What's new

Without women, India cannot progress

The colonisation making British living conditions better is a myth, most of the colonisation gains were made by the likes of Rothschild Bank who bankrolled Cecil Rhodes' British South Africa Company.

The reality is even during Medieval times, the average English peasant enjoyed living conditions far superior to those in what is now called the Global South. Much is made of the great wealth of the Mali Empire or how "muh India went from 25% of world GDP to 4% of wood GDP" but the reality is that all these places always gained from colonization, Europeans have contributed towards 97% of all human achievement in the sciences as documented by Charles Murray in his book "Human Accomplishment".

I am actually just saying that Chinese colonisation would benefit the people and more countries should be open to it, resources in exchange for development and infrastructure.

wtf lol

yo cracak *** aint eva heard of white privilige thats what im goin at here homie
mufuggin racis *** whitey


White privilege is a myth, if it actually existed the "White owned" superstructure (media, education finance etc) wouldn't be talking about it. Do you evee hear of this media talking about "Jewish privilege"?

Black privilege is real for sure though,
India like the rest of the Third World needs colonialism from more advanced civilisations like the Europeans, Chinese/Japanese or the Turks (Arabs are no longer major players, centuries of inbreeding has done a helluva number of them).

Pakistan is now going to develop at a rate much higher than India due to Chinese colonisation and the same is true for Africa. Here are the facts. The average Chinese IQ is 105 while the average European/Turk IQ is 95-100 with Europeans being on the higher end of this continuum.

How good a civilisation is is determined by the number of very high IQ people it has, not the average IQ. China with its population of 1.4bn and average IQ of 105 has 140,000 people with an IQ of 150 or above.

There is a greater case for First World immigration into the Third World than the opposite. If our leaders were really keen on human development as opposed to exterminating White people, this is exactly what they would be doing.

China is smart and is doing the right thing, I warn China to never let in its colonial dependents into China for any ling term basis (so only limited to study or training).

Chinese and East Asian people do have the highest IQ, but their intelligence is largely related to mathematics and spatial. They are weak on language and communication. Ashkenazi Jews, who also have the highest IQ, are the exact opposite. That why Jews dominate journalism, literature, media and politics, while East Asians dominate computer sciences and engineering.
But the thing with East Asians is they are an extremely dry and colorless people (again, the exact opposite of Jews). Jews were a mercantile people, with an aptitude for commerce. They were urban and cosmopolitan, moving from place to place. The East Asian, however, is too grounded in the soil. That's because the East Asian is basically a peasant, a rice farmer.
I disagree with you that Chinese colonization and expansion is good for us. Western imperialism and colonialism was good. I respect the White man, especially the Anglo-Saxon. But I am wary of the Chinese. They strike me as people without morality or a conscience. I look at them and it's hard to read. It's probably because of the epicanthic fold, I need to see someone's eyes to really understand them. These people have to excessively smile and use their facial expressions because their eyes are almost invisible.
The Chinese scare me because they are so harsh and don't have the same liberal values and legacy as the West. They never had a John Locke or a Thomas Jefferson. They never had a Gandhi or Martin Luther King Jr either. They will turn us into slaves. America is our only hope for salvation from the Chinese
 
.
Religion means nothing, only blood and race is real.

Really, religion means nothing eh? Well in that case, according to you israel should be disqualified and dismantled as a state. Because the entire premise on which this apartheid state was built, was that "God gave them this land (Holy Land)."

As for your "religion means nothing" argument, save it for those who argue the religion card. And just so you know Islam isn't a religion, it is way of life. To define Islam as a religion is childish, since Islam is not based on ritualistic, or that delves into objectified symbolism, clergy system or pope culture.

The Afghans existed before Islam and will exist after it if they stay true. Islam has the same problems as Christianity in that it is a universal religion and not one of blood and soil.

Afghans existed before Islam? Do you know that Islam stems from the Abrahamic Faith? Have you any idea how old that is? The Abrahamic Faith existed before the time of the Jews. Islam does not have any problems, people have problems. Humans are fallible, that's a known fact. Islam was there to validate and set the records straight when it comes to what they (Jews) did to Jesus the One and Only True Messiah of God, to John the Baptist, to the blessed Virgin Mary and to Prophet Zachariah.

Before God, all are equal, regardless of your race, your blood, your color, your riches or your poverty. Who ascends before God, is one who has faith, not based blood or race.

Disdain for white people is to be expected for a variety of reasons, this disdain doesn't come from Pashtuns to be honest as they know who they are as a people and what they have achieved, the other groups are sadly very bitter and angry.

Hubris is not part of me, nor is part of Pukhtuns. We don't give a crap about who is bitter and who isn't. But Pukhtuns do have a very deep sense of belief in Allah Subhanahu Wata'aalah and the last of HIS Prophets, Muhammad Alaihi Salaat-u-Wassalam. Those who follow Muhammad Alaihi Salaat-u-Wassalam in honesty and with integrity, they are our brothers in Islam, regardless of whether they are Pakistani, Iranian, Uzbek, Arab, Egyptian, Chinese, Russian or heck even indian.

That's the power of faith in Allah, where even a White Muslim, true to Islam, is my brother in faith. Race and blood is for those who have hubris, who have this exceptionalist mentality

What did the Europeans loot? GDP only grew in those countries under white rule, standard of living and population also went up. The truth is Europeans have been by far the most benevolent colonisers in history.

Really, well then, lemme take you back to school on that subject, shall.


"1765, shortly after the East India Company took control of the subcontinent and established a monopoly over Indian trade.

Here’s how it worked. The East India Company began collecting taxes in India, and then cleverly used a portion of those revenues (about a third) to fund the purchase of Indian goods for British use. In other words, instead of paying for Indian goods out of their own pocket, British traders acquired them for free, “buying” from peasants and weavers using money that had just been taken from them."



"France compelled African states to sign a harmful pact which demanded the latter to deposit their national monetary reserves into the former’s Central Bank. France then allows them to access only 15 percent of the money in any given year. Should the need arise for more funds; they have to borrow their own deposited money from the French Treasury at commercial rates."


"Perkins' function, according to the book, was to convince the political and financial leadership of developing countries to accept enormous development loans from institutions like the World Bank and USAID. Saddled with debts they could not hope to pay, such countries would then be forced to acquiesce to political pressure from the United States on a variety of issues. Perkins argues that these nations were effectively neutralized politically, with their wealth gaps driven wider and their long-term economies crippled. In this capacity, Perkins recounts his meetings with some prominent individuals, including Graham Greene and Omar Torrijos. Perkins describes the role of an economic hit man as follows:"

Confessions of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins.


I could keep this up all day long!
 
.
Chinese and East Asian people do have the highest IQ, but their intelligence is largely related to mathematics and spatial. They are weak on language and communication. Ashkenazi Jews, who also have the highest IQ, are the exact opposite. That why Jews dominate journalism, literature, media and politics, while East Asians dominate computer sciences and engineering.
But the thing with East Asians is they are an extremely dry and colorless people (again, the exact opposite of Jews). Jews were a mercantile people, with an aptitude for commerce. They were urban and cosmopolitan, moving from place to place. The East Asian, however, is too grounded in the soil. That's because the East Asian is basically a peasant, a rice farmer.
I disagree with you that Chinese colonization and expansion is good for us. Western imperialism and colonialism was good. I respect the White man, especially the Anglo-Saxon. But I am wary of the Chinese. They strike me as people without morality or a conscience. I look at them and it's hard to read. It's probably because of the epicanthic fold, I need to see someone's eyes to really understand them. These people have to excessively smile and use their facial expressions because their eyes are almost invisible.
The Chinese scare me because they are so harsh and don't have the same liberal values and legacy as the West. They never had a John Locke or a Thomas Jefferson. They never had a Gandhi or Martin Luther King Jr either. They will turn us into slaves. America is our only hope for salvation from the Chinese
LoL, yellow peril, something keeps this guy up at night.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom