What's new

ICJ hearing on Kulbhushan Jadhav case : News, Updates & Discussions

The 1st round goes to India.
Now the facts are ....
1. No evidence presented in open court that he is any sort of spy.
2. We dont know whether he is alive.
3. PA has hanged its PM in the past without batting a eye.
4. PA has hanged more than a 100 of its own citizens in similar "trials" in less than a year , and their countrymen are fine with it.
Summary is that its basically a show put up by the agency that matters in Pakistan.
We cannot judge this by our standards of 3 hanged in 10 years.
Pakistan is not a normal country by our standards and we should accept ky's loss as unfortunate and plan our answer.

You did not hang killers of SIKHS massacre in 84; the reason India hanged only three persons in 10 years that Hindus extremists are involved in killing

Well it can be said as a temporary stay is granted yet execution is being proven as dismissed.



No it does not and Pakistan can still deny the same. There are certain citations and other rulings to prove as such. However stay is granted yet in easy words, it is still up-to Pakistan either entertain ICJ or not.

When is final decision ?
 
What's really the end goal here?

Consular access isn't going to change the outcome of the sentence, maybe changed to life.

India will go claiming torture (whether true or not). And Pakistan will say whatever.

BTW what is the end goal of enmity between the two rivals ???

It is just point scoring and planning, then winning battles and finally vanquishing your enemy.

India won a small battle that's it !!!

Lol its just one hearing you idiots even you could had read the written script which he did in his allocated 2 hrs time.

How come you couldn't find anybody to write a decent script ??
 
The 1st round goes to India.
Now the facts are ....
1. No evidence presented in open court that he is any sort of spy.
2. We dont know whether he is alive.
3. PA has hanged its PM in the past without batting a eye.
4. PA has hanged more than a 100 of its own citizens in similar "trials" in less than a year , and their countrymen are fine with it.
Summary is that its basically a show put up by the agency that matters in Pakistan.
We cannot judge this by our standards of 3 hanged in 10 years.
Pakistan is not a normal country by our standards and we should accept ky's loss as unfortunate and plan our answer.

Says the man from a country where a mass murderer is made PM and a saffron robed corpse raping hindu fanatic like Yogi is elected CM
 
Indian side clearly were well prepared and presented the case ..Pakistani side was unprepared and did not responded as a state ...
Even if India loose from now onward they have won the confidence of there people and operatives that they will not be disown and left to mercy...
No doubt India is well ahead in term of diplomacy at international level..
Indias state works in organised manner when it comes to national interest while Pakistanis are more influenced toward there petty internal politics ...
It clearly a shame that we can't find a one lawyer in our country to represent the case ...
 
This case he has fought in ICJ is in the national interest and the nation will remember his this great gesture for the country

:D our was also contesting in the national interests of India so Sharif was generous enough to shower our money.
Nawaz Sharif has a big heart for anything from Qatar

That means Iran is also a party in case.
@Serpentine


I have been saying this from day one.

Iran should respond on this and should be made a party.
 
Harish Salve being appreciated by the Pakistanis.

Correction 1 rupee and 61 paise in PKR.
By the way, with 1 rupee he can buy naranga mittayi, the price haven't changed much you get four for 1INR. Ci5wkqHXAAEQ581.jpg
 
I said it before this crap started that the merasi of sharif tubbar will say Alhumdulillah mian ji released kulbhushan.
 
Pakistan Lawyer Charged 5Cr. to represent, But Indian 1 INR proved heavier then 5 Cr
Incorrect. INR 4.2 or pakistani close to 7.

FYI- numbers are in crores

How come you couldn't find anybody to write a decent script ??
OFF-TOPIC.

They will have to get AID for which they have to send some minister. I have always been curious about the trip name.
 
Indian side clearly were well prepared and presented the case ..Pakistani side was unprepared and did not responded as a state ...
Even if India loose from now onward they have won the confidence of there people and operatives that they will not be disown and left to mercy...
No doubt India is well ahead in term of diplomacy at international level..
Indias state works in organised manner when it comes to national interest while Pakistanis are more influenced toward there petty internal politics ...
It clearly a shame that we can't find a one lawyer in our country to represent the case ...

:cheers:
 
The 1st round goes to India.
Now the facts are ....
1. No evidence presented in open court that he is any sort of spy.
2. We dont know whether he is alive.
3. PA has hanged its PM in the past without batting a eye.
4. PA has hanged more than a 100 of its own citizens in similar "trials" in less than a year , and their countrymen are fine with it.
Summary is that its basically a show put up by the agency that matters in Pakistan.
We cannot judge this by our standards of 3 hanged in 10 years.
Pakistan is not a normal country by our standards and we should accept ky's loss as unfortunate and plan our answer.
Off course Pakistan is not normal country by your pathetic standards,
We don't kill people just for eating their diet or even transporting some livestock.
We don't take revenge on a whole community and kill thousands for the mistake of a few... so much for batting eye.
Our army certainly hasn't trampled other's religious monuments and killed thousands.
We certainly can't match the Indian version of Gujarat genocide.
We don't hound guest players and performers out of our country.
We are not obsessed with a country five times smaller than us.
Above all, even in our forums, we allow any faker or stray to join.
 
Being one of the top lawyer of our country, i think he has more than enough money for himself..He just wanted to some national service,good example for many elites of our society.

Harish Salve is the HIGHEST PAID LAWYER in India.

He charges INR 1 crore per hearing.

He's the man who got Salman Khan out of Jail.

Mukesh Ambani paid him 2.5 million $ as fees just to fight off Anil Ambani when they were in dispute.
 
You did not hang killers of SIKHS massacre in 84; the reason India hanged only three persons in 10 years that Hindus extremists are involved in killing



When is final decision ?
And I am here as a proof of Indian brutality, I served in Indian army but when Sikh started freedom struggle Hindu officers and Jawan starts asking our love for country we forced to prove our Desh-Bakti by killing our own youth but I refuse and as result they court martialled me and sent me in a jail by labelling me pro Khalistani.

And now I am pro Khalistan and Pro Kashmir.

Need of hour... police muqabla
No need Pakistan can hang him any time, as i mentioned earlier Pakistan could avoid this by just refusing to became party but they decided to challenge Indian in ICJ.
 
Kulbhushan Jadhav case: Reversal of sentence not a foregone conclusion, says expert
Sachin Parashar| TNN | Updated: May 18, 2017, 09.57 PM IST


NEW DELHI: While India has got the provisional measures it had sought from ICJ when it initiated proceedings against Pakistan in Kulbhushan Jadhav case on May 8, a much tougher test lies ahead at the international Court which will now consider the issues involved in greater details.

As per the procedures involved, ICJ President Ronny Abraham is now expected to meet representatives of both nations to prepare a timeline for filing of written submissions to take the case forward. Pakistan is likely to challenge ICJ's jurisdiction and, in that case, the court may want to settle this issue first before going ahead with India's petition.

India's final objective is that ICJ set aside Jadhav's conviction and order his release. According to international lawyer and former law clerk at ICJ Shashank Kumar, who had predicted that ICJ was not going to be influenced by Pakistan's arguments about jurisdiction and lack of urgency in the matter, it is far from clear whether or not the Court can grant such a request by India. The ICJ, which has acknowledged Pakistan's violation of VCCR, may simply ask Islamabad to review and reconsider possibly through a domestic process the Jadhav case.

"In past cases concerning denial of consular access, the Court has usually ordered the respondent country to undertake a 'review and reconsideration' of the sentence and conviction by means of its choosing, eg., through the domestic judicial process, taking into account the violation of the rights under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations," said Kumar.

"Leaving aside the fact that all the previous cases involved the United States as the respondent, were the Court to award similar relief in this case, Pakistan could simply undertake such review and reconsideration under its domestic legal system," he added.

There is of course no guarantee that such review by Pakistan would lead to Jadhav's release, as desired by India.

According to Kumar, at this stage, it would probably be in India's interest to stretch the ICJ case as long as possible, as this would at least ensure that in keeping with today's order, Jadhav is not executed by Pakistan while the case is pending before the ICJ.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom