What's new

Why Whites, not Chinese, dominated the world despite inventions

Try out India 2030, the comments there are more interesting.

Thank you for making my dull work morning brighter, I haven't laugh so much in a while:omghaha:

But I can't tell if this was made as a prank or the guys behind it were serious, it seems so childish

If serious:

- inferiority complex was strong in those people
- every nation has it's supremacists/retarded people

Edit: just read that it's part of a movie, a satire.:tup:
 
great.

looks like the pakistani false flaggers and CPC bots have turned this into another india bashing thread. well done MODS.

now can we discuss the topic at hand?
 
First of all, you need to watch the India superpower 2030 video to determine who is the real racist. I'm all for judging people by the content of the character. But its today's black racists that state that because my child is an Asian, a black child with far lower GPA would be accepted over my child. That is racism against Asians as neither me nor my child nor my ancestors never done anything to oppress others. Also, the white people today in America, even the southern whites, should not pay for the deeds of their ancestors.

I'm still waiting for the day of Martin Luther King Jr, that we are judge by the content of our character instead of color of our skin.

LOL, Whiteman is banned the second I am released.

Sucks, would have wanted a conversation with him. I agree, they discriminate against East Asians simply because we do the best in school

Turks>Indians

Humans>Indians
 
But its today's black racists that state that because my child is an Asian, a black child with far lower GPA would be accepted over my child.

It's not black "racists" as much as non-black liberals who defend affirmative action programs. African-Americans are not exactly running the show in the US.

Also, the white people today in America, even the southern whites, should not pay for the deeds of their ancestors.

The debate over affirmative action is complex, as I am sure you know. You have articulated one point of view, but the majority view, at least as far as legislation is concerned, is that affirmative action continues to be needed.
 
It's not black "racists" as much as non-black liberals who defend affirmative action programs. African-Americans are not exactly running the show in the US.



The debate over affirmative action is complex, as I am sure you know. You have articulated one point of view, but the majority view, at least as far as legislation is concerned, is that affirmative action continues to be needed.

This is not the majority of the views of the legislature. But its the majority view of most none blacks and Hispanics. The government is going bankrupt because of the subsidies.

The civil rights org need a reason to exists and getting more grants or donations. That is why racist is kept alive. So both liberals and black civil rights org have persisted affirmative action.
 
LOL yes yes kids you were all great civilizations happy now ? :coffee:
 
Nope no such thing as Indian civilization in present day India, India didnt exist before 1947..

It was The Indus Valley (Pakistan) which made so called "Indian" civilization.
Present day Indians are just some dravidians from Africa. (where no civlization was made)
Indo-Aryan (Pakistan) are real inheritors

Pakistan didn't exist before 1974. Present day Pakistanis are from invaders, there is no such thing as Dravidians and present day Indians are the real Indo-Aryans.
 
No, not at all you intellectually inept clown.

The Vedas WAS written by Hindus. Hindus who descended from what is today Eastern Europe and basically created your culture, history, traditions, religions, and philosophy for you.

Maybe you need to get your head examined. Christianity in 1500 BC? I heard Indian education was as bad as the sub-Saharans, but I certainly didn't think it was THIS bad.

By 3000BC, Whites were spreading all throughout the Indian subcontinent. There they would remain in power up until comparatively recently. Hinduism dates from 1000BC or so. The conclusion that Whites created this religion is pretty hard to escape.

The ancient Whites in India carved themselves as Whites, described themselves as Whites (many with blonde hair), distinguished themselves from lower castes by their color.

I don't know how to break it to you, but those dark people living in the muck in all those truthful pictures you see on the internet are not the people who "invented" the zero; it was White people. (Not that I couldn't fill several pages on how moronic it is to claim that anyone had to "invent" zero. I assure you that all prior White civilizations understood the concept of nothingness just fine, and Archimedes even developed calculus without having a symbol for zero.)

See how much more sense this makes? Instead of looking at the poor, ignorant people in India and wondering how they could ever have fallen so far, we instead understand that they were always this low, and the people who did all those great things in the past were the same people who do all these great things today. Much simpler. Occam's Razor!

Ancient Indians described themselves as white, where? Do you have any proof for what you have written? In India a skin color similar to gold is desired not white. Why do you people steal Indians words like 'aryans' etc to compensate for your white inferiority complex? Can't you be satisfied with what you are?
 
Pakistan didn't exist before 1974. Present day Pakistanis are from invaders, there is no such thing as Dravidians and present day Indians are the real Indo-Aryans.

Dravidian is the language and people of Southern India. The northern India is a mixture between Indo-Aryan and Dravidians. Though Indo-Aryan gave India Hinduism and Buddhism, little traces of Indo-Aryan exists in India.
 
Dravidian is the language and people of Southern India. The northern India is a mixture between Indo-Aryan and Dravidians. Though Indo-Aryan gave India Hinduism and Buddhism, little traces of Indo-Aryan exists in India.

Thank you for your "Indian history 101". We have enough sources of our own which we can read and interpret and dont need non Indians telling us about our past.
 
Dravidian is the language and people of Southern India. The northern India is a mixture between Indo-Aryan and Dravidians. Though Indo-Aryan gave India Hinduism and Buddhism, little traces of Indo-Aryan exists in India.

In the same sentence you say Dravidian is a language then you say it is people. Make up your mind about what it is first. It was never an ethnicity. Not only a little Indo-Aryan genes exist a lot of it exists.
 
Turks>Indians

China<>Turky>Pakistan<India.......

Dravidian is the language and people of Southern India. The northern India is a mixture between Indo-Aryan and Dravidians. Though Indo-Aryan gave India Hinduism and Buddhism, little traces of Indo-Aryan exists in India.

In a book written by you?
 
In the same sentence you say Dravidian is a language then you say it is people. Make up your mind about what it is first. It was never an ethnicity. Not only a little Indo-Aryan genes exist a lot of it exists.

Its a language family and the people as well. Even though its not an ethnicity, it can be use to describe people that speak Dravidian languages and you know what they are.

Whatever genes existed from Aryan invasion are the Aryan genes. the Aryans created Hinduism to separate its own people from the original population of India. But it didn't work out as higher caste can take multiple lower caste women as bed partners and this created mixed higher caste blood line.

China<>Turky>Pakistan<India.......



In a book written by you?

Its a known fact. Don't try to recreate existing history.
 
Its a language family and the people as well. Even though its not an ethnicity, it can be use to describe people that speak Dravidian languages and you know what they are.

Whatever genes existed from Aryan invasion are the Aryan genes. the Aryans created Hinduism to separate its own people from the original population of India. But it didn't work out as higher caste can take multiple lower caste women as bed partners and this created mixed higher caste blood line.



Its a known fact. Don't try to recreate existing history.

East Asians seem to be the new Whites. Shows that White is not a race, but a condition of mind.:omghaha:
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom