What's new

Pakistan to have 200 nuclear weapons by 2020: US think tank

let hope for the best, but i am 101% sure he will start the war with pakistan.

Have u seen one indian demanding a war here?
Even hardcore hindutvadis don't want one,trust me on this.And please change ur extremely negative outlook on india,a war will not happen now,the days are long gone.
 
Not at all,our govt neither is foolish nor has the balls to start a fight.

Infact, if anything.. starting a full on fight would be the worst for India. All the effort made to prop the economy up will go down for another ten years. And this is sans nuclear weapons.
 

don't go by media...india is not threatened by pak. i can assure you that.

yes pak can spell some trouble for india especially in kashmir, apart from that i don't see pak looming large on india's policy makers.
 
Infact, if anything.. starting a full on fight would be the worst for India. All the effort made to prop the economy up will go down for another ten years. And this is sans nuclear weapons.

Of course,same reason why china ,though it can defeat us any time of the day will never do such stupidity.No one loves bloodshed except maybe sheikh rashid,zaid hamid and to a much lesser degree subramanian swamy:sarcastic:
 
Infact, if anything.. starting a full on fight would be the worst for India. All the effort made to prop the economy up will go down for another ten years. And this is sans nuclear weapons.

yes..india has lot more to loose in indo-pak war than pak.
 
TILL DATE ALL THE WARS ARE STARTED BY PAKISTAN.

Sure, if crossing into a nations border is not considered starting a war by you.. moral ideals are flexible from person to person.. in this case.. you have none.
What you state is applicable for 47,65 and Kargil.. but in 71.. the IA had already begun its irregular push through BD embedded with the Mukti Bahni.. so the aggressor in this case was India.
 
Of course,same reason why china ,though it can defeat us any time of the day will never do such stupidity.No one loves bloodshed except maybe sheikh rashid,zaid hamid and to a much lesser degree subramanian swamy:sarcastic:
yes..india has lot more to loose in indo-pak war than pak.

That idea is lost on people like Swamy.. and Hamid. That while Pakistan will be defeated in any conventional war.. the result of it on the Indian economy and the lives of many Indians will have much more of a collective impact than say on the lives of the common Pakistani. Take it a game of snakes and ladders...
game_snakes_ladders.lrg.jpg




for Pakistan, Sets say Pakistan was on 69.. it will slide down to 9.. a loss of 60... Yet, India being on 95.. will head down to 24.. a loss of 71... even with the best.. India sliding down from 92 to 51.. is unacceptable to the Indian "establishment/Think Tank".

These calculation have been done by India, and it is precisely why it too knows that future conflicts have to be kept short and very focused on goals...and at best avoided at all costs.
 
As an additional FYI... if you ever hear the old "Ghazwa e Hind" story.. remind people that in all of Islamic theology and history. The term Ghazwa refers to a battle in which the Prophet participated...and since he is not returning.. there really cannot be a Ghazwa e Hind.
 
Have u seen one indian demanding a war here?
Even hardcore hindutvadis don't want one,trust me on this.And please change ur extremely negative outlook on india,a war will not happen now,the days are long gone.
:) It's up to you, believe it or not but your media is preparing your nation for a war with pakistan.
 
As an additional FYI... if you ever hear the old "Ghazwa e Hind" story.. remind people that in all of Islamic theology and history. The term Ghazwa refers to a battle in which the Prophet participated...and since he is not returning.. there really cannot be a Ghazwa e Hind.

I agree,there is a reason we could not retaliate even after mumbai attacks even though the identity of perpetrators was well established.

I am just interested in nawaz opening punjab border for trade,whats stopping him from doing it?:hitwall:By that i mean giving mfn status and including many more things than what are included in the list up for trade at this juncture.
 
As an additional FYI... if you ever hear the old "Ghazwa e Hind" story.. remind people that in all of Islamic theology and history. The term Ghazwa refers to a battle in which the Prophet participated...and since he is not returning.. there really cannot be a Ghazwa e Hind.
dude i agree with u on this particular term wt about hadis on this topic wt does it say
 
LMFAO..... you just killed ZH and other IS wannabe's in one paragraph! :sarcastic:

As an additional FYI... if you ever hear the old "Ghazwa e Hind" story.. remind people that in all of Islamic theology and history. The term Ghazwa refers to a battle in which the Prophet participated...and since he is not returning.. there really cannot be a Ghazwa e Hind.
 
:) It's up to you, believe it or not but your media is preparing your nation for a war with pakistan.

Dude,the most popular channel right now in india is zindagi channel showing pakistani shows.
Ask this to any neutral indian.

No one even thinks of war.I would assume no ordinary pakistani would think as well.
 
@Oscar What will happen should there be a major terror attack on India like 26/11

Will Nuclear blackmail work for ever

India believes that for all the Nuclear posturing by Pakistan ;
Pakistan is not suicidal ; but it does love to needle India
 
@Oscar What will happen should there be a major terror attack on India like 26/11

Will Nuclear blackmail work for ever

India believes that for all the Nuclear posturing by Pakistan ;
Pakistan is not suicidal ; but it does love to needle India
Ask your gov
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom