Why India never had a chance against Pakistan and eventually backed down - Analysis

[Titanium100]

Threshold still exists for conventional war. Nuclear war is not like a game. I don't see any nuclear war but I know conventional war can happen. They will never fire nuclear missile and we also will never fire. They know they have numerical superiority. Srilanka is not in Pakistani camp as well. United states supports India and this American support is more important than any other country on this globe. I firmly believe that India will attack Pakistan. They will attack after bomb blast and trust me, we will see bloodbath. War shouldn't be priority but India is mad and we have no choice but to prepare. 27 Feb is past. Don't live in past. Prepare for future.

The US can't really fight on the eastern theatre with a nuclear state. India is a large paper tiger. There is bigger likelihood that Pakistan attacks them sometime down the line in the future.

And Blitzkrieg them. Pakistan needs to be the aggressor and the one initiating the offensive charge immediately into Indian territories bringing the fight inside India within mintues.

Their capabilities and numbers are an illusion it is not like Pakistan is not advancing everyday in military capabilties.

India is truly a scaried deer. I can see thru them which Is why I won't fall for bluffs. Example I wouldn't use the same tactics against China it would be suicidal let them come out or meet them half way but with the Indians you bring it to them and you do it quickly..

You have to force yourself upon them not the other way around.. Just like last time! Allover again

 

[StraightEdge]

It's again that time of the year where we need to speak to IMF

 

[yuba]

Fill your analysis out a little more about how you have done all those things not joking would like to see how you got to this conclusion and how will this blitzkrieg attack will be done . Im bored know little about this but it is interesting

 

[Arsalan345]

The US can't really fight on the eastern theatre with a nuclear state. India is a large paper tiger. There is bigger likelihood that Pakistan attacks them sometime down the line in the future.

And Blitzkrieg them. Pakistan needs to be the aggressor and the one initiating the offensive charge immediately into Indian territories bringing the fight inside India within mintues.

Their capabilities and numbers are an illusion it is not like Pakistan is not advancing everyday in military capabilties.

India is truly a scaried deer. I can see thru them which Is why I won't fall for bluffs. Example I wouldn't use the same tactics against China it would be suicidal let them come out or meet them half way but with the Indians you bring it to them and you do it quickly

I agree but American diplomatic support is more than enough for India. When Americans say something, every country follows. Diplomatic support is very important during war time. Anyway I agree with you on our aggressive posture theory. Problem is this aggressive posture is now missing. We are fully defensive. Numerical superiority will eventually help them in case of war but we should look for short wars. They know there is a threshold and they exploited it on feb26. They are a country who analyze weakness.

India is an existential threat for Pakistan but India is also not fool so they are also looking for skirmishes, kargil type wars, not full scale because they don't want nuclear missiles to be used during war.

This numerical superiority doesn't work for them in skirmishes. Large scale war will help them but they don't want it and we also don't want it. I can safely say that they will attack Pakistan again in the next upcoming bomb blast and targets are many but bahawalpur is their primary choice. All these rafales, new missiles, they aren't for fun. They will use it all against us and we are ready but must invest more money on air force. Buy aim 9x sidewinder and amraam D.

 

[Titanium100]

I agree but American diplomatic support is more than enough for India. When Americans say something, every country follows. Diplomatic support is very important during war time. Anyway I agree with you on our aggressive posture theory. Problem is this aggressive posture is now missing. We are fully defensive. Numerical superiority will eventually help them in case of war but we should look for short wars. They know there is a threshold and they exploited it on feb26. They are a country who analyze weakness.

India is an existential threat for Pakistan but India is also not fool so they are also looking for skirmishes, kargil type wars, not full scale because they don't want nuclear missiles to be used in war.

I am not talking skirmishes but if things were to go out of hand. The Numbers are an illusion and majority of the people are peasants anyways. Forget the numbers it's a pointless stats.

Just train your army well, keeping arming yourself with consistency like your doing now. Add offensive to your doctrine if you don't have one.. India is a rich fertile land there is plenty to gain expanding to their territory if there was a miscalculation happen.

I am talking about the Delhi, Mumbai etc etc deccan regions etc etc...

But regardless of what Pakistan has to go on the offensive and has to go for broke in such conflict and regardless of who starts the conflict... An aggressive offensive has to be a garanti

 

[newb3e]

until and unless we get our house under order ie no interface clear Pakistan of corrupts and Pakistans interests over Military incs financial interests then only we can fight our enemies!

 

[Talwar e Pakistan]

I can't tell if your trolling or actually serious, hard to tell on defence.pk nowadays.

 

[Ghost Hobbit]

Do you think india will attack after you start crying again after indians are banned from PDF for insulting Pakistan and Islam?

why should india attack? We got what we wanted.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

why should india attack? We got what we wanted.

Then why do you open defecators call Azad Kashmir "Pakistan occupied Kashmir"........

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

I agree but American diplomatic support is more than enough for India. When Americans say something, every country follows. Diplomatic support is very important during war time. Anyway I agree with you on our aggressive posture theory. Problem is this aggressive posture is now missing. We are fully defensive. Numerical superiority will eventually help them in case of war but we should look for short wars. They know there is a threshold and they exploited it on feb26. They are a country who analyze weakness.

India is an existential threat for Pakistan but India is also not fool so they are also looking for skirmishes, kargil type wars, not full scale because they don't want nuclear missiles to be used during war.

This numerical superiority doesn't work for them in skirmishes. Large scale war will help them but they don't want it and we also don't want it. I can safely say that they will attack Pakistan again in the next upcoming bomb blast and targets are many but bahawalpur is their primary choice. All these rafales, new missiles, they aren't for fun. They will use it all against us and we are ready but must invest more money on air force. Buy aim 9x sidewinder and amraam D.

If they had the capability and bravery they would have done do by now. But like you, the indians are weak, emasculated, beta little weiner men..........

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

India and Pak relationship is inversely proportional! If Pak gets relatively stronger India gets relatively weaker.....

 

[Saudang]

Nice satirical write. @Titanium100 you have a new fan in me for your satire

 

[Goritoes]

It's again that time of the year where we need to speak to IMF

No, You should talk to USA, that's where most of your country's Aid comes from

 

[swnjo]

I am not talking skirmishes but if things were to go out of hand. The Numbers are an illusion and majority of the people are peasants anyways. Forget the numbers it's a pointless stats.

Just train your army well, keeping arming yourself with consistency like your doing now. Add offensive to your doctrine if you don't have one.. India is a rich fertile land there is plenty to gain expanding to their territory if there was a miscalculation happen.

I am talking about the Delhi, Mumbai etc etc deccan regions etc etc...

But regardless of what Pakistan has to go on the offensive and has to go for broke in such conflict and regardless of who starts the conflict... An aggressive offensive has to be a garanti

 

[araz]

There is just alot of misconceptions surrounding India and illusions.

Pakistan just has to many support in central Asian states meaning at the event of a conflict India will take on more then Pakistan but a civilization bordering Pakistan itself. Pakistans allies in the region is to vaste and India's are none-existent even Sri-Lanka is in Pakistan's camp leaving India alone with Bangladesh who doesn't even want anything with India.

Pakistan-China relations means that even Myanmar and North Korea is in Pakistan camp one way or another. Then you have the whole Mid-east which is virtually Pakistan camp plus Turkey. From China to Turkey is a Pakistan camp even behind India in South east asia in ASEAN.

India had to back out from it's aggressive policies due to economical reasons because if they escalate anti-islam rhetoric they could face blockades around the world. Every 3rd country in the world is a muslim country (We were busy expanding yesterday when they were on diapers and worshipping cows)

On the military front: India is fearful and doesn't know what to expect after the 2019 bashing.

It had to withdraw for 3 reasons:

1.The Strength of Pakistan (being incapable of overcoming them militarily and as a matter fact Pakistan is the favourite in a conflict due to vaste disunity in India)

2. Economical reasons and fears of facing wide and large scale blockades and sanctions.

3. With little to no friends in the region and being politically isolated by Pakistan so technically India had no choice but join hands with Pakistan. They hold all the cards and beginning trade with Pakistan is more beneficial for India then the other way so that India gets access to central ASIA instead of being land-blocked,

Pakistan has defeated India in the politics, Military front and diplomacy to the point where India had no other choice but to give allegiance to Pakistan. India needs that trade corridor via Pakistan to stay open and useful for it's economical link to central Asia and europe.

What kind of delusional post is this? I love my country but to say that a country in a debt trap surviving on IMF bailouts will fight with a country with surplus and 7 times more larger than us is stuff of delusions. I would have thought if we were muslims in the true sense of the word at least Allah Azza wa jal will come to our help but that remains questionable for a nation of bigots and thieves. Please post something rational before one can respond to it.
The only reason India ba ked down was firstly the shock delivered by the PAF and secondly there has been no incidence of 2 Nuclear armed nations going to full blown war primarily for fear of MAD. Modi had achieved all the aims from his drama and his media had turned the lunacy of the attack int9 a moral victory to appease the Indian masses. There was simply no need to take more on. Strategically PAF had kept the response to a wrap on the knuckles rather than a full blown slap on the face which gave India no need to respond with escalation. Pak further eased the tension by releasing WC Abhinanadon Wwiyhin 48 hrs as a gesture of peace.
A
A