Bhairava
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 5,160
- Reaction score
- 0
Hinduism was brought to India by Aryan invasion of India.
There was no Aryan and there was no invasion.
Hinduism developed solely on the lands of the Indian subcontinent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hinduism was brought to India by Aryan invasion of India.
Hinduism was brought to India by Aryan invasion of India.

`The initial settlement took place 65,000 years ago in the Andamans and in ancient south India around the same time, which led to population growth in this part,'' said Thangarajan. He added, ``At a later stage, 40,000 years ago, the ancient north Indians emerged which in turn led to rise in numbers here. But at some point of time, the ancient north and the ancient south mixed, giving birth to a different set of population. And that is the population which exists now and there is a genetic relationship between the population within India.''
I didn't ask for your opinion
I repeat : Show me a UN declaration that states colonies are not nations.![]()
The perverted affinity for Euro-centric pseudo science now, eh?
The so called Aryan invasion as per genetic evidence happened 40,000 years ago.
Unless you are trying to prove Hinduism has roots to over 40,000 years, you are merely making a retard of yourself, as always
Aryan-Dravidian divide a myth: Study
India was a nation, called Britain before Independence in 1947. So India was part of a nation with the capital in London. So prior to 1947, the correct answer to the question, what is the capital of India? London.



There was no Aryan and there was no invasion.
Hinduism developed solely on the lands of the Indian subcontinent.
There was no Aryan and there was no invasion.
Hinduism developed solely on the lands of the Indian subcontinent.
It's sad that Indians are ignoring the overwhelming evidence of Aryan invasion. Any serious history experts anywhere outside of India do not doubt Aryan invasion. Only wack job revisionist Indian historians are ignoring the indisputable facts. Look, if you do not embrace you past, no one would take you seriously.


India was a nation, called Britain before Independence in 1947. So India was part of a nation with the capital in London. So prior to 1947, the correct answer to the question, what is the capital of India? London.
get use to it pal
Thats called "Indian logic"=a sovereign country while the defence and foreign affair were both controlled by the British.get use to it pal


More and more comprehension fail.
Where did i mention India as a sovereign country under British rule?
Looks like more of Chini logic here.![]()

In reality there never was a Sino - India War, 1962. Indians just ran and ran and ran at the first sight of Mao's soldiers.

Who say Indians are not smart?
"who came first, Chicken or egg" you can keep demanding for your so-called UN approval answers
all day long while denying historical "facts", have fun![]()
Some faithful deluded internet poster or the UN?
More and more comprehension fail.
Where did i mention India as a sovereign country under British rule?
Looks like more of Chini logic here.![]()
Still don't get what i am conveying do you?
Whose facts ?Some faithful deluded internet poster or the UN?