What's new

IRIAF | News and Discussions

come on look at the different of power between J-85-21b compared to F110-GE-129 or F110-GE-132
i didn't said that the wing will turn f-5 to f-16xl but it surely will change it to f-5xl and will bring all the benefits that it brought to f-16.
 
Without a pilot or wreckage of jet, India has nothing.

Again show me physical evidence.

Just like every time Syria claims to have shot down an Israeli fighter. Out of all the times only once was there evidence to back it up.

During conflict both sides come with propaganda and exaggeration of claims to inflate the capability of their armed forces.
You tell me where is the second hospitalized pilot, and I will show you the wreckage!
 
interesting solution, I would use the elongated fuselage of the kowsar but with only one pilot seat

zSBOcuk.png
Similar to Saab 37 Viggen ...though without canard ..
 
In the fog of war, often times evidence cannot be attained for various reasons, however that doesn't mean that everything is black & white.

Without a pilot or wreckage of jet, India has nothing.

Again show me physical evidence.

Just like every time Syria claims to have shot down an Israeli fighter. Out of all the times only once was there evidence to back it up.

During conflict both sides come with propaganda and exaggeration of claims to inflate the capability of their armed forces.
 
In the fog of war, often times evidence cannot be attained for various reasons, however that doesn't mean that everything is black & white.

Fog of war? It’s been a week since the incident.

A plane doesn’t crash and conveniently no one with a phone get a picture of it
 
Two-seater Kowsar (true photo)
and playing with images with photoshop
single-seater kowsar with elongated fuselage of the two-seater
single-seater kowsar with elongated fuselage and wing type F-16XL - however maintaining engine air intakes, as the Mithridates user had designed

eYNhopZ.jpg
You are really good at this!
 
TheImmortal

It is you who do not understand Iran's scientific process and their announcement process. You are a few years late on the news. The F-4 SM is an active platform transition to the new aircraft and the new cell. This will eventually be admitted but Iran is still slow to demonstrate their technological lead.

Yet there are indications for years that Iran is still ahead of the announcement process.
 
TheImmortal

It is you who do not understand Iran's scientific process and their announcement process. You are a few years late on the news. The F-4 SM is an active platform transition to the new aircraft and the new cell. This will eventually be admitted but Iran is still slow to demonstrate their technological lead.

Yet there are indications for years that Iran is still ahead of the announcement process.

Iran is slow to admit it upgraded its 1970s F-4 fighters?

Yet it proudly shows off its upgrade F-14 AM?

Yet it shows off a crude F-313 before it is even ready?

Your logic is beyond absurd.

It’s like @yavar made another account called @Mr Iran Eye
 
And that evidence was provided by Israel
Yeah,but that was probably just because they realised that they couldnt use that old trope of a "crash" due to "unknown causes" or a "mechanical malfunction" to explain the loss of the aircraft.
 

National interest is the equivalent of sitting at an arm chair general convention. It’s a terrible source of information and the people that write there usually have very little knowledge on how war works or equipment in general.

F-22 production line is long gone and equipment destroyed.

People forget that F-22 is an OLD plane, its prototypes were developed in 90s and it’s production models tested in early 00’s. Technology and processing power has come a long way since then.

B-21 is susceptible to any country that has formidable air defenses. Fighting rag tag militias is one thing, going up against Hypersonic air defense missiles is another thing.

Stupid article. Israel going into any major war will draw the US anyway, so it doesn’t need these things.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom