What's new

World Justice Project presents Pakistan’s dismal picture

CIS-TRANS

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 19, 2015
Messages
727
Reaction score
-1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
World Justice Project presents Pakistan’s dismal picture
PROUD MOMENT FOR CJP SAQIB NISAR

ISLAMABAD: The World Justice Project (WJP) paints a dismal picture of Pakistan in regard to the rule of law, absence of corruption, and order and security.

In its report for 2017-18, the WJP claims to be an independent, multidisciplinary organisation working to advance the rule of law around the world. It says effective rule of law reduces corruption, combats poverty and disease, and protects people from injustices large and small. It is the foundation for communities of equity, opportunity, and peace —underpinning development, accountable government, and respect for fundamental rights.

The WJP scores range from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating the strongest adherence to the rule of law. Pakistan stands at number 105 among a total of 113 countries under review. In South Asia, other countries are better off as Pakistan comes after India which figures at number 62, Nepal at 58, Sri Lanka at 59 and Bangladesh at 102. However, lawless Afghanistan is ahead of Pakistan in the worst rule of law as Kabul is at number 111.

But, a silver lining is that Pakistan is listed among 21 countries with “improving” rule of law but is still below the median. The WJP divided the countries into declining, stable and improving rule of law categories.

In the order and security group, Pakistan is at the bottom (number 113) of the index. This factor measures how well a society assures the security of persons and property. Security is one of the defining aspects of any rule of law society and is a fundamental function of the state. It is also a precondition for the realisation of the rights and freedoms that the rule of law seeks to advance.

Surprisingly, even Afghanistan, Uganda, Turkey, Philippines, Egypt, Cameroon, Venezuela and Nigeria are better than Pakistan in this category. In the absence of corruption group, Pakistan is ranked number 99 with all the other South Asian countries having a much better picture than it. Nepal stands at number 51, India at 67, Bangladesh at 93, and Sri Lanka at 58. But Afghanistan is at number 109.

The factor of absence of corruption in government considers three forms of corruption: bribery, improper influence by public or private interests, and misappropriation of public funds or other resources. These three forms are examined with respect to government officers in the executive branch, the judiciary, the military, police, and the legislature.

Pakistan is ranked number 111 in the openness of government, which is defined by the extent to which a government shares information, empowers people with tools to hold it accountable, and fosters citizen participation in public policy deliberations. This factor measures whether basic laws and information of legal rights are publicised and evaluates the quality of information published by the government.

Only worst countries in terms of the openness of government than Pakistan are Uganda, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Combodia, Venezuela, Bangladesh, Turkey, China, Ethiopia, Myanmar, Iran, Eypt and Zimbabwe, according to the WJP.

The report also measures the extent to which regulations are fairly and effectively implemented and enforced - regulations, both legal and administrative, structure behaviours within and outside of the government. This factor does not assess which activities a government chooses to regulate, nor does it consider how much regulation of a particular activity is appropriate. Rather, it examines how regulations are implemented and enforced. Pakistan figures at number 105, followed by Guatemala, Zimbabwe, Madagascar, Afghanistan, Egypt, Ethiopia, Cambodia and Venezuela.

The WJP also presents an overall picture not only about Pakistan but all the 113 countries under review. In terms of constraints on government, Islamabad emerges at number 66 in constraints on the government power; at number 80 in open government, at number 100 in fundamental rights, at number 113 (lowest of all the countries) in order and security and at number 105 in regulatory enforcement.

Constraints on government powers mean limits by judiciary and legislature; independent auditing; sanctions for official conduct; non-government checks and lawful transition of power.

Open government relates to publicised law and government data; right to information; civic participation and complaints mechanism. Fundamental rights cover no discrimination; right of life and security; due process of law; freedom of expression, association and religion; right to privacy; and labour rights. Order and security covers absence of crime, civil conflict, and violent redress.

In the sub-Saharan Africa, Cameroon, Zimbabwe and Ethiopia are ahead of Pakistan in the worst rule of law by occupying the position numbers 119, 118 and 107 respectively in the index. Among the 12 low income countries, Afghanistan is ahead of Pakistan. In the 30 lower middle income states, Egypt, Cambodia and Bolivia are ahead of Pakistan by figuring at number 110, 112 and 106 numbers.

Founded by William H Neukom in 2006 as a presidential initiative of the American Bar Association (ABA), and with the initial support of 21 other strategic partners, the WJP transitioned into an independent non-profit organisation in 2009. Its offices are located in Washington, DC and Seattle; Mexico City; and Singapore.

Traditionally, the WJP says the rule of law has been viewed as the domain of lawyers and judges. But everyday issues of safety, rights, justice, and governance affect everybody; everyone is a stakeholder in the rule of law. Based on this, WJP’s mutually-reinforcing lines of business employ a multi-disciplinary approach through original research and data, an active and global network, and practical, locally-led programmes to advance the rule of law worldwide.

The WJP’s Research and Scholarship work supports research about the meaning and measurement of the rule of law, and how it matters for economic, socio-political, and human development. The Rule of Law Research Consortium (RLRC) is a community of leading scholars from a variety of fields harnessing diverse methods and approaches to produce research on the rule of law and its effects on society.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/333628-world-justice-project-presents-pakistan-s-dismal-picture

A real achievement of CJP and justice system of Pakistan and for all those who were declared Sadiq-o-Ameen by courts, Many Many Congratulations. :enjoy:
 
:rofl::rofl::rofl: A report that puts Pakistan even lower then Afghanistan cant be called independent, multidisciplinary organisation working to advance the rule of law around the world. Where atleast 3 head of states have been kicked out on corruption charges n rule of law's implementation in Balochistan and FATA has been exemplary after crushing of terrorism there.

Stopped reading it afterwards. In short this organization n its reports r laughable...i wont be surprised if this organization is from America itself whose 7% population believes that chocolate Milk comes from Brown Cows.

And even bigger idiot is the person who has gave this report enough value to share it on Defence.pk, world's largest Def. forum.
 
World Justice Project ...really?
Some absurd project name, never heard of them, looks like some personal project of an individual on the name of NGO/NPO.

If the local people are happy and satisfied then who cares how they rank them. They will be only bothered about how there enemy is ranked against them :D
 
@CIS-TRANS

Have you read the index, can u tell me the rank of Israel? It seems WJP forgot to publish their record or rank.
US-based thinktanks all dance to the same tune. Without reading it I can predict the US-based study will be lenient on the countries that are allied with US or supporting US interests. The thinktanks have a huge bias against Muslim states as a whole. US thinktanks for last 15+ years have underreported or not reported serious human ights violations of US friends on their Muslims minorities, like India, Phillipines, Israel, Ethiopia, etc... The day Myanmar massacred 120 Rohingyas, Obama hosted dinner fot Myanmar army head in 2012/3.

US wars, attitude towards Muslim countries prove the US thinktanks can't be neutral.
 
The judicial system of Pakistan is very corrupt & only incompetent tun the judiciary.
 
What does have to do with CJP

World Justice Project presents Pakistan’s dismal picture
PROUD MOMENT FOR CJP SAQIB NISAR

ISLAMABAD: The World Justice Project (WJP) paints a dismal picture of Pakistan in regard to the rule of law, absence of corruption, and order and security.

In its report for 2017-18, the WJP claims to be an independent, multidisciplinary organisation working to advance the rule of law around the world. It says effective rule of law reduces corruption, combats poverty and disease, and protects people from injustices large and small. It is the foundation for communities of equity, opportunity, and peace —underpinning development, accountable government, and respect for fundamental rights.

The WJP scores range from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating the strongest adherence to the rule of law. Pakistan stands at number 105 among a total of 113 countries under review. In South Asia, other countries are better off as Pakistan comes after India which figures at number 62, Nepal at 58, Sri Lanka at 59 and Bangladesh at 102. However, lawless Afghanistan is ahead of Pakistan in the worst rule of law as Kabul is at number 111.

But, a silver lining is that Pakistan is listed among 21 countries with “improving” rule of law but is still below the median. The WJP divided the countries into declining, stable and improving rule of law categories.

In the order and security group, Pakistan is at the bottom (number 113) of the index. This factor measures how well a society assures the security of persons and property. Security is one of the defining aspects of any rule of law society and is a fundamental function of the state. It is also a precondition for the realisation of the rights and freedoms that the rule of law seeks to advance.

Surprisingly, even Afghanistan, Uganda, Turkey, Philippines, Egypt, Cameroon, Venezuela and Nigeria are better than Pakistan in this category. In the absence of corruption group, Pakistan is ranked number 99 with all the other South Asian countries having a much better picture than it. Nepal stands at number 51, India at 67, Bangladesh at 93, and Sri Lanka at 58. But Afghanistan is at number 109.

The factor of absence of corruption in government considers three forms of corruption: bribery, improper influence by public or private interests, and misappropriation of public funds or other resources. These three forms are examined with respect to government officers in the executive branch, the judiciary, the military, police, and the legislature.

Pakistan is ranked number 111 in the openness of government, which is defined by the extent to which a government shares information, empowers people with tools to hold it accountable, and fosters citizen participation in public policy deliberations. This factor measures whether basic laws and information of legal rights are publicised and evaluates the quality of information published by the government.

Only worst countries in terms of the openness of government than Pakistan are Uganda, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Combodia, Venezuela, Bangladesh, Turkey, China, Ethiopia, Myanmar, Iran, Eypt and Zimbabwe, according to the WJP.

The report also measures the extent to which regulations are fairly and effectively implemented and enforced - regulations, both legal and administrative, structure behaviours within and outside of the government. This factor does not assess which activities a government chooses to regulate, nor does it consider how much regulation of a particular activity is appropriate. Rather, it examines how regulations are implemented and enforced. Pakistan figures at number 105, followed by Guatemala, Zimbabwe, Madagascar, Afghanistan, Egypt, Ethiopia, Cambodia and Venezuela.

The WJP also presents an overall picture not only about Pakistan but all the 113 countries under review. In terms of constraints on government, Islamabad emerges at number 66 in constraints on the government power; at number 80 in open government, at number 100 in fundamental rights, at number 113 (lowest of all the countries) in order and security and at number 105 in regulatory enforcement.

Constraints on government powers mean limits by judiciary and legislature; independent auditing; sanctions for official conduct; non-government checks and lawful transition of power.

Open government relates to publicised law and government data; right to information; civic participation and complaints mechanism. Fundamental rights cover no discrimination; right of life and security; due process of law; freedom of expression, association and religion; right to privacy; and labour rights. Order and security covers absence of crime, civil conflict, and violent redress.

In the sub-Saharan Africa, Cameroon, Zimbabwe and Ethiopia are ahead of Pakistan in the worst rule of law by occupying the position numbers 119, 118 and 107 respectively in the index. Among the 12 low income countries, Afghanistan is ahead of Pakistan. In the 30 lower middle income states, Egypt, Cambodia and Bolivia are ahead of Pakistan by figuring at number 110, 112 and 106 numbers.

Founded by William H Neukom in 2006 as a presidential initiative of the American Bar Association (ABA), and with the initial support of 21 other strategic partners, the WJP transitioned into an independent non-profit organisation in 2009. Its offices are located in Washington, DC and Seattle; Mexico City; and Singapore.

Traditionally, the WJP says the rule of law has been viewed as the domain of lawyers and judges. But everyday issues of safety, rights, justice, and governance affect everybody; everyone is a stakeholder in the rule of law. Based on this, WJP’s mutually-reinforcing lines of business employ a multi-disciplinary approach through original research and data, an active and global network, and practical, locally-led programmes to advance the rule of law worldwide.

The WJP’s Research and Scholarship work supports research about the meaning and measurement of the rule of law, and how it matters for economic, socio-political, and human development. The Rule of Law Research Consortium (RLRC) is a community of leading scholars from a variety of fields harnessing diverse methods and approaches to produce research on the rule of law and its effects on society.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/333628-world-justice-project-presents-pakistan-s-dismal-picture

A real achievement of CJP and justice system of Pakistan and for all those who were declared Sadiq-o-Ameen by courts, Many Many Congratulations. :enjoy:
 
Then who should be?
If a justice system is flawed of a particular country then chief justice is not to blame solely, legislative assembly is more to blame because they are not making such types of laws that can be helpful in the speedy process of justice.
 
Then who should be?
you the public because jaisi purja ho gi waisa rajah mile ga

:rofl::rofl::rofl: A report that puts Pakistan even lower then Afghanistan cant be called independent, multidisciplinary organisation working to advance the rule of law around the world. Where atleast 3 head of states have been kicked out on corruption charges n rule of law's implementation in Balochistan and FATA has been exemplary after crushing of terrorism there.

Stopped reading it afterwards. In short this organization n its reports r laughable...i wont be surprised if this organization is from America itself whose 7% population believes that chocolate Milk comes from Brown Cows.

And even bigger idiot is the person who has gave this report enough value to share it on Defence.pk, world's largest Def. forum.
denial won't make the corruption go away nor will it get hidden.

nothing worked there (first hand knowledge from 1977 up to 1995) without a little or a lot of "chah pani! be it police, judiciary, or other civil intezamia officials. you could buy heroin or even murder from police stations

Fouji Qayadat zindabaad!

civil intezamia murdabaad!
 
Forget all these judicial and economic surveys. They are all manipulated as concluded by the esteemed members above.
Most worrying is the ranking I posted before , Pakistan is 202 in FIFA football ranking , out of 206 countries ranked. Afghanistan is 175.
Brazil also had a military takeover and dictatorship regime some time back but who remembers that.
Pakistan needs something positive and contribute to the world and all these rankings won't matter.
All we hear of Pakistan is terrorism, osama, drugs,military dictatorship, asylum seekers, etc.
You guys need a paradigm shift.
 
Back
Top Bottom