What's new

Will India and China fight a war again?

Hinduism was brought to India by Aryan invasion of India.


The perverted affinity for Euro-centric pseudo science now, eh?


The so called Aryan invasion as per genetic evidence happened 40,000 years ago.

Unless you are trying to prove Hinduism has roots to over 40,000 years, you are merely making a retard of yourself, as always :lol:

`The initial settlement took place 65,000 years ago in the Andamans and in ancient south India around the same time, which led to population growth in this part,'' said Thangarajan. He added, ``At a later stage, 40,000 years ago, the ancient north Indians emerged which in turn led to rise in numbers here. But at some point of time, the ancient north and the ancient south mixed, giving birth to a different set of population. And that is the population which exists now and there is a genetic relationship between the population within India.''

Aryan-Dravidian divide a myth: Study
 
I didn't ask for your opinion :lol:

I repeat : Show me a UN declaration that states colonies are not nations. :wave:

India was a nation, called Britain before Independence in 1947. So India was part of a nation with the capital in London. So prior to 1947, the correct answer to the question, what is the capital of India? London.
 
In reality there never was a Sino - India War, 1962. Indians just ran and ran and ran at the first sight of Mao's soldiers.
 
The perverted affinity for Euro-centric pseudo science now, eh?


The so called Aryan invasion as per genetic evidence happened 40,000 years ago.

Unless you are trying to prove Hinduism has roots to over 40,000 years, you are merely making a retard of yourself, as always :lol:



Aryan-Dravidian divide a myth: Study


It's sad that Indians are ignoring the overwhelming evidence of Aryan invasion. Any serious history experts anywhere outside of India do not doubt Aryan invasion. Only wack job revisionist Indian historians are ignoring the indisputable facts. Look, if you do not embrace you past, no one would take you seriously.
 
India was a nation, called Britain before Independence in 1947. So India was part of a nation with the capital in London. So prior to 1947, the correct answer to the question, what is the capital of India? London.

Comprehension fail! :lol:

Not surprising you come from an unrecognized nation :laugh:

I repeat for the third, Show me a UN declaration that states colonies are not nations. :wave:
 
There was no Aryan and there was no invasion.

Hinduism developed solely on the lands of the Indian subcontinent.

Northern Indian languages are part of Indo European languages brought in by the aryans. They also brought in Hinduism and your beloved caste system. Be proud and do not deny your past and ancestors.

There was no Aryan and there was no invasion.

Hinduism developed solely on the lands of the Indian subcontinent.

Northern Indian languages are part of Indo European languages brought in by the aryans. They also brought in Hinduism and your beloved caste system. Be proud and do not deny your past and ancestors.
 
It's sad that Indians are ignoring the overwhelming evidence of Aryan invasion. Any serious history experts anywhere outside of India do not doubt Aryan invasion. Only wack job revisionist Indian historians are ignoring the indisputable facts. Look, if you do not embrace you past, no one would take you seriously.

More comprehension fail. :lol:

Where did i deny Aryan invasion theory.

Learn how to read :wave:
 
India was a nation, called Britain before Independence in 1947. So India was part of a nation with the capital in London. So prior to 1947, the correct answer to the question, what is the capital of India? London.

Thats called "Indian logic"=a sovereign country while the defence and foreign affair were both controlled by the British.:lol: get use to it pal
 
Thats called "Indian logic"=a sovereign country while the defence and foreign affair were both controlled by the British.:lol: get use to it pal

More and more comprehension fail.:laugh:

Where did i mention India as a sovereign country under British rule?

Looks like more of Chini logic here. :lol:
 
In the last few thousand years, the greatest military victory that the poor Chinese have achieved is in winning a skirmish against India and even though that was a victory for the Chinese - there was no official victory - no Treaty of Surrender as such. The Chinese withdrew when they knew the Indians were regrouping.

The Chinese are incapable of winning a full fledged war. They like being ruled. By Brits. By Japs. By Emperors. By Commies. They have never been a free society.
 
More and more comprehension fail.

Where did i mention India as a sovereign country under British rule?

Looks like more of Chini logic here. :lol:

Who say Indians are not smart? "who came first, Chicken or egg" you can keep demanding for your so-called UN approval answers all day long while denying historical "facts", have fun:azn:
 
In reality there never was a Sino - India War, 1962. Indians just ran and ran and ran at the first sight of Mao's soldiers.

yeah IA ran and ran and ran and it took 9 years of running for IA soldiers to reach BD border... which we made free :woot:

BD is India's *****. Live with that !!
 
Who say Indians are not smart?


"who came first, Chicken or egg" you can keep demanding for your so-called UN approval answers

Still don't get what i am conveying do you?

all day long while denying historical "facts", have fun:azn:

Whose facts ? :lol: Some faithful deluded internet poster or the UN?
 
More and more comprehension fail.:laugh:

Where did i mention India as a sovereign country under British rule?

Looks like more of Chini logic here. :lol:

In modern usage, a nation is a sovereign nation. Go read up on Webster dictionary for the definition.

Still don't get what i am conveying do you?



Whose facts ? :lol: Some faithful deluded internet poster or the UN?

Sounds like to you, Indian nation only exists because of UN recognition.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom