation and it used to be known as Pushkalavati,” said Muhammad Asif Raza, the museum in-charge and a graduate of archaeology from the University of Peshawar.

“The capital moved to Peshawar under the Kushan Empire, and finally the Hindu Shahi dynasty made Hund the centre of the magnificent Gandhara civilisation,” he added.

He explained that Alexander the Great had spent a night in the village, before entering the Indian plains. “He entered Bajaur from Afghanistan, from where he travelled to Dir and Swat and left for India via Hund after constructing a bridge,” said Asif, adding that Syed Ahmed Shaheed Barelvi, the leader of the Tehrik Mujahideeen, had also stayed in this fort during his wars against Sikhs.

Just opposite the museum, remains of the Mughal fort dating back to the rule of Emperor Akbar are visible. However, after entering inside the wall, one enters a hamlet inside the old fort.

Kashif Khan, a local resident, explained that this small neighbourhood of around 60 households was once encircled by a wall, a part of which has been demolished now.

“Before the Grand Trunk Road was built in the 1580s, the road to India passed through this village,” he said, adding that the village has sunk into oblivion ever since the Attock crossing opened.

Dr Ahmed Hasan Dani, a chronicler of Gandhara civilisation, writes that the village was “a medieval wail hind where people used to cross the river with the help of pots.”

Asif explains that clay pots tied together served as a bridge to cross the Indus.

Dani also writes that the majority of invaders, including Scythians, Kushans, Mahmud of Ghazni, Shahabuddin Ghauri, Taimur Babar as well as Chinese pilgrims passed through Hund to enter India.

He said that the Mongol invader Changez Khan (Genghis Khan) also followed Khwarzim Shah up to Hund, before the prince jumped into the Indus River on his way to India.

It is often said that history repeats itself and present day Hund is a testimony to this fact. From the courtyard of the Hund Museum, one can see vehicles crossing the Peshawar-Islamabad Motorway Bridge over the River Indus in the winter haze.

It was in 1586 when Akbar built the Attock crossing on the River Indus and brought fishermen from Benaras to build a bridge. The construction of GT Road and Attock crossing pushed Hund into oblivion. The new motorway bridge signifies, however, that history is retracing its steps to Hund.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 1st, 2012.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/314669/lost-glory-in-hund-retracing-the-steps-of-history/

He shifted his capital to Lahore after Ghaznavi attacks but stayed in Udhandpura to fight muslim armies advancing.
Modern historians , who say Lahore of Punjab was meant, have based their assertions on Tarikh-i-Ferishta. But Ferishta says ;

"The Afghans having procured reinforcements from Khulij, Ghoor, and Kabul, to the number of four thousand men, marched against the Indian forces. The two armies fought, in the five ensuing months, seventy actions ; but the winter setting in severely, the Indians were compelled to retreat to Lahore, an object which they effected with great difficulty. In the following spring the Indians again took the field, under their former general. The Afghans met them on a plain between Kirman (Kurram) and Pishawur, where several indecisive actions took place, till at length the rainy season being about to commence, the Indians took the opportunity of a temporary advantage which they had gained over the Afghans to retreat by forced marches, so as to cross the Neelab (Indus) while yet fordable. The same cause also induced the Mahomedans to return within their frontiers. About this period some disputes arising between the Gukkurs and the Raja of Lahore, this race formed a treaty of alliance, defensive and offensive with the Afghans, who compelled the Raja of Lahore to submit to terms from the Gukkurs, to whom he could otherwise himself have dictated conditions."

Ferishta was in possession of very early documents which are no longer extant. He himself might have assumed that the famous Lahore of his times in meant. But from the above passage, its obvious it was Lahor of Swabi . The action is taking place in Peshawar and Hindu Shahi forces would retreat to nearby Lahor of Swabi rather than all the way to Lahore of present-day Punjab.
 
Modern historians , who say Lahore of Punjab was meant, have based their assertions on Tarikh-i-Ferishta. But Ferishta says ;

"The Afghans having procured reinforcements from Khulij, Ghoor, and Kabul, to the number of four thousand men, marched against the Indian forces. The two armies fought, in the five ensuing months, seventy actions ; but the winter setting in severely, the Indians were compelled to retreat to Lahore, an object which they effected with great difficulty. In the following spring the Indians again took the field, under their former general. The Afghans met them on a plain between Kirman (Kurram) and Pishawur, where several indecisive actions took place, till at length the rainy season being about to commence, the Indians took the opportunity of a temporary advantage which they had gained over the Afghans to retreat by forced marches, so as to cross the Neelab (Indus) while yet fordable. The same cause also induced the Mahomedans to return within their frontiers. About this period some disputes arising between the Gukkurs and the Raja of Lahore, this race formed a treaty of alliance, defensive and offensive with the Afghans, who compelled the Raja of Lahore to submit to terms from the Gukkurs, to whom he could otherwise himself have dictated conditions."

Ferishta was in possession of very early documents which are no longer extant. He himself might have assumed that the famous Lahore of his times in meant. But from the above passage, its obvious it was Lahor of Swabi . The action is taking place in Peshawar and Hindu Shahi forces would retreat to nearby Lahor of Swabi rather than all the way to Lahore of present-day Punjab.

Both Hund/Udhanpura and Lahor are 5 km away from each other in Swabi district. Why he would shift capital from Udhanpura to place few km away for safety reasons?
 
Both Hund/Udhanpura and Lahor are 5 km away from each other in Swabi district. Why he would shift capital from Udhanpura to place few km away for safety reasons?
Its only Tarikh-i-Ferishta which calls him "Raja of Lahore"..........Utbi, the official history of Mahmud Ghaznavi and a contemporary source, doesnt use such title for him and mention "Waihand" (Hund) as his capital.

And it was only in 991 A.D that Hindu Shahi kingdom was expanded eastward beyond river Chenab. The point is, the author of the articles in this thread, is very wrong in bragging that Lahore of Punjab ruled over Afghanistan.

1.png
 
Its only Tarikh-i-Ferishta which calls him "Raja of Lahore"..........Utbi, the official history of Mahmud Ghaznavi and a contemporary source, doesnt use such title for him and mention "Waihand" (Hund) as his capital.

And it was only in 991 A.D that Hindu Shahi kingdom was expanded eastward beyond river Chenab. The point is, the author of the articles in this thread, is very wrong in bragging that Lahore of Punjab ruled over Afghanistan.

View attachment 407584

Hidu shahis kept shifting their capitals to east as they lost ground to arabs and later on turkish muslim. Which mean hindu shahis never ruled Kabul and lahore at the same time. And Lahore had other hindu rajas kingdoms when hindu shahis capital was Kapisa and then Kabul.

this map is wrong then

Hindu-Shahi-dynasty.png
 
IMG_20170705_114733.png

Malharrao of House of Holkars.

460px-Ragonath_Row_Ballajee.jpg
Raghunathrao of house of Bhat Peshwas



Any Pakistani missile named 'Raghunath' or 'Malhar' or 'Sadashiv' or 'Vishwas' or 'Samsher Bahadur' or 'Ibrahim Khan'?

......... Ooops I forgot they have Chosen Abdali...
IMG_20170705_144139.png




How about a missile named 'Ranjith' or 'Baba Banda Bahadur' or after any Sikh gurus?

My bad. Who am I talking to.



PS. Ironically Raghunathrao is not a very respected figure because of what he did in later life, and Malharrao despite all his great achievements did a grave mistake of patronizing a snake called 'Najib'
 
Last edited:
Hidu shahis kept shifting their capitals to east as they lost ground to arabs and later on turkish muslim. Which mean hindu shahis never ruled Kabul and lahore at the same time. And Lahore had other hindu rajas kingdoms when hindu shahis capital was Kapisa and then Kabul.

this map is wrong then

Hindu-Shahi-dynasty.png
This is the correct map of hindusahi
images

Out of 500 years of life this emoired ruled afghan mainland. But when ruling family (kshatriya to brahmin) changed they lost west afghanistan quickly and took over ounjab.

View attachment 408445
Malharrao of House of Holkars.

View attachment 408446 Raghunathrao of house of Bhat Peshwas



Any Pakistani missile named 'Raghunath' or 'Malhar' or 'Sadashiv' or 'Vishwas' or 'Samsher Bahadur' or 'Ibrahim Khan'?

......... Ooops they have Chosen Abdali...



How about a missile named 'Ranjith' or 'Baba Banda Bahadur' or after any Sikh gurus?

My bad. Who am I talking to.



PS. Ironically Raghunathrao is not a very respected figure because of what he did in later life, and Malharrao despite all his great achievements did a grave mistake of patronizing a snake called 'Najib'
30% pakisanis are afghans while 0% are marathi.
 
From wikipedia



History

• Death of Baba Banda Singh Bahadur 1716

• Maharaja Ranjit Singh unites the misls into the Sikh Empire 1799



Misl generally refers to the sovereign states of the Sikh Confederacy,[1][2] that rose during the 18th century in the Punjab region of the Indian subcontinent.


The Sikh Empire (also Sikh Khalsa Raj, Sarkar-i-Khalsa or Pañjab (Punjab) Empire), was a major power in the Indian subcontinent, formed under the leadership of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, who established a secular empire based in the Punjab.[2] The empire existed from 1799, when Ranjit Singh captured Lahore, to 1849
 

Back
Top Bottom