What's new

Pak couple sues American airline for racial profiling

Status
Not open for further replies.

relativiti

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 13, 2011
Messages
396
Reaction score
0
NEW YORK: A Pakistan couple are suing American Airlines after they were handcuffed and escorted out of a plane based on a phone call with a hijacking threat, which turned out to be a hoax.

"The only reason police went to them is because their names were Maheen Ghani Taseer and Shahbaz Ali Taseer," Joel Siegal, their lawyer, was as quoted as saying by the Daily Mail.

"They were singled out and treated as the most vile terrorists," he said.

The Daily Mail reported that Shahbaz is the son of Salman Taseer, the governor of Punjab province who was assassinated by an Islamic extremist in January.

The incident occurred on August 19 last year, and the case was transferred from the San Francisco Superior Court to the federal court this week.

The couple were vacationing in the US and were heading to New York to catch a flight back to Pakistan. They are currently in Pakistan.

In a statement, American Airlines said that it would move to dismiss the claims.

Pak couple sues American airline for racial profiling - The Times of India
 
why go USA for vacations when we all know how paranoid they are about us....
 
this is how the evil nation's going from the single superpower, down to a unwelcomed fascist nation.

should stop working with them on WOT.
 
I was more outrage when they searched a white little girl. Thats racial profiling right there.

Don't divert from topic, your agencies are more likely to capture or kill innocents while they let the real villains escape with ease.

After all your country let the entire Bin Laden family and Sauds out after 911 while you captured innocents who had no malice towards America.

I hope that this couple gets an apology from the authorities involved.
 
Hope they win this case. They should fight like Dr. Haneef who was also wrongly accused.
 
Don't divert from topic, your agencies are more likely to capture or kill innocents while they let the real villains escape with ease.

After all your country let the entire Bin Laden family and Sauds out after 911 while you captured innocents who had no malice towards America.

I hope that this couple gets an apology from the authorities involved.

Wait what happened to the Osama Bin Laden and his family? I was shocked when his family didn't die.
 
The Daily Mail reported that Shahbaz is the son of Salman Taseer, the governor of Punjab province who was assassinated by an Islamic extremist in January.

They had to add the bold part, eh?
 
Don't divert from topic, your agencies are more likely to capture or kill innocents while they let the real villains escape with ease.

After all your country let the entire Bin Laden family and Sauds out after 911 while you captured innocents who had no malice towards America.

I hope that this couple gets an apology from the authorities involved.

The question is about Racial Profiling, whereas, what you are talking about is the case of mistaken identity or deliberate measures to save guilty and victimize innocents - That is an entirely different subject and is unrelated to racial profiling. Even your second sentence proves the point - inconveniencing those who hold no malice against the US (including the white Americans/Canadians/Europeans).

I think Oldman1 has rightly pointed out a generic case of white kids/toddlers getting searched or denied the flight. I travel to the US frequently, and contrary to the widely held perception, I have seen whites getting searched most often and most extensively.

If it helps - even Ted Kennedy was stopped from boarding a flight, simply because a similar name came up in the banned list.
 
They had to add the bold part, eh?

"Islamic extremist"

What else are they supposed to say when Mumtaz Qadri proclaims to have done it for the sake of Islam?

If he had done it for any reason unrelated to the religion, they wouldn't have used that term.
 
The question is about Racial Profiling, whereas, what you are talking about is the case of mistaken identity or deliberate measures to save guilty and victimize innocents - That is an entirely different subject and is unrelated to racial profiling. Even your second sentence proves the point - inconveniencing those who hold no malice against the US (including the white Americans/Canadians/Europeans).

I think Oldman1 has rightly pointed out a generic case of white kids/toddlers getting searched or denied the flight. I travel to the US frequently, and contrary to the widely held perception, I have seen whites getting searched most often and most extensively.

If it helps - even Ted Kennedy was stopped from boarding a flight, simply because a similar name came up in the banned list.

Local kids being searched....for what?
 
Wait what happened to the Osama Bin Laden and his family? I was shocked when his family didn't die.

Are you even aware of the following:

September 14-19, 2001: Bin Laden Family Members, Saudi Royals Quietly Leave US

Khalil bin Laden at the Orlando, Florida, airport, about to be flown out of the country in the days after 9/11. [Source: Lions Gate Films]

Following a secret flight inside the US that is in violation of a national private airplane flight ban, members of the bin Laden family and Saudi royalty quietly depart the US. The flights are only publicly acknowledged after all the Saudis have left. [BOSTON GLOBE, 9/21/2001; NEW YORK TIMES, 9/30/2001] About 140 Saudis, including around 24 members of the bin Laden family, are passengers in these flights. The identities of most of these passengers are not known. However, some of the passengers include:

The son of the Saudi Defense Minister Prince Sultan. Sultan is sued in August 2002 for alleged complicity in the 9/11 plot. [TAMPA TRIBUNE, 10/5/2001] He is alleged to have contributed at least $6 million since 1994 to four charities that finance al-Qaeda. [VANITY FAIR, 10/2003]

Khalil bin Laden. He has been investigated by the Brazilian government for possible terrorist connections. [VANITY FAIR, 10/2003]

Abdullah bin Laden and Omar bin Laden, cousins of bin Laden. Abdullah was the US director of the Muslim charity World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY). The governments of India, Pakistan, Philippines, and Bosnia have all accused WAMY of funding terrorism. These two relatives were investigated by the FBI in 1996 (see February-September 11, 1996) in a case involving espionage, murder, and national security. Their case is reopened on September 19, right after they leave the country. [VANITY FAIR, 10/2003] Remarkably, four of the 9/11 hijackers briefly lived in the town of Falls Church, Virginia, three blocks from the WAMY office headed by Abdullah bin Laden. [BBC, 11/6/2001]

Saleh Ibn Abdul Rahman Hussayen. He is a prominent Saudi official who was in the same hotel as three of the hijackers the night before 9/11. He leaves on one of the first flights to Saudi Arabia before the FBI can properly interview him about this. [WASHINGTON POST, 10/2/2003]

Akberali Moawalla. A Pakistani and business partner of Osama’s brother Yeslam bin Laden. In 2000, a transfer of over $250 million was made from a bank account belonging jointly to Moawalla and Osama bin Laden (see 2000). [WASHINGTON POST, 7/22/2004]


There is a later dispute regarding how thoroughly the Saudis are interviewed before they leave and who approves the flights. Counterterrorism “tsar” Richard Clarke says he agrees to the flights after the FBI assures him none of those on board has connections to terrorism and that it is “a conscious decision with complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the FBI and the White House.” [US CONGRESS, 9/3/2003] Clarke says the decision to approve the flights “didn’t get any higher than me.” [HILL, 5/18/2004] According to Vanity Fair, both the FBI and the State Department “deny playing any role whatsoever in the episode.” However, Dale Watson, the head of the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division, says the Saudis on the planes “[are] identified, but they [are] not subject to serious interviews or interrogations” before they leave. [VANITY FAIR, 10/2003] An FBI spokesperson says the bin Laden relatives are only interviewed by the FBI “at the airport, as they [are] about to leave.” [NATIONAL REVIEW, 9/11/2002]

There are claims that some passengers are not interviewed by the FBI at all. [VANITY FAIR, 10/2003] Abdullah bin Laden, who stays in the US, says that even a month after 9/11, his only contact with the FBI is a brief phone call. [BOSTON GLOBE, 9/21/2001; NEW YORKER, 11/5/2001] The FBI official responsible for coordinating with Clarke is Assistant Director Michael Rolince, who is in charge of the Bureau’s International Terrorism Operations Section and assumes responsibility for the Saudi flights. Rolince decides that the Saudis can leave after their faces are matched to their passport photos and their names are run through various databases, including some watch lists, to check the FBI has no derogatory information about them.” [9/11 COMMISSION, 8/21/2004, PP. 196-197, 209 ] Numerous experts are surprised that the bin Ladens are not interviewed more extensively before leaving, pointing out that interviewing the relatives of suspects is standard investigative procedure. [NATIONAL REVIEW, 9/11/2002; VANITY FAIR, 10/2003] MSNBC claims that “members of the Saudi royal family met frequently with bin Laden—both before and after 9/11” [MSNBC, 9/5/2003] , and many Saudi royals and bin Laden relatives are being sued for their alleged role in 9/11. The Boston Globe opines that the flights occur “too soon after 9/11 for the FBI even to know what questions to ask, much less to decide conclusively that each Saudi [royal] and bin Laden relative [deserve] an ‘all clear,’ never to be available for questions again.” [BOSTON GLOBE, 9/30/2003] Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) says of the secret flights: “This is just another example of our country coddling the Saudis and giving them special privileges that others would never get. It’s almost as if we didn’t want to find out what links existed.” [NEW YORK TIMES, 9/4/2003] Judicial Watch will disclose FBI documents that say, “Osama bin Laden may have chartered one of the Saudi flights.” [JUDICIAL WATCH, 6/20/2007]

Couldn't stop them somehow, I wonder why?
 
Local kids being searched....for what?

For... they could be terrorists! And I am talking about toddlers, who were not even born when the act of terrorism/arson was committed by someone who bore the same name.

A friend of mine, white, 65, and a well known artist, was held at the Canadian border for 5 hours till they turned everything inside out of what used to be his luggage. Mine remained untouched - I am a brown guy.
 
I hope they win this suit, this was way too blatant a disregard and a continuing sign of American incompetence in dealing with security issues.
 
The question is about Racial Profiling, whereas, what you are talking about is the case of mistaken identity or deliberate measures to save guilty and victimize innocents - That is an entirely different subject and is unrelated to racial profiling. Even your second sentence proves the point - inconveniencing those who hold no malice against the US (including the white Americans/Canadians/Europeans).

Mistaken identity based on racial profiling, that is what this is.

What you have so intently overlooked is the fact that I am not limiting it to one race and neither have I stated so. What the Americans have actually done is that they have created the environment for terrorists to flourish and then they used this very thing to victimize people.

After all there wouldn't be global terrorism if it weren't for "Operation Cyclone".

I think Oldman1 has rightly pointed out a generic case of white kids/toddlers getting searched or denied the flight. I travel to the US frequently, and contrary to the widely held perception, I have seen whites getting searched most often and most extensively.

Why does this happen?

They want to make sure that they remain safe but the problem is that these measures are inadequate and they further aggravate the matter.

In this scenario, the reaction of the authorities was probably based on the background of the victims.

If it helps - even Ted Kennedy was stopped from boarding a flight, simply because a similar name came up in the banned list.

So, that had nothing to do with terrorism or its after effects.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom