What is the best outcome of SinoPak-Indian war?

[Hellfire]

it's funny how Indian can somehow equate full enslavement of the entire country of India by whites, muslims and mongols as the same to China being defeated in few wars and lost its subjugates. Let me lay this out for you, yes, Chinese lost wars and lost its subjugate outer mongolia, but then china also subjugated Xinjinang and Tibet, but Russia never had presence and administered China like whites, mongols and muslims administered India. So yes, Whites, Muslims and Mongols enslaved entire country of India and had full administrative power over the Indian. China for the most part of the history was ruled by Han rulers and had only 2 foreign dynasties, Yuan (mongol) and Qing (Manchu). Also yes, china lost wars to British and Russia, but those countries never had full administrative power over China, British only had city of Hong Kong, Russia only forced split of outer Mongolia. China also held much ground against Japan and Japan only had 1/3 of China at its height, when Japan surrendered in 1945, China-Japan was still at war. So there's simply no comparison between China and India, as the entire country of India was fully enslaved and managed by whites, muslims and mongols continuously for thousands of year. Equating China to India is simply ludicrous.

I mean heights of delusive ideation .....


Yup ... no powers .. Treaty of Nanking never occurred

I am wasting my time with the village dunce ..

 

[Sine Nomine]

India wanted to, but was not in a position. As you have rightly said above (the bold portion), thanks to US' deft manoeuvres ....


Not as you claimed because your army was ready in west


US felt that they had 72 hours after fall of Dhaka to be able to stop the war as that much time was needed for Indian forces to move from East to reinforce offensive operations in West ... again cited in the references already provided.

Come up with a better story mate,even today you do have logistics capabilities to mobilize your forces against Pakistan in 72 hours,let alone in 71.

Cold start failed to materialize due to massive hurdles in logistics,And you are trying to tell us 45 years ago,you were able to do that,but today aren't.

 

[HariPrasad]

that's what happens when a vastly inferior army starting to hallucinate. Even without Pakistan, China can easily crush Indian army like crushing a little bug. Comparing Indian army with China is like comparing 5 years old kid with toy gun against cannon carrying adult. Indian army is inferior to the chinese by at least a decade on every single level. A full out war with china spells the end of India as we know today, and pretty much entire northern Indian will be incorporated into China and Pakistan and Bangladesh, and rest of India will be given to Sri Lanka as gift. By then, the world will finally rid of the most heinous and largest slavery country in the world, Kashimir, Northeast India, Sikkim, Nepal, Bhutan, south Tibet will finally get the freedom they craved for so long.

What happened to your mighty type 52 d warship whose engine had failed in Indian ocean and your best in the world engineers were unable to fix the problems for 2 weeks? Is it rescued?

 

[Hellfire]

Come up with a better story mate,even today you do have logistics capabilities to mobilize your forces against Pakistan in 72 hours,let alone in 71.

Cold start failed to materialize due to massive hurdles in logistics,And you are trying to tell us 45 years ago,you were able to do that,but today aren't.

Read White House Years - Henry Kissinger Chapter 21

I am giving you the references, you have to make the effort to read.

One can give water to the horse, can not make it drink!

And for the rest:

Good for you .. I am glad there are massive logistic problems on Indian side as per you.

Are you sure I do not have the background to know what I speak of?

 

[master_13]

I mean heights of delusive ideation .....


Yup ... no powers .. Treaty of Nanking never occurred

I am wasting my time with the village dunce ..

are you dumb? didn't I say china lost war to the British but only gave Hong Kong as a colony in the treaty? and you equate that to British didn't even bother signing any treaties with the Indian and simply barge in and took entire India?

 

[Hellfire]

are you dumb? didn't I say china lost war to the British but only gave Hong Kong as a colony in the treaty? and you equate that to British didn't even bother signing any treaties with the Indian and simply barge in and took entire India?

That is where you are dumb .. and showing your ignorance.

Not once have you put up references to back up your claim.

Put them up

 

[master_13]

That is where you are dumb .. and showing your ignorance.

Not once have you put up references to back up your claim.

Put them up

yet, you are making false comparison by bringing up Nanking treaty, what legitimate references have you brought in to back you claim? That's right, none.

 

[52051]

Let's wait and see but currently world is witnessing a hopeless China which can not do anything except issuing warnings. If it is a war, we will humiliate China and reduce them to Mon entity.

Yes, the world just wait and see a repeat of events of 1962, when indians dance up and down like monkeys for a few months until the tiger decided to punch them for a little fun, its really comedic

For an country with an average IQ barely comparable to africans, I can expect your optimisim about your shithole country, thats the exact reason why the indians are merely indians.

 

[dray]

Yes, the world just wait and see a repeat of events of 1962, when indians dance up and down like monkeys for a few months until the tiger decided to punch them for a little fun, its really comedic

For an country with an average IQ barely comparable to africans, I can expect your optimisim about your shithole country, thats the exact reason why the indians are merely indians.

Dumb chinis with fudged IQ are like yeah yeah we attack now...then we attack in days...then weeks.....and now we attack in months! Meanwhile Mr Ping Ping lost his marbles, his ching chong army wetting their pants in Doklam, and chini foreign ministry taking notes from our NSA......that's what happens when petty thieves get caught red-handed and about to get a public thrashing.

For all its claims of being a peaceful responsible country and a rising power; China is nothing but a glorified thug.

 

[UKBengali]

For an country with an average IQ barely comparable to africans, I can expect your optimisim about your shithole country, thats the exact reason why the indians are merely indians.

The IQ of Indians and S Asians in general is comparable to whites and E Asians, when you take out environmental factors. You can see this by looking at the UK where there is a level playing field between whites and S Asians, and they are really no better than each other in education. India is behind China lies more to do with the fact that it is a multi-ethnic rather than a unitary state like China.

On topic: China is vastly more powerful than India and will easily win against India should a war occur.

 

[BetterPakistan]

When you quote me .. better have your facts ready.

The post you have quoted of mine .... reference for it is White House Years - Henry Kissinger.


Here:

“Our fleet passed through the Strait of Malacca into the Bay of Bengal and attracted much media attention. Were we threatening India? Were we seeking to defend East Pakistan? Had we lost our minds? It was in fact sober calculation. We had some seventy-two hours to bring the war to a conclusion before West Pakistan would be swept into the maelstrom. It would take India that long to shift its forces and mount an assault. Once Pakistan’s army and air force were destroyed, its impotence would guarantee the country’s eventual disintegration. We had to give the Soviets a warning that matters might get out of control on our side too. We had to be ready to back up the Chinese if at the last moment they came in after all, our UN initiative having failed. The Kremlin needed an excuse to accelerate the pressures it claimed it was exerting on India. However unlikely an American military move against India, the other side could not be sure; it might not be willing to accept even the minor risk that we might act irrationally. It was also the best means to split the Soviet Union and India. Moscow was prepared to harass us; it was in our judgment not prepared to run military risks. Moving the carrier task force into the Bay of Bengal committed us to no final act, but it created precisely the margin of uncertainty needed to force a decision by New Delhi and Moscow.”

Excerpt From: Henry Kissinger. “White House Years.” Chapter 21 The Tilt:The India-Pakistan Crisis of 1971

Does the name ring a bell? Yes?

I didn't claim anything ... merely stated facts. Now go play ... old man

Surprisingly, you are the kiddo here .. check dates of membership



Yup .. see another one comes out with rhetoric bereft of facts .. sigh!! They are growing in numbers here ....

My kiddo, I was told that you are a 15 year old kid and you have proved it now. You claimed a very big thing back in your comments and when I asked you how than you started trolling. Kiddo go & study your school books you don't need to be here