What's new

Are the rumors of Tibet's substantial change of demography true?

Are the rumors of Tibet's substantial change of demography true?

  • Yes, Tibet's demography has changed considerably since 1950.

    Votes: 9 50.0%
  • No, there are only few non-Tibetan civilians residing there. Hence the demography is roughly the sam

    Votes: 4 22.2%
  • On the contrary, there's a law which strictly prohibits outsiders from taking property or job there.

    Votes: 5 27.8%

  • Total voters
    18
Let india amuse us,laughing is good to health...


To challenge China’s sovereignty over Tibet is to hope to become the core enemy of 1.4 billion people.
Tibet does not belong to China..Soon it will be recognized as an independent nation like it or not..
 
How soon? my false flagger :lol:
Tibet does not belong to China..Soon it will be recognized as an independent nation like it or not..
Your a Indian work in Bangladesh. Only Hindu day dream of annex Tibet and got slaughter by China in 1962 and wish Tibet never part of China.

Tibet does not belong to China..Soon it will be recognized as an independent nation like it or not..
Comeback when you awoke from your day dream, China isn’t India can redraw the line of China borders on the whim of the British.
 
Given the sheer number of Tibetan refugees who flock to India - it is obvious there is a change in the demography.
 
Don't just chant slogans like what your inconpetent politicians can do the best for the development of your country, what is your Indians' point to srart this so called poll? What are going to do about Tibet?
What can anybody do here? What have you done besides yap? It’s a forum on the internet genius. Stf up
 
This data isn't hard to find but does require some digging. PDF of the study is included.

The Tibetan population in the TAR was at 100% in 1953, dropping down to but stabilizing at 94.4-96.4% from the years 1982-2005. We do see a substantial increase in Han migration, with the growth rate of the Han population at ~10% in 2002, ~23% in 2003, and ~12% in 2005. Interestingly, there was a massive drop in the Han population in 2004 (a -11.46% change). Another factor that might've contributed to this, other than migration, would be much higher birth/death rate ratio of the Han population (7.23 vs 3.84 of the Tibetan population). This data is from 1992 so it might not reflect the situation today.

Nevertheless, the Tibetan population has seen much larger increases than the Han population. Tibetan population increased by 1386313 from 1982-2000 while the Han population increased by a measly 19041 within the same timeframe.

So, in a nutshell, there has been an increase in the Han population, but the difference is not sufficiently significant to change the complete demographic makeup of the Tibet Autonomous Regions and the change fairly stable for quite some time.
 

Attachments

  • TAR-Census2.pdf
    363.9 KB · Views: 13
Back
Top Bottom