If the bench carries out impartial and independent "inquiry", it will ask the FIA or NAB to write letters to relevant authorities in UK for attested documentary evidences. In that case, there is a 100% chance of NS disqualification, not just because of money laundering, but because of articles 62 and 63.
From an inquiry standpoint, PTI has provided sufficient proofs to the court to let them start the investigation and trial. This is what PTI had to do and it has already done its task.
Uk govt will as policy refuse to provide that evidence.. what have uk done against altaf hussain so far??
Supreme court can decide on discripancies in ns and family statements and on fact that their are enough suspiscion of money laundering and tax evasion. They may ask om to step down and face a formal case