What's new

Zardari "would have no choice but to respond militarily to an Indian attack"

In any event of war, India would loose more than Pakistan would, so naturally India would be more interested in peace than Pakistan ever would. Everybody knows that LeT and JuD are the perpetrators of Mumbai. In spite of that they are free (Please don’t give the excuse of insufficient evidence). India wants peace, but not at the cost of our honor.

If Pakistan would have wanted peace and return of dialogue, it would have certainly taken action against LeT and JuD. For instance, if LeT would have committed similar crime against US, everyone knows what would have been the Pakistan’s action. As regarding Pak Army, it is beyond me why it would want peace
Has kasab, who was caught on video tape and with eyewitnesses, killing innocent people, been punished by India yet?

When it is taking so long for India, in what should be an open and shut case, to prosecute Kasab, then why question the length of time the trial in Pakistan is taking - especially since that trial involves indirect evidence linking the planners to the attack, and is therefore much more complex to prosecute. Add in the fact that the Pakistani legal system is slow to begin with, and there is nothing 'surreptitious' about the trial of the seven accused plotters.

Lack of evidence BTW, is a crucial argument, and as far as Hafiz Saeed is concerned, it remains a valid argument since no evidence linking him to the Mumbai attacks has been provided, that I am aware of at least.
 
.
if you think like that than there will be no peace because it is natural that india is dominating the region and in future it will expand it further. Our economy is much bigger than the countries of south asia and it is growing rapidly and faster than others. our military, diplomatic and cultural influence is enormous. we have good relation with all countries of saarc and beyond except pakistan. think about it.

How do you define 'dominance' outside of having a larger economy? How will this dominance be manifested in the region, and specifically WRT the India-Pakistan dynamic?
 
. . . .
Pak army no match for India's so we want more nukes'

WASHINGTON: Despite "pending economic catastrophe," Pakistan is producing nuclear weapons at a "faster rate" than any other country in the world, according to a stunning American appraisal that forms part of the cables relating to US-Pakistan relations leaked by the whistleblower organization wikileaks.

The assessment was conveyed by US National Intelligence Officer for South Asia Dr Peter Lavoy to NATO representatives in November 2008 amid widespread, and continuing, apprehensions among major powers, recorded in separate cables, about the security of the weapons and its possible heist by terrorists, extremists and fundamentalists, including those in the government.

Among those expressing concern about the safety of Pakistani nukes are British and Russian officials, even as American and Chinese interlocutors mull over how to address Pakistan's fear of India that is ostensibly leading it to crank out nuclear weapons rapidly even it stalls a treaty to end production of fissile material (FMCT).

In one particularly startling cable, a high ranking Chinese official, vice foreign minister He Yafei, is quoted as hearing from a Pakistan general that Pakistan needs nuclear weapons because of its inferior army. "Indeed, a Pakistani military leader said his army was no match for the Indian army," the cable records Yafei as saying.

But the most elaborate scenario of a nuclear heist in Pakistan comes in a heavily redacted cable which cites an unnamed Russian official questioning the security measures Islamabad claims to have established, and which is frequently accepted as secure by Washington, and suggesting that the Pakistan's growing Islamization constitutes an imminent nuclear danger.

"Russia is aware that Pakistani authorities, with help from the US, have created a well-structured system of security for protecting nuclear facilities, which includes physical protection. However, there are 120,000-130,000 people directly involved in Pakistan's nuclear and missile programs... there is no way to guarantee that all are 100% loyal and reliable," the cable. conveying the Russian view, reads

"In addition to the Islamist interest in these facilities," the cable continues, "Russia also is aware that Pakistan has had to hire people to protect nuclear facilities that have especially strict religious beliefs, and recently the general educational and cultural levels in Pakistan has been falling. Due to these facts, extremist organizations have more opportunities to recruit people working in the nuclear and missile programs... Russia thinks Pakistan should also be a particular focus of discussion."

Showing little trust in their much-touted ally, US officials offer a slightly different take in another cable, saying, "Our major concern is not having an Islamic militant steal an entire weapon but rather the chance someone working in Government of Pakistan facilities could gradually smuggle enough material out to eventually make a weapon.

A lengthy cable discussing Pakistan's opposition to the fissile material cut off treaty also notes the trauma inflicted on Islamabad by the US-India nuclear deal, which Pakistan believes has "unshackled" India's nuclear weapons program by freeing up domestic uranium to make more bombs, hence necessitating Pakistan stalling FMCT as it ramps up its arsenal.

"Islamabad has chafed over the US-India 123 Agreement, arguing it also needs civilian nuclear power to meet energy demand; we have repeatedly advised the GOP that it should not expect a similar agreement because of AQ Khan's proliferation activities," notes another cable


Read more: 'Pak army no match for India's so we want more nukes' - The Times of India 'Pak army no match for India's so we want more nukes' - The Times of India
 
.
am waiting for that andheri raat maybe next century belongs to you !!!!till then let us enjoy and you can join us too.....:cheesy::cheers:



let who enjoy? the 2% of indians making above 2 dollars a day?
 
.
It should be known to all that India would never instigate an attack on Pakistan. It has far more to lose than Pakistan.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom