What system do you think is best?

[faisal6309]

These five systems are used in world today. All these have their positive and negative sides. Just vote and tell what system do you think is best.

 

[he-man]

There is one true system that gives power to common people like me

Its democracy.

Worst will be sharia/communism

 

[blood]

democracy , because slow and steady wins the race

the worst should be sharia

 

[MAB]

Looks like someone voted for sharia, I suppose there are a few personalities on PDF who I suspect would have voted for it.

 

[Arya Desa]

Communal facism.

 

[faisal6309]

I like economic system in communism and political system in democracy. Hence, democratic socialism.

 

[RescueRanger]

Technocracy.

 

[jammersat]

Some form of socialism , where as you lead a happy hassleless life

 

[TankMan]

Democratic Socialism.

Sharia would've been great before globalization etc but in the modern world, its unfortunately become too controversial to implement. Sectarianism is the biggest reason why Sharia is not a viable option since many sects will disagree if a certain form of Sharia is implemented. Then we'll have the problem of pressure from the international community.

If it wasn't for all this, Sharia and Khilafat would make a very good system.

Problem with Democracy+Capitalism is that ,aside from the fact that the majority is not always right, politicians have their own businesses and economic interests, so they'll try to make their own company/corporation etc be ahead and profit (Like the PMLN government in Pakistan). either that or we'll have some leader who is funded by huge corporations and controlled by them.

Democratic Socialism, in theory atleast, ensures that leaders will be under the public. It removes the problem of dictators in socialism while keeping the good parts of it. Though it is still possible for a democratically elected Socialist leader to take over, that risk is in every system.

 

[faisal6309]

Democratic Socialism.

Sharia would've been great before globalization etc but in the modern world, its unfortunately become too controversial to implement. Sectarianism is the biggest reason why Sharia is not a viable option since many sects will disagree if a certain form of Sharia is implemented. Then we'll have the problem of pressure from the international community.

If it wasn't for all this, Sharia and Khilafat would make a very good system.

Problem with Democracy+Capitalism is that ,aside from the fact that the majority is not always right, politicians have their own businesses and economic interests, so they'll try to make their own company/corporation etc be ahead and profit (Like the PMLN government in Pakistan). either that or we'll have some leader who is funded by huge corporations and controlled by them.

Democratic Socialism, in theory atleast, ensures that leaders will be under the public. It removes the problem of dictators in socialism while keeping the good parts of it. Though it is still possible for a democratically elected Socialist leader to take over, that risk is in every system.

No system is better. Every one of them has its cons and pros. Democracy gives you option to chose leader. But capitalist system is not good. Your example of PMLN is 100% right.

The same reason of you why I choose democratic socialism.

Sharia is not an option now. Shria is very old system. Democracy is even older than Shria but it was updated and things were added time to time.