What's new

World poverty shrinking: Nepal, Bangladesh stand out

CaPtAiN_pLaNeT

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
7,685
Reaction score
0
World poverty shrinking: Nepal, Bangladesh stand out


World poverty shrinking: Nepal, Bangladesh stand out - Hindustan Times

London, March 17, 2013
First Published: 23:44 IST(17/3/2013)
Last Updated: 23:46 IST(17/3/2013)
t
Some of the poorest people in the world are becoming significantly less poor, says a groundbreaking academic study which has taken a new approach to measuring deprivation.

The report, by Oxford University’s poverty and human development initiative, predicts that countries among the most impoverished could see acute poverty eradicated within 20 years if they continue at present rates.

It identifies “star performer” nations such as Rwanda, Nepal and Bangladesh as places where deprivation could disappear within the lifetime of present generations.

Close on their heels with reductions in poverty levels were Ghana, Tanzania, Cambodia and Bolivia.

The study stated that poverty reduction drives in the developing world were exceeding all expectations

===============================================================================


Bangladesh, Nepal reducing poverty faster than India, says Oxford study

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/repor...y-faster-than-india-says-oxford-study_1812550

Indo-Asian News Service | Updated: March 18, 2013 12:56 IST

Nepal reducing poverty faster than India, says Oxford study

File photo
London: Nepal and Bangladesh are reducing poverty faster compared to India, according to a new study based on the multidimensional poverty index developed at the University of Oxford and used by the UN Development Programme (UNDP) in its Human Development Reports.

India also made significant progress in reducing poverty between 1999 and 2006, but at a rate that was less than one-third of the speed of its neighbours, with a reduction in poverty rates of 1.2 percentage points per year [instead of 4.1% (Nepal) or 3.2% (Bangladesh)], the study found.

However, multidimensional poverty was reduced least in certain states - such as Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal - and among social groups like the Scheduled Tribes, Muslims, female-headed households and larger households.

Also See

Video: Poverty through the prism of stats: 60% rural folk live on less than Rs 35 per day
3:02
Poverty through the prism of stats: 60% rural folk live on less than Rs. 35 per day

According to the study, even India's best-performing states - Kerala and Andhra Pradesh - progressed little more than half as fast as Nepal or Bangladesh in reducing multidimensional poverty, a release from the Oxford Poverty and Human development Initiative (OPHI), which conducted the study, said.

"The success of Nepal and Bangladesh in reducing poverty despite their relatively low income highlights the effectiveness of social policy investments combined with active civil society engagement," said Dr Sabina Alkire, director of OPHI.

The poverty measure used by OPHI, the global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), is said to be unique in capturing the simultaneous disadvantages experienced by poor people, such as malnutrition, education and sanitation, providing a high-resolution lens on their lives.

According to researcher Suman Seth, "From 1999-2006 India did very well in certain aspects of poverty reduction; for example, MPI among the scheduled caste groups showed a strong reduction, and poverty among the most destitute went down faster than the average."

She added: "However, it's still the case that the benefits of national poverty reduction have been enjoyed least by some of the poorer groups and regions."

OPHI added that India had not collected official data on MPI deprivations including malnutrition since 2005/6, making India's MPI the least up-to-date in South Asia.

The global MPI, which was developed by OPHI and UNDP in 2010 and has been published in Human Development reports since, assesses multidimensional poverty in 104 countries for which data since 2002 are available.

The study found that were 'star performers': the percentage of poor people in Nepal dropped from 64.7% to 44.2% between 2006 and 2011, 4.1 percentage points per year, while in Bangladesh poverty rates decreased by 3.2 percentage points per year between 2004 and 2007.

In addition to reducing the percentage of poor people, both Nepal and Bangladesh reduced the intensity of poverty. This means that even poor people were on average less poor - deprived in fewer things at the same time - than they had been before, an important element of multidimensional poverty analysis that provides a more balanced picture of poor people's lives, the release added.

The MPI is based on a deprivation score which reflects each person's overlapping deprivations in nutrition, child mortality, years of schooling, child school attendance, water, sanitation, electricity, cooking fuel, flooring, and assets.

A person is identified as 'multidimensionally poor' if he or she is deprived in one-third or more of ten (weighted) indicators.
 
@CaPtAiN_pLaNeT
thanks for this wonderful post , it is our time to shine :yahoo:

The end of the Third World? New study shows world poverty could be eradicated in 20 years

Poverty levels in Nepal, Rwanda and Bangladesh have dropped
Report predicts some of the poorest countries in the world could see acute poverty eradicated within 20 years


By Daily Mail Reporter

PUBLISHED: 17:47 GMT, 17 March 2013 | UPDATED: 08:26 GMT, 18 March 2013


World poverty is shrinking and developing countries are becoming less poor according to a new study by Oxford University.

Nepal, Rwanda and Bangladesh were the 'star performers' of the 22-country study carried out by the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI), followed by Ghana, Tanzania, Cambodia and Bolivia.

The report predicts that some of the poorest countries in the world could see acute poverty eradicated within 20 years.

The department measured poverty by using a new term called the Multidimensional Poverty Index, or MPI.

It measures the intensity of different deprivations that poor people face including nutrition, education and sanitation and not just income.

article-2294809-18BD0B64000005DC-92_634x365.jpg


Researchers have devised a new term for measuring poverty called the Multidimensional Poverty Index which is shown along the bottom of the graph. The lighter bar shows the original MPI and the darker bar shows the current MPI

Researchers have devised a new term for measuring poverty called the Multidimensional Poverty Index which is shown along the bottom of the graph. The lighter bar shows the original MPI and the darker bar shows the current MPI

If people are deprived in a third or more of ten indicators, the global index identifies them as 'MPI poor'.

The study was carried out by Dr Sabina Alkire and Dr Jose Manuel Roche.

Dr Alkire said: 'Using this measure, we found that reductions in intensity – the percentage of deprivations people experience at the same time – were strongest in relatively poorer countries, such as Ethiopia, Malawi and Senegal.'

In some countries, if progress continues at the same rate, current generations may see the end of acute multidimensional poverty.

If people are deprived in a third or more of ten indicators, the global index identifies them as 'MPI poor'


article-2294809-18BD07C5000005DC-660_634x425.jpg


For example, if the study’s 'star' countries, Nepal, Rwanda, and Bangladesh, continue to reduce poverty at the current rate, they will halve MPI in less than 10 years and eradicate it in 20.

However, the future for other countries does not look as positive.

‘At the current rate of reduction, it will take Ethiopia 45 years to halve multidimensional poverty; in other words, to achieve poverty levels equivalent to those Nigeria has now,’ said OPHI’s Dr José Manuel Roche, who calculated the predictions.

‘Based on the same assumptions, it will take India 41 years and Malawi 74 years to eradicate acute poverty as measured by the MPI.

'But we hope that by providing a more complete and balanced picture, these measures will help spur the eradication of multidimensional poverty.’

Nepal did the best in areas like nutrition, child mortality, electricity, improved flooring and assets.
Rwanda showed the biggest improvement in sanitation and water, and Bangladesh did best in improving sanitation and school attendance.

The MPI can also be broken down to reveal the varying rates of progress in different regions of a country or among different social groups.

For example, in Nepal, although it had an outstanding overall performance, three of the 13 regions lagged behind the rest of the country, with no statistically significant reduction in MPI poverty.

By contrast, Rwanda and Bangladesh achieved significant reductions in both the scale and intensity of multidimensional poverty in every one of their regions.

‘This ability of the MPI to reveal inequalities at a regional level, as well as between social groups, makes it a vital tool for policymakers,’ said Dr Suman Seth, one of OPHI’s research team.

‘The global MPI allows us to compare people’s poverty and see in what ways they are deprived, in order to address these interconnected deprivations and target interventions more accurately.’

The release of the report on changes in poverty over time follows the publication of the MPI in the UN Development Programme's Human Development Report 2013.

In 2013, OPHI found that a total of 1.6billion people are living in multidimensional poverty - more than 30 per cent of the combined populations of the 104 countries analysed.

It is the first time research has tracked overlapping deprivations in health, education and living standards.

Read more: Oxford University study suggests world poverty is rapidly shrinking | Mail Online
 
Last edited by a moderator:
However, multidimensional poverty was reduced least in certain states - such as Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal - and among social groups like the Scheduled Tribes, Muslims, female-headed households and larger households.
These goddamned BIMARU states will never improve in their lifetimes despite have a decent leadership in some. The whole system, including the bureaucracy and socio-centric schemes including compulsory education, employment and healthcare has to be shaken up and improved on a war-footing. These states form more than 45% of the population with the highest population growth in each one of them, which is the biggest worrisome factor about them. They have become the archetypical millstone that has been dragging India's statistics down the depths of misery.
 
Congratulations to Bangladesh and Nepal.I envy you:angry:

Srilanka is also moving fast.Kudos to them.:tup:
 
Back
Top Bottom