An eye opening report from the proceedings in the SCP.
Please look at the behaviour of Attorney General of Pakistan and whose behest he was in the SCP, from the report it is clear he was not representing Government of PTI but some other department.
Look at the revelations in the context that opposition had 3 meetings with the Military Establishment and issued threats to them.
Why presenting the evidence of foreign involvement in this fiasco in the SCP was a problem, and for whom!!
Once you look at the whole scenario, everything would become clear, how and why this verdict is secured.
I have not listened to this podcast so please excuse me. I will make one post on the subject and will keep out of this debate as this is a subject of venting anger and not thinking properly.
A. The ruling. One must understand the stance of the Hon. SC in light of the law of the land.
1. The DEP speaker made a ruling based on a point of order that a foreign power is threatening the government of Pakistan.
a. No one could establish that he had seen the evidence for it beforehand. The minutes of the Nat. Sec committee meeting were there but he did not attend it. So in the morning he could not have reached a verdict based on reliable information.
b. More importantly, even if you accept that there is a threat, then what investigations were conducted to see how this was related to the No confidence movement tabled by the opposition?
c. Most importantly, if you were implying horse trading then could you prove implicitly that it had taken place? Where was the investigation and what money trail was being established from the source (ie the US)to the relevant actors of the NCV and the other lotas?
These 3 points needed to be established before one could say with reliable and honest intent that the Dep. Speaker's decision was sound. This could not be established by anyone.
B. THE RULINGS OF THE SPEAKER AND PARLIAENTARY PROCEEDINGS CANNOT BE CHALLANGED IN COURT.
The main defence was that the rulings of the deputy speaker could not be challanged in court. The difference between many previous rulings and this one was that if the rulings were procedural ie in relation to the day to day functioning of the parlianment, then they could not be challanged. If the ruling was against one person or some otherv matter then it would have been fine. This ruling was to overrule the rights of the majority by one man based on a premise which remains THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATED BASED ON THE 3 POINTS MENTIONED ABOVE. Since the latter did not happen the rules of the functioning of the parlianment were toyed with by one man who issued a ruling contrary to the norms and ethics of the parlianment and therefore the SC held it void.
If the ruling was void then tye SC has merely turned back the clock to pre NCV and oedered that the NCV be tabled on Saturday.
I have no love lost for SS, Zardari/Billo Rani or Fazlu. To me personally they are the scum of the earth and dirty as hell. I fully believe that their NCV has been financed by the relevant force with a specific anti Pakistani agenda. However, my belief aside when you approach the SC you need to have IRREFUTABLE PROOF of this to have taken place. The lawyers could not have and therefore did not prove this to have happened. This is the crux of the matter.
Now I will leave you to continue to vent your Liver.
I also think these basrards cannot run the state in its current form with IK sat in the opposition. Their own mistrust will lead to fractioning soon. We will have elections if not in 3 months then 6-12 months. IK will be stronger and hopefully wiser than the last time having been stung badly on this account. On the street no one can counter PTI so it will come back stronger. Allah moves in mysterious ways and His machinations are unrivalled by all. Let us put our faith in HIM izzaWaJal to guide this country back to its path .
A
PS:- I am not a lawyer so happy to be corrected by anyone with a better understanding of the Law.
A
