Why Kerala has no beef with beef.

[SpArK]

Why don't you translate it for us ?

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

I am not promoting any religious viewpoint here.
Stating that religious dictates of one religion must not apply to other religions is not promoting religious view point.
And needless to say that those who don't agree to your Hindutva view point are not criminals.

You are promoting your view point. How does it matter where it comes from ? ........ maybe it comes from a deep seated hatred. That is your problem, not mine.

You are not required to agree with me as to who constitutes a "criminal". the Majority decides and then you do get have a choice in the matter. If you are a criminal, you get treated like one. You are free to protest, but it makes not one iota of difference.

How it is relevant here? There are vegetarian Hindus, non-vegetarian Hindus, beef eating Hindus, pork eating Hindus, chicken eating Hindus (which was a taboo in the past), there are other Indians belonging to other faiths, and there are atheists, all of them don't need to follow your Hindutva rules.

That is the ONLY thing relevant here.

You are the one going around claiming that Beef eating is permitted for Hindus. So why are you beating around the Bush ?
Just come straight to the point.

Which Hindu scriptures do you follow ? What hindu scripture do you believe in ?

I am not asking you to follow my rules, I am asking YOUR RULES ............ why is that so confusing ? Its a fairly simple and straight forward question.

 

[dray]

Instead of beating around the bush, why don't you just tell us what Hindu Scriptures you believe in ?

Irrelevant.

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

............ this is embarrassing for you. Are you saying you do not know what you have posted ?

I ask again, please provide the translation. I am willing to wait as long as necessary.

 

[SpArK]

............ this is embarrassing for you. Are you saying you do not know what you have posted ?

I ask again, please provide the translation. I am willing to wait as long as necessary.

...................................................................

.........................................?


.................................................

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

Irrelevant.

LOL why ? You are saying MY RULES suck. I am asking for YOUR RULES.

How is that irrelevant ? Do you want to live in a world with NO RULES ? ............. are you Arvind Kejriwal ?

...................................................................

.........................................?


.................................................

I am still waiting ............. hurry up.

 

[ZooZoo]

Can Hindu and Muslim in Kerla Eat Pork together, The way they are eating Cow??

Or Intellect and Secularism stops where Pork starts???

 

[SrNair]

Not correct.

Though Caste is mostly fixed, it go up and down the laddar with ease. Caste is 1000CE onward phenomenon and it originated from artisan guilds, distinct profession, Tribal identities, and warring clan culture. There is no metion of caste system in whole HIndu literature. It is not equivalent to varna system. The difference of mobility in varna system and caste system is that , while in Varna system an individual could change his social position on his own (Vishwamitra is a obvious example that comes to my mind) ; in latter day caste system , it is whole caste which goes up or down. An individual by himself could not caste, but he could lose caste and become an outcaste , a Chandala, if he eats meat. Caste ,today, are fixed by government decree, not be social and religious norms.




Correction: Aryabhatta studied at Kusumapura university, not Nalanda.




Nalanda was a predominantly Buddhist religious university. Most of Hindus preferred Takshashila for non-Religious education and Kashi for religious.

Experts saying both that possibility.But I still remember What I had read in that book.

 

[SpArK]

I am still waiting ............. hurry up.

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

Let me make it easier for you, admit you were a fool and that you do not know what it says and I will translate it for you ............ how does that sound ?

 

[SpArK]

Let me make it easier for you, admit you were a fool and that you do not know what it says and I will translate it for you ............ how does that sound ?

 

[dray]

That is the ONLY thing relevant here.

You are the one going around claiming that Beef eating is permitted for Hindus. So why are you beating around the Bush ?
Just come straight to the point.

Which Hindu scriptures do you follow ? What hindu scripture do you believe in ?

I am not asking you to follow my rules, I am asking YOUR RULES ............ why is that so confusing ? Its a fairly simple and straight forward question.

IRRELEVANT!

My rules need not apply to you and your rules don't apply on me, and certainly not on non-Hindus and atheists.

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

View attachment 201467

The very next line says,

'The consumption of meat (is befitting) for sacrifices,' that is declared to be a rule made by the Gods; but to persist (in using it) on other (occasions) is said to be a proceeding worthy of Rakshasas.

IRRELEVANT!

My rules need not apply to you and your rules don't apply on me, and certainly not on non-Hindus and atheists.

Which is why I am asking you which HINDU SCRIPTURES you believe in.

That way we can all blame the Hindu Scriptures and ITS RULES.

Not MY RULE and YOUR RULE

 

[dray]

you are promoting your view point. How does it matter where it comes from ? ........ maybe it comes from a deep seated hatred. That is your problem, not mine.

You are not required to agree with me as to who constitutes a "criminal". the Majority decides and then you do get have a choice in the matter. If you are a criminal, you get treated like one. You are free to protest, but it makes not one iota of difference.

Irrelevant baseless blabbering. Mobs don't rule this country.

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

Irrelevant baseless blabbering. Mobs don't rule this country.

That is right, the mobs vote and form governments of the majority and then laws are made by those majority which has to be followed by the minority. But that is elementary democracy and hence irrelevant and unnecessary

Just tell us which Hindu Scripture you follow and make this debate Relevant again.