What's new

What Syria Means for Egypt: Pro-Assad Mood Marks Return of Arab Nationalism

Rostam

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2012
Messages
497
Reaction score
0
What Syria Means for Egypt: Pro-Assad Mood Marks Return of Arab Nationalism


TIME World

As the Arab League convened in downtown Cairo on Sunday to discuss the crisis in Syria, several blocks away some 200 demonstrators assembled to denounce possible U.S. military action against Damascus.

1500_int_egypt_0902.jpg


In the late afternoon glow, two demonstrators held a large plastic banner picturing former Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser alongside the red, white and black flag of the Syrian government run by embattled President Bashar Assad. Some spoke of their support for Syrian government forces against a U.S. attack. Others chanted to a drumbeat, “Syria and Egypt are one hand!” Though tiny by Egyptian standards, the protest also attracted dozens of television cameras, photographers and newspaper reporters. And it wasn’t long before a scuffle broke out on the edge of the crowd, where a small group opposed to Assad appeared.

“I want them to say they’re against Assad!” shouted Ahmad Muhammad Said, 30, an anti-Assad protester who works in a computer company. He said he lived in Syria until May 2011, after Assad’s regime launched a brutal crackdown on a pro-democracy uprising, sparking a civil war that has killed tens of thousands. “I’m Egyptian,” he said, flashing his identification card. “I know what happened in Syria.” A protest organizer, wearing a T-shirt from the Nasserist Popular Current coalition, took him by both arms and led him back a few meters from the crowd.

The prospect of U.S. strikes against Syria is further stoking a surge of militaristic nationalism that has gripped a large portion of Egyptian society since the armed forces removed Muslim Brotherhood–affiliated President Mohamed Morsi from power on July 3 following huge protests. Morsi, who owed his presidency to the wave of Arab uprisings that began in 2011, enthusiastically supported the Syrian opposition and called for international intervention in the crisis.

Since taking power, the military-backed government that supplanted Morsi has changed Egypt’s official stance with regard to Syria, sternly rejecting military intervention and arguing against international action at the Arab League. Inside Egypt, riding high on public support, the military rulers have pursued a forceful clampdown on the Brotherhood under the slogan of “fighting terrorism,” killing more than 1,000 people and jailing at least 1,000 others. Morsi himself is in custody, and on Sunday he was referred to trial on charges of inciting the murder of protesters during demonstrations outside the presidential palace last December.

Last week, with the U.S. edging closer to an attack on Syria, nationalist rhetoric inside Egypt reached an even higher pitch. Hamdeen Sabahi, the leader of the Popular Current who came in third in last year’s presidential election, told a television interviewer, “If Egypt is going to be attacked, it will come from the north, from Syria. An attack on Syria is an attack on Egypt.”

The youthful activists who launched the campaign to unseat Morsi joined in the posturing. Mahmoud Badr, the spokesman for the Tamarod (Rebellion) Campaign, released a statement calling on Egypt to close the Suez Canal to warships involved in a potential strike on Syria, saying he “supported the Syrian Arab army in the face of the upcoming U.S. military strike against Syria.” Anyone who supported foreign intervention, he said, is a “traitor.” The group’s Facebook page is emblazoned with an image of an American flag in flames.

Sabahi, the protesters in downtown Cairo and some of Tamarod’s founders have something in common: their nationalism is infused with nostalgia for Nasser, who as a charismatic young army lieutenant colonel led the Free Officers in deposing Egypt’s British-backed monarchy in 1952. As President, he transformed the Egyptian state and brought Egypt into a short-lived union with Syria (a fact to which Sabahi explicitly referred last week). Though distinct from the Assad family’s Baathism (another variant of Arab nationalism), Nasserism is a current that still runs deep in Egyptian politics and has made something of a comeback in recent months. Some have drawn a direct comparison between Nasser and General Abdul Fattah al-Sisi, the 58-year-old army chief who, despite reportedly enjoying a good relationship with Morsi early in his term, carried out the July 3 coup against him. At Sunday’s demonstration against intervention in Syria, protesters held posters depicting al-Sisi and Nasser side by side.

Seeing more of Nasser’s portraits hanging from buildings in Cairo and hearing his name mentioned in the same breath as al-Sisi’s also casts a new light on the political crosscurrents that led to Morsi’s ouster. Standing among the crowd at Sunday’s demonstration was Mohamed Haikal, one of the five founders of Tamarod. By his reckoning, the impetus for the anti-Morsi campaign came not in May 2013 but in June 2012, when in a speech in Tahrir Square, the newly elected Morsi referred to the “long oppression” suffered by Egyptians in the several decades leading up to the 2011 revolution. “He said a sentence about the time of the ’60s, which was the years of Nasser,” Haikal said in an interview a week earlier. “We felt that we have been humiliated by the new President, that he is against our beloved leader and icon, Nasser.”

Others are wary of the apparent Nasserist revival. Though he was loved for his populist reforms and for the national pride he instilled in his people, many Egyptians have deeply conflicted memories of Nasser, who also set in motion many of the authoritarian practices that remain the foundations of the Egyptian state. Like the current government, Nasser’s regime also violently suppressed political opposition, including the Brotherhood (particularly following a failed 1954 assassination attempt by a Muslim Brother against him).

Nasserist rhetoric was notably absent in the months after the 2011 uprising that deposed dictator Hosni Mubarak, according to Khaled Fahmy, chair of the history department at the American University in Cairo. The Jan. 25 revolution was, he argues, a rejection of Nasser’s formula of stability and economic security at the expense of political rights. That changed last year during protests against Morsi’s centralization of power, when Nasser’s portrait started appearing more frequently in demonstrations. “It is the fear of the Brotherhood. It is also the fear of a breakdown of law and order,” Fahmy says. “It’s in a sense, revolution fatigue.”

“The revolution broke out specifically against that formula: either stability or freedom,” says Fahmy. “We wanted both stability and freedom. We knew that freedom effectively would mean asking important questions about the military, a military that has been enshrined in Egyptian politics because of Nasser, a military that has been given this impunity because of Nasser. So in the end, to ask for Nasser to come back, effectively, is a setback for the revolution.”

In Egypt, Pro-Assad Mood Marks Return of Arab Nationalism | TIME.com
 
Egypt Rejects US Strike on Syria

Al-Monitor

1-RTX1346P.jpg

Arab foreign ministers attend an emergency meeting to discuss the Syrian crisis and the potential military strike on President Bashar al-Assad's regime, at the Arab League headquarters in Cairo, Sept. 1, 2013. (photo by REUTERS/Amr Abdallah Dalsh)

Egypt’s rejection of a military intervention in Syria runs counter to the positions of the Gulf countries, especially Saudi Arabia, toward the Syrian issue. Many observers have wondered why the transitional authorities in Egypt are going against the Gulf countries’ Syria policy, despite the tremendous support that Egypt has been receiving from Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait since the ouster of President Mohammed Morsi and the fall of the Muslim Brotherhood in early July.

While the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, Gen. Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, and Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal were holding talks with Egyptian officials on regional developments, and while the Arab foreign ministers were discussing the latest developments in the Syrian crisis in light of the US threats, Egyptian Foreign Minister Nabil Fahmy issued a clear official statement that Egypt rejects a military strike. That happened a few hours after Al-Azhar announced its “categorical rejection and condemnation” of President Barack Obama’s decision to strike Syria.

Despite the Gulf countries’ support, which has not stopped since Morsi was ousted on July 3, the Egyptian-Saudi attitude toward the Syrian crisis was not unified. The Saudi foreign minister demanded that the international community use all its capabilities to intervene against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, contrary to his Egyptian counterpart’s remarks. Unlike Egypt, the UAE has not yet taken a clear position toward a military strike.

The Gulf gives Egypt massive financial support that is valued at more than $12 billion. It comes in multiple forms, including treasury bonds and oil products.

This Gulf aid is directly helping Egyptian citizens, because it has contributed to the disappearance of long lines at gas stations. In the days leading up to June 30, when the Egyptians toppled Morsi, the country was in crisis because of gasoline and diesel shortages. It seems that the Gulf aid will continue despite the Egyptian-Gulf disagreement over the Syrian issue.

“The UAE, both its leadership and people, will continue to be a strong supporter of Egypt and its brotherly people.” That’s how the meeting of Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, interim Egyptian President Adly Mansour, Prime Minister Hazem el-Beblawi and Defense Minister Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Sisi can be summarized.

For his part, Prince Saud al-Faisal said during a joint news conference with his Egyptian counterpart that the kingdom “will continue to support Egypt politically and economically during the current period and the next because of the close and historic relationship between the two brotherly peoples and because of the shared interests between Egypt and Saudi Arabia. … The Western countries’ threats to cut off aid to Egypt will not be implemented and are just threats, because the interests are mutual.” He described Egypt as “a big country. … Cutting off aid [to Egypt] is not in [the Western countries’] interest.”

A few days ago, after talks with EU officials, Faisal confirmed that Riyadh “will support Egypt financially if sanctions are imposed on it.” Some have raised the possibility of imposing sanctions on Egypt because of the violence that followed Morsi’s ouster.

Mohammed Said Idris, an expert at the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, said in an interview with As-Safir, “The different positions of Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE regarding the Syrian crisis will not affect the Gulf’s material support to Egypt, because there are relations between Egypt and the Gulf and these relations force the latter to maintain its financial support. … [The Gulf’s financial] support is partly to help Egypt continue to eliminate the Muslim Brotherhood’s project and put an end to the horror experienced by the Gulf, amid concerns that the [Brotherhood] may extend their control over the Arab countries. … Things have significantly changed after the Jan. 25 and June 30 revolutions.” He pointed out that Egypt has officially announced its opposition to a US intervention in Syria, despite the Unites States’ $1.3 billion annual military aid and $250 million in economic aid to Egypt.

Political researcher Ammar Ali Hassan considers the Gulf’s support to have clear messages, most notably emphasizing Arab support for Egypt and resisting any external interference in Egyptian affairs, because if the West successfully intervenes in Syria — as the Muslim Brotherhood wants — the shape of the Arab region will change for many years.

Ali Hassan said the position toward Syria is different for each country and Egypt rejects US intervention, because otherwise Egypt would be obliged to participate in the military strike, something that the Egyptian army cannot withstand. Moreover, Egypt's participating in a strike against Syria is incongruent with Egypt’s current political conditions.


Egypt Rejects US Strike on Syria - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East
 
Back
Top Bottom