What's new

PN vs IN fast boat Chase

NO, aggression does mean you will hit a ship from behind, and can say, it was aggression during the peaceful mission.
It was not hit from behind. TheIndians started the aggressive maneuvers and PN gave it back in kind. Indians thought they out run the ancient Type 21 frigate but they were so wrong. PN should have sent a boarding party and hijacked the ship.
 
Last edited:
Seems the Indian personnel were taunting the Pak personnel to come closer, confidence is clearly very high
Overconfidence. If the guy with the launcher pulled the trigger he, the launcher, or both would be in the water, and if he missed there would be no chance to fire again. PN personnel were in proper ready to fire positions.
 
It was not hit from behind. TheIndians started the aggressive maneuvers and PN gave it back in kind. Indians thought they out run the ancient Type 21 frigate but they were so wrong. PN should have sent a boarding party and hijacked the ship.
This was fun, there's lots of these types of incidents across the world and is standard practice.. a bit of showboating, some sabre rattling.. happens both on sea and in the skies. Many are either never made public, or not leaked.

Good stuff :smokin:
 
Why was he holding and aiming Carl Gustaf? That shit would have end up in water. He was Standing on a moving boat looking at another fast moving target. Pakistanis were at least kneeling, just in case they have to aim.
Shows the quality of their leadership to put a single shot hand held weapon and an extremely unstable bobbing and small platform to shot a fast moving bobbing target. Pakistani DShka would made make mince meat out out them.
 
It was not hit from behind. TheIndians started the aggressive maneuvers and PN gave it back in kind. Indians thought they out run the ancient Type 21 frigate but they were so wrong. PN should have sent a boarding party and hijacked the ship.

Hahahahaha... Why not.. They should have tried it
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom