Really? How exactly?Houthis can't never capture and reverse engineering patriots batteries.
Russia can.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? How exactly?Houthis can't never capture and reverse engineering patriots batteries.
Russia can.
Really? How exactly?
The most useful thing of reverse engineering something is find bugs to take over the thing remotely, it's not copy it.Russia has S-350 missile which is far more advanced and capable than Patriot. They may study it, but won't reverse engineer it.
S-350 missile system - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The most useful thing of reverse engineering something is find bugs to take over the thing remotely, it's not copy it.
Then the Russians shouldn't be worry about the Patriots. Calling it an escalation and so on.Russia reverse engineered a bunch of American chips in the 80s. They have the know how.
TMS320 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Intel MCS-96 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Then the Russians shouldn't be worry about the Patriots. Calling it an escalation and so on.
No, the Russians are lucky.Any military hardware is escalation. Americans are lucky Russians didn't break diplomatic relation.
No, the Russians are lucky.
Ok sure. Glad we know the Russians won't break relations after sending in HIMARS to Patriots to whatever is being providing in the future.Americans need to import aluminum from Russia. Without that American prices would be too high. Americans cannot afford to break diplomatic relation with Russia.
Ok sure. Glad we know the Russians won't break relations after sending in HIMARS to Patriots to whatever is being providing in the future.
The most basic and short range version of HIMARS proved much more effective (and accurate) then all the systems you mentioned combined.Don't push your luck. HIMARS is just a kid compared to Tornado-S. 227 mm vs 300 mm. 70 km range vs 120 km range. And I'm not even mentioning Iskander and Geran.
The most basic and short range version of HIMARS proved much more effective (and accurate) then all the systems you mentioned combined.
Not to mention Russians have not menaged to destroy a single one yet.
Difference is that Ukrainians were not bragging they will destroy Tornado(which is by the way far,far behind HIMARS in accuracy) but Russians were more then vocal about intending to destroy HIMARS.Let alone destroying a Patriot.Same can be said of Ukrainians. They don't have anything that has enough range to target say a Tornado-S.
Difference is that Ukrainians were not bragging they will destroy Tornado(which is by the way far,far behind HIMARS in accuracy) but Russians were more then vocal about intending to destroy HIMARS.Let alone destroying a Patriot.
Right.That is why even Iran is copiying HIMARS(Fath 360) istead of buying Russian tech.Accuracy is the same. GLONASS is not less accurate than GPS.