Why Bangladesh is a bigger threat to India than Pakistan today

[dray]

1.The priest killed in N Bengal was over a woman. The Ramkrisna Mission threat was over quarrel regarding collections these organizers swindle.
2. The lower Gangetic people have always resented any effort by Delhi to rule over them. We from BD, W Bengal and NE shall always remain the greatest nightmare to the imperialist dreams of Brahmonic banyas of Delhi.

WE?? WHO???

India has nothing to fear from BD defence spending.

It is solely for self-defence and BD has no designs on Indian territory.

That's obvious, BD can't afford to have that...not even in 2030....or 3020...

 

[UKBengali]

That's obvious, BD can't afford to have that...not even in 2030....or 3020...

India would have disintegrated well before 3020.

 

[Anubis]

Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nepal, sri-Lanka, gays, Hijra,terrorist, tigers, lions, dogs, cats, water, USA, mullahs,priest,their own skin color is all a threat to India. XD. Moron. Calm you tits mate.

 

[Centaur]

WE?? WHO???



That's obvious, BD can't afford to have that...not even in 2030....or 3020...

Be careful mate,we Bengali's broke your India in 1947; we were more advance than our west Pakistani brothers to create the land of purity Pakistan. Dhaka is the birth place of all India Muslim league.
So do not under estimate Bengali Muslims,you will regret.

 

[dray]

Be careful mate,we Bengali's broke your India in 1947; we were more advance than our west Pakistani brothers to create the land of purity Pakistan. Dhaka is the birth place of all India Muslim league.
So do not under estimate Bengali Muslims,you will regret.

A large section of Indians actually wanted the amputation of certain gangrenous parts, it was largely a mutually agreed decision. And given the condition of Islamic extremism around the world, they proved to be wise. For bangladesh, it is destined to become far more fundamentalist eventually.

 

[Hasan89]

One thing for sure, Bangladesh and Pakistan are no threat to India in world cup cricket

Bangladesh knocked India out of the 2007 Cricket World Cup and made a billion Indians cry.

 

[Kandari-Hushiyaar]

A large section of Indians actually wanted the amputation of certain gangrenous parts, it was largely a mutually agreed decision. And given the condition of Islamic extremism around the world, they proved to be wise. For bangladesh, it is destined to become far more fundamentalist eventually.

Just because a large section of Indians tried to get rid of a part of so called " gangrenous " part , another large section of Indians cant return to their ancestral lands. I would choose to stay in gangrenous ancestral land though over anything.

 

[bluesky]

A large section of Indians actually wanted the amputation of certain gangrenous parts, it was largely a mutually agreed decision. And given the condition of Islamic extremism around the world, they proved to be wise. For bangladesh, it is destined to become far more fundamentalist eventually.

Which history book did you study, little Indian boy? Do not please falsify history. Do not write history in a way that it is just a self-made story, please!!

 

[somebozo]

So now indian chief will come and say india is ready for three front war?

 

[bluesky]

So now indian chief will come and say india is ready for three front war?

Before 1971, the eastern part of Pakistan was weak without almost no military strength. But, today BD is quite strong and is becoming stronger every year since then. It has become a headache for the Indian military strategists. BA purchases no weapons from India, but purchases from Pakistan. It means that there are connections between the military of BD and Pakistan.

Let alone conducting a 3-front war by India, even a 2-front war in its east and west will not be easy to win by IA.

 

[Nilgiri]

So now indian chief will come and say india is ready for three front war?

BD doesnt count as a front. The dams will be opened and nature will take its course.

 

[dray]

Which history book did you study, little Indian boy? Do not please falsify history. Do not write history in a way that it is just a self-made story, please!!

Standard history books, not madrasa types..

Just because a large section of Indians tried to get rid of a part of so called " gangrenous " part , another large section of Indians cant return to their ancestral lands. I would choose to stay in gangrenous ancestral land though over anything.

They can't return to their ancestral land, and still being evicted from their ancestral land, because those parts were truly gangrenous. Those gangrenous parts were supposed to protect their minorities, but not expected to, and they proved to be extremely bigoted and hostile towards their minorities.

 

[BD_India_friend]

Oh now an indian will tell us what constitutes history and what doesn't. No one touches a savage smelly indian, not even with a stick. Won't even spit on your face

 

[Kandari-Hushiyaar]

Standard history books, not madrasa types..



They can't return to their ancestral land, and still being evicted from their ancestral land, because those parts were truly gangrenous. Those gangrenous parts were supposed to protect their minorities, but not expected to, and they proved to be extremely bigoted and hostile towards their minorities.

India should leave West bengal & Kasmir on this formulae too.

 

[BD_India_friend]

West Bengal is bad smelly rubbish we got rid of in '47. We don't want them back