What's new

Pakistan was created on the basis of group nationalism and not religion

EjazR:

I've made some additions in my Post # 375, please address them all. You might miss some of the extra details I just added.
 
Qaid-e-Azam himself led a secular life. He never offered namaz, drank wine,ate pork, found specially tailored suits more comfortable than Salwar kameez.

Even his contemporary MK Gandhi must have known more ayats of Quran than Qaid-e-Azam.

Pity I would like to see a progressive and modern Pakistan which is secular and gives equal rights to the minorities.

Religion is a personal matter, I don't understand why Islam and Politics are intermixed with each other?
 
You need to read a lot about history son , punjab is part of india as well .

Indus valley civilisation also encompasses gujarat , indian punjab , rajasthan , jammu , haryana and recently a site has also been excavated in western uttar pradesh . Google alamgirpur it is in western uttar pradesh .

That entire post fails due to your faulty knowledge of history. Use the internet man . what is it for ?

I guess you just dont want to learn .

And btw the word india was used first by the greeks not by the brits.

1st) You dont have any proper answer to give him.

"Use the internet man". << This is your reply to him.

East Punjab became apart of india in 1947 when india was created by the British.

The only people in india who can claim IVC are North West and western indians. The majority of indians have no right over IVC. Whereas majority of Pakistanis have every right over IVC.

You indians are desperate to claim Indus Valley Civilization, you got to any extent.
 
1st) You dont have any proper answer to give him.

"Use the internet man". << This is your reply to him.

East Punjab became apart of india in 1947 when india was created by the British.

The only people in india who can claim IVC are North West and western indians. The majority of indians have no right over IVC. Whereas majority of Pakistanis have every right over IVC.

You indians are desperate to claim Indus Valley Civilization, you got to any extent.

So if you claim that IVC is yours, that means you are ready to claim that your forefathers who lived in IVC were HINDUS, and HARDCORE Idol worshippers, and you changed your faith out of fear of the muslim invaders.

And yeah if IVC was yours, surely you would consider Mohammed Bin Qasim as an Invader!!!
 
1st) You dont have any proper answer to give him.

"Use the internet man". << This is your reply to him.

East Punjab became apart of india in 1947 when india was created by the British.

The only people in india who can claim IVC are North West and western indians. The majority of indians have no right over IVC. Whereas majority of Pakistanis have every right over IVC.

You indians are desperate to claim Indus Valley Civilization, you got to any extent.

Yes and that is exactly the answer that he needed , that all pakistanis need .

Learn history from neutral sources . trust me there is no better advise anybody can give you pakistanis now.

All people of indian subcontinent ( india , pak and bangladesh) are descendents of the indus civilisation .

And btw search for alamgirpur , the indus valley site is in U.P and U.P is not westenr or north western India .

Now buzz off
 
So if you claim that IVC is yours, that means you are ready to claim that your forefathers who lived in IVC were HINDUS, and HARDCORE Idol worshippers, and you changed your faith out of fear of the muslim invaders.

And yeah if IVC was yours, surely you would consider Mohammed Bin Qasim as an Invader!!!

There is no solid proof the people of IVC were hindus. This is the desperate attempt of you hindus to try and claim IVC as your own.

Even if my ancestors were hindu, they were still my ancestors and they had nothing to do with you. Stop worrying about my ancestors.
 
Yes and that is exactly the answer that he needed , that all pakistanis need .

Learn history from neutral sources . trust me there is no better advise anybody can give you pakistanis now.

All people of indian subcontinent ( india , pak and bangladesh) are descendents of the indus civilisation .

And btw search for alamgirpur , the indus valley site is in U.P and U.P is not westenr or north western India .

Now buzz off

The IVC doesnt belong to the whole of south Asia. That's like saying the Ancient Egypt belongs to the whole of North Afrcia. Or the Persian Empire belongs to the whole of Middle East. Or Greek Civilization belongs to the whole of Europe.
 
Anyone, correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't the Indus Valley Civilization derived specifically from the Indus RIVER? Both Moenjedaro & Harrapa in Pakistan are right next to the Indus River, & which is why all of Pakistan & only certain Western parts of India are part of the IVC today? The Indus river literally almost flows through the middle of Pakistan, which is why there would be sites on both sides of it, covering all the land area of Pakistan & maybe some Western parts of India. How the hell is Bangladesh or most of India related to the Indus River?
 
There is no solid proof the people of IVC were hindus. This is the desperate attempt of you hindus to try and claim IVC as your own.

Even if my ancestors were hindu, they were still my ancestors and they had nothing to do with you. Stop worrying about my ancestors.


No Solid Proof!!!!

Jeezzzz, Check out neutral sources you will find the shiva Idol, The Bull, The stone inscribed words of Shiva and Shambhu..etc; etc; etc;

Good lord, m sitting in my office and doing some important work, otherwise would have given you so many references..

I was talking in general not point towards your ancestors in particular.

I like it that you respect your ancestors, if you really do, respect there religion as well.

Remeber Allah says in glorious Quran- Only He is the judge who can decide whether You are a muslim or not.
 
TheStrantrunCurve

Main drawback of Pakistani people is what you posted. Nations look for next but we are still standing in 1947. This kind of writers are main cause of confusions.

Just go to Jinnah speeches to know on what bases Pakistan is created, it will more better than read self advertisement aimed writers.

Is this called BS free journalism? Cutting roots of country in they are living?


If someone misunderstood the religion of Islam, that does not mean that we should make Pakistan a secular state.

As far as your statement about Jinnah's speech is concerned; well then here is one of the speech:

"What was the motive for the demand for Pakistan and a separate electorate for Muslims? What was the need of the division of India? Its cause is neither the narrow mindedness of Hindus not the tactics of Britishers, but is the basic demand of ISLAM

He wanted an Islamic state and InshAlllah Pakistan will become an Islamic State. .
 
Majority of Pakistani Punjabis are native to Indus region. Minority are mixed with invaders.

Gakkhars and Khokhars have middle eastern ancestry...

Too much..to bear...!!!!!!!

hadd ho gayi yaar!!!
 
No Solid Proof!!!!

Jeezzzz, Check out neutral sources you will find the shiva Idol, The Bull, The stone inscribed words of Shiva and Shambhu..etc; etc; etc;

Good lord, m sitting in my office and doing some important work, otherwise would have given you so many references..

I was talking in general not point towards your ancestors in particular.

I like it that you respect your ancestors, if you really do, respect there religion as well.

Remeber Allah says in glorious Quran- Only He is the judge who can decide whether You are a muslim or not.

The people of IVC were known to bury their dead, and also slaughter cows. Face it. They were not hindus.

And even if they were hindus, you still cant claim IVC as your own. It's like saying I can claim Iranian, Arab, Egyptian, ect. history because I'm Muslim.
 
It is getting confusing.

Some say it is the two nation theory and some bring in other historical and religious genesis.

You say it is an Islamic state governed by Sharia and Mr Jinnah stated that Pakistan was to be a secular state!

if objectively viewed, all elements gathered under the flag of AIML after 1946. so all try to colour the state in their own way, same is the case in india, some call it a secular state, some call it a hindu state, other want it to be communist, yet others want it socialist, what Dalits want maybe something more.
No point in discussing.
 

Back
Top Bottom