What's new

Does India have a history of 10000 years?

Ask to your ancestors chine.se, we n9t only civilized you but also conquered you without sending single soldier.

Civilized? Our writing system is close to 4000 years old, your oldest written script is barely 2000 years old. The conquered ones are your ancestors, Rig Vedas and Sanskrit all came from the Aryan.
 
Prove it that it is Hindu civilization and with neutral source and Indus didn't start from India and it start from China, by your logic this civilization is Chinese then. Grown up and follow international standard. And for your knowledge please note that Indus river flow only 5% in India and 93% in Pakistan and 2% in China

800px-Indus_river.svg.png

You are asking me to prove that the Sun exist.

Everything within the walls of the Himalayas and three oceans surrounding the land was called Hindu.
 
Last edited:
You are asking me to prove that the Sun exist.

Everything withing the walls of the Himalayas and three oceans surrounding the land was called Hindu.

Prove your big claim and don't go here and there
 
Our writing system is close to 4000 years old, your oldest written script is barely 2000 years old. The conquered ones are your ancestors, Rig Vedas and Sanskrit all came from the Aryan.

Your writing system is hieroglyphics.

We abandoned that system 3000 years back and create a new one called the Brahmi script.

The oldest written evidence of Brahmi script is from 500 BC.

main-qimg-ef86e3bdee42e17ca8fe27e0cebf9962-c


Prove your big claim and don't go here and there

There is nothing to prove. Hindu civilization existed in India for thousands of years.

To put it in better words, the civilization that existed in India for thousands of years was called "Hindu"
 
Last edited:
Your writing system is hieroglyphics.

We abandoned that system 3000 years back and create a new one called the Brahmi script.

The oldest written evidence of Brahmi script is from 500 BC.

main-qimg-ef86e3bdee42e17ca8fe27e0cebf9962-c




There is nothing to prove. Hindu civilization existed in India for thousands of years.

To put it in better words, the civilization that existed in India for thousands of years we called "Hindu"

Prove it that Indus valley civilization is Hindu civilization. I don't believe in anyone words without proper references. My question is very simple. prove it that you are right and i will accept it without saying a word if your statement is true based on neutral sources.

Prove it that Indus valley civilization is Hindu civilization. I don't believe in anyone words without proper references. My question is very simple. prove it that you are right and i will accept it without saying a word if your statement is true based on neutral sources.

Regarding scripts. It didn't show that this scripts is belong to hindu. Arabic scripts is older then Islam and we can't say that Islam invented Arabic and same apply to Aramaic in which the original Bible written
 
Evidence of the reach of Hindu civilization can be estimated by the finding of Brahmi script in Turkey , qatar and Egypt.

Turkey,

2006071603952001.jpg


Egypt,

e6e3d0970bf5f6e25c5bd11a36d68efd.jpg


Qatar,

main-qimg-0675321d28a6af018180f8356cc09b98-c
 
Your writing system is hieroglyphics.

We abandoned that system 3000 years back and create a new one called the Brahmi script.

The oldest written evidence of Brahmi script is from 500 BC.

main-qimg-ef86e3bdee42e17ca8fe27e0cebf9962-c




There is nothing to prove. Hindu civilization existed in India for thousands of years.

To put it in better words, the civilization that existed in India for thousands of years we called "Hindu"


Why would you abandon it if it were truly a proven script? Indus inscription is not a script, which is why it cannot be deciphered.

Brahmi script originated from Aramaic script in Mesopotamia, it is barely 2000 years old.
 
Prove it that Indus valley civilization is Hindu civilization. I don't believe in anyone words without proper references. My question is very simple. prove it that you are right and i will accept it without saying a word if your statement is true based on neutral sources.

What else can it be ?

Hindu sources have put hinduism in the Indian subcontinent for more than 15,000 years.

There is no evidence of any other religion other than the Dharmic religion in the region.

Why would you abandon it if it were truly a proven script? Indus inscription is not a script, which is why it cannot be deciphered.

Brahmi script originated from Aramaic script in Mesopotamia, it is barely 2000 years old.

Are you seriously asking me why anyone would abandon Hieroglyphics for a modern script ?

Contemporary scripts have advantages over hieroglyphs such as ease of learning, the ability to express new ideas without requiring new characters, and they are easy to typography and print , thus to mass distribution of written material to the general public.


I have provided evidence of Brahmi script from 500 BC.

Pretty much all Indian script have evolved out of Brahmi so its foolish to claim its origin it outside India. The same way its foolish to claim that sanskrit was from outside India.
 
Civilized? Our writing system is close to 4000 years old, your oldest written script is barely 2000 years old. The conquered ones are your ancestors, Rig Vedas and Sanskrit all came from the Aryan.
And I am a brahmin. Script means nothing we conquered you and civilized you.
 
It was always your people who came here, accepted our teaching and even stole our documents. Even today your people visit india on holy pilgrimage.
 
And I am a brahmin. Script means nothing we conquered you and civilized you.

Brahmin, so you're Aryan descendant fine. But still you did not civilize us. Yellow River civilization, we are Confucian civilization.

Script means everything. To civilize, you need to be able to write.
 
Last edited:
You are asking me to prove that the Sun exist.

Everything within the walls of the Himalayas and three oceans surrounding the land was called Hindu.

no, Hindu word was used for people of indus by Iranian, sindh till Taxila was eastern most part of Iranian empire and it was called Hindush, its people were called Hindu and all these were derived from Sindhu..

Use of Hindu for gangalander started after Arabic, Turkic start calling them Hindustani bcoz of their same paganism which you borrowed from us.
 
Last edited:
Brahmin, so you're Aryan descendant fine. But still you did not civilize us. We are Confucian civilization.

Script means everything. To civilize, you need to be able to write.

The Saptarsi calendar of the Hindus measured a cycle over 27,000 years and was based on the Precession of the earth. IT was literally a star map and the measure of time was based on the movement of stars.

How can this be possible without a written script ? Its impossible.

And this was the calendar in use before the Kali calander which itself stared in 3102 BC.

no, Hindu word was used for people of indus by Iranian, sindh till Taxila was eastern most part of Iranian empire and it was called Hindush, its people were called Hindu and all these were derived from Sindhu..

Use of Hindu for gangalander started after Arabic, Turkic start calling them Hindustani bcoz of their same paganism which you borrowed from us.

Like India, the world Hindu is only useful to identify the culture and civilization in the land within the walls of the Himalayas and the 3 oceans.

A rose by any other name will still smell the same.


Call them sanathana dharma if that makes you feel any better.
 
no, Hindu word was used for people of indus by Iranian, sindh till Taxila was eastern m.ost part of Iranian empire and it was called Hindush, its people were called Hindu and all these were derived from Sindhu..

Use of Hindu for gangalander started after Arabic, Turkic start calling them Hindustani bcoz of their same paganism which you borrowed from us.
And you borrowed same paganism from Aryans. We simply we took back what simply was ours. Only 38% Pakistanis are from vedic lineage
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom