What's new

Shaheen-3 Missiles 90 Seconds To Delhi

First of all, your missiles are based on old Soviet era and Chinese/north korean technology like scud, m9, M11, No dong etc which are known for their unreliability. Secondly whom you are trying hard to impress posses slbm that can hit you from under the sea platform from as far as 4000 km away. Apart from that we have abm systems and your entire country is under the watch of our military satellites 24/7. You may or may not be able to hit us with your missiles but we definitely will hit you.
OH TROLL WE IMPROVE THAT TECH BY OURSELVES GAIN FROM THOSE COUNTRIES AND WE HAVE SOME KIND ANTI ABM TECH IN OUR SOME BMS ESPECIALLY ON SHAHEEN 1A

AND YOUR BMs ARE BASED ON OLD RUSSIAN BMs TECH so
 
Muktis help? Lol. They were just our auxiliaries. It was actually us who sent half of your navy down to the ocean floor, a third of your army surrender and destroyed a major chunk of your air force. Don't try so hard to hide your shame.
Then what stopped you from doing the same in western sector? Not too much traitors to weaken our defenses?
Truth is we bombed you and shot down two of your planes when india was just months away from officially becoming super pooper. And the virat hindu modi couldn't even launch retaliatory strikes.
Ever wonder why after thrashing of 27th he wanted to missiles and not use conventional forces?
 
Troll give me one ANSWER for my question WHY YOU INTERFERE OUR INTERNAL MATTERS IN 71

AND OUR AIR FORCE AND NAVAL ASSETS WERE MINIMAL AND DISPERSED, ONLY PA WAS A STRONG THAT'S WHY YOU'RE SUCCEEDED IN EAST PAKISTAN SECTOR BUT THANKS TO MUKHTI BAHANI YOU GAVE THEM THEN LATEST WEAPONS AND COMMUNICATION STUFFS BUT WEST PAKISTAN SECTOR WE DEFENDED WELL OURSELVES EVEN IN SOME CASES BETTER THAN 65

Well you attacked us 2 times before; unsuccessfully. Repercussions had to be there. Secondly you were defeated on our western front too where you claim that majority of your assets were stationed. And we did not give muktis latest weapons but basic infantry firearms for sabotage and intel gathering operations.
 
I know some very intelligent leftists who just want good of this country with a different ideology.

Their is no such thing as an intelligent leftist. Intelligent people actually understand economics.
 
Well you attacked us 2 times before; unsuccessfully. Repercussions had to be there. Secondly you were defeated on our western front too where you claim that majority of your assets were stationed. And we did not give muktis latest weapons but basic infantry firearms for sabotage and intel gathering operations.
When we attack you 2 times are you talking about 48 and 65 then you're all wrong its was in the internationally disputed area not in mainland India but you attack us in 65
 
Then what stopped you from doing the same in western sector? Not too much traitors to weaken our defenses?
Truth is we bombed you and shot down two of your planes when india was just months away from officially becoming super pooper. And the virat hindu modi couldn't even launch retaliatory strikes.
Ever wonder why after thrashing of 27th he wanted to missiles and not use conventional forces?
Oh you pakistani have habit of ranting Feb 27 to soothe your tiny ego when you shot down an old mig with 24 to 1 numerical superiority and yet lost one of your aircraft. That second pilot has still been not identified yet is he?

And as for your first question, west pakistan was not our objective.
When we attack you 2 times are you talking about 48 and 65 then you're all wrong its was in the internationally disputed area not in mainland India but you attack us in 65
You are a pathological liar, we never attacked any country first and there is no internationally dispute that's just your narrative. Even the 71 war started by you.
 
Oh you pakistani have habit of ranting Feb 27 to soothe your tiny ego
Well not everyone is braindead like bakht to run back to 70s when we were fighting a civil war. 27 '19 is the most recent conflict. It's logical to use it as base to judge capabilities of virat hindus.


you shot down an old mig with 24 to 1 numerical superiority
Not our fault if your drunk generals were incompetent enough to send a mig to fend off falcons, is it? Besides there were Sukhois and mirages too but they chickened out after losing a Sukhoi.

That second pilot has still been not identified yet is he
Clutching at straws, are we?
World runs on empirical claims not bollywood filmsy claims.
 
Muktis help? Lol. They were just our auxiliaries. It was actually us who sent half of your navy down to the ocean floor, a third of your army surrender and destroyed a major chunk of your air force. Don't try so hard to hide your shame.
Such BS goes down well in Slumdog Street but then again you creatures prefer to live in a parallel universe.
Your pathetic Agni Pankh Patils couldn't even destroy even one of the grounded 11 F-86 Sabres what to say of them getting toasted in the air, we lost a few patrol boats but sinking of Kukri is considered as best kill since the second world war....just as well captain of the Kirpan ran away as if IN wife swapping party was in progress.
As for Muktis being just an auxiliary , just remember it's just a few hundred freedom fighters in IOK that are causing your Haldi Daal warriors to blow their brains out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Which target did shaheen 3 hit in its last test? Any Idea?
Landed in Arabian sea at designated place.
All three parts fallen at the pre-defined territories.
Obvious show of strength, to destroy enemies security doctrines including Iron dome.
 
These looks to be genuine and verified accounts. How can one deny them?
Verified means that the account is run by the people it claims to be run by, not that what they say is correct.

Also can mods clean up this thread? It is a shitshow.
 
Geographically speaking, Delhi and Bombay are more or less same distance from Pakistani border. Giving 4 mins to Bombay to survive is very generous , as it will be more likely hit from missile launch somewhere from southern Pakistan.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom