Cherub786
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2020
- Messages
- 822
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
The colonisation making British living conditions better is a myth, most of the colonisation gains were made by the likes of Rothschild Bank who bankrolled Cecil Rhodes' British South Africa Company.
The reality is even during Medieval times, the average English peasant enjoyed living conditions far superior to those in what is now called the Global South. Much is made of the great wealth of the Mali Empire or how "muh India went from 25% of world GDP to 4% of wood GDP" but the reality is that all these places always gained from colonization, Europeans have contributed towards 97% of all human achievement in the sciences as documented by Charles Murray in his book "Human Accomplishment".
I am actually just saying that Chinese colonisation would benefit the people and more countries should be open to it, resources in exchange for development and infrastructure.
wtf lol
yo cracak *** aint eva heard of white privilige thats what im goin at here homie
mufuggin racis *** whitey
White privilege is a myth, if it actually existed the "White owned" superstructure (media, education finance etc) wouldn't be talking about it. Do you evee hear of this media talking about "Jewish privilege"?
Black privilege is real for sure though,
India like the rest of the Third World needs colonialism from more advanced civilisations like the Europeans, Chinese/Japanese or the Turks (Arabs are no longer major players, centuries of inbreeding has done a helluva number of them).
Pakistan is now going to develop at a rate much higher than India due to Chinese colonisation and the same is true for Africa. Here are the facts. The average Chinese IQ is 105 while the average European/Turk IQ is 95-100 with Europeans being on the higher end of this continuum.
How good a civilisation is is determined by the number of very high IQ people it has, not the average IQ. China with its population of 1.4bn and average IQ of 105 has 140,000 people with an IQ of 150 or above.
There is a greater case for First World immigration into the Third World than the opposite. If our leaders were really keen on human development as opposed to exterminating White people, this is exactly what they would be doing.
China is smart and is doing the right thing, I warn China to never let in its colonial dependents into China for any ling term basis (so only limited to study or training).
Chinese and East Asian people do have the highest IQ, but their intelligence is largely related to mathematics and spatial. They are weak on language and communication. Ashkenazi Jews, who also have the highest IQ, are the exact opposite. That why Jews dominate journalism, literature, media and politics, while East Asians dominate computer sciences and engineering.
But the thing with East Asians is they are an extremely dry and colorless people (again, the exact opposite of Jews). Jews were a mercantile people, with an aptitude for commerce. They were urban and cosmopolitan, moving from place to place. The East Asian, however, is too grounded in the soil. That's because the East Asian is basically a peasant, a rice farmer.
I disagree with you that Chinese colonization and expansion is good for us. Western imperialism and colonialism was good. I respect the White man, especially the Anglo-Saxon. But I am wary of the Chinese. They strike me as people without morality or a conscience. I look at them and it's hard to read. It's probably because of the epicanthic fold, I need to see someone's eyes to really understand them. These people have to excessively smile and use their facial expressions because their eyes are almost invisible.
The Chinese scare me because they are so harsh and don't have the same liberal values and legacy as the West. They never had a John Locke or a Thomas Jefferson. They never had a Gandhi or Martin Luther King Jr either. They will turn us into slaves. America is our only hope for salvation from the Chinese