Arsalan
THINK TANK CHAIRMAN
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
- Messages
- 18,178
- Reaction score
- 65
- Country
- Location
it was never a one for one replacement procedure so the supposedly "required" number you mentioned are not right sir.Imran bhai planned induction reduced to 150
We need to replace 450 aircrafts it means we need 300 more jets
Either buy 50 used F 16 and 150 J 10 and 60 SU 35 bring PAF at par atleast
PAF is full of useless people they want to play catching up game we are 10 years behind IAF not in numbers but in technology
We lost brilliant people of PAF like air chief NOOR KHAN who gave us upper hand over Indians till mid 90s we are getting behind
Don't agree with you horses for courses
How in world do you see it can challenge SU 30 which has double the range and power before our JF 17 seas it it has fired a missile on thunder
Talks are easy most of these PAF guys in 99 kargil war thumping their chest with similar slogans that you will see if and IAF jet comes we kick it
Result shows PAF has not played any role they were behind iaf in terms of tech not having BVR shows how neglect mindset they have not giving cover to Atlantique ASW again failure
US Navy seals stormed at abbotabad not a single PAF jet scrambled
PAF lacked alot in buying atleast high altitude airdefence system
PAF opened programme JF 17 to replace old 450 jets but now they are getting 150 thunders
PAF opened thunder project saying us not selling F16 we need something closer the F 16 capabilities but yet again they buying sanctioned prone F 16 blunder
PAF now have two potent single engine jet why mirage jet now it just make no sense
Bottom line is if PAF continue this type of negligence than GOD help us either lower their budget pass on Pakistan Navy they need more than these useless thinkers
I'm Pakistani and it is my right to criticise for the betterment
I don't have any enemy ship with PAF but their history shows me they deserve a criticism not showing professionalism to job given by nation