Crypto
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2010
- Messages
- 1,482
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Liar. There was democracy in Iran and Guatemala until US initiated coups replaced them with authoritarian regimes. Case with Pakistan was no better. US supported Ayub, Zia and Musharraf for its own foreign agendas. Where was support for democracy back then?That is correct, USA will deal with anybody in power in Pakistan, but it also would like to see democracy flourish as much as is possible.
LOL. So why your cunning state department support dictatorship in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt but not in Iran, China and North Korea?Simple answer: Democracy is dangerous, but dictatorships are far more dangerous for Pakistan. It's all relative.
ofcourse not, same rule applies on Pakistan..
now back to the country who adopted you? does this rule apply on amarica?
Liar. There was democracy in Iran and Guatemala until US initiated coups replaced them with authoritarian regimes. Case with Pakistan was no better. US supported Ayub, Zia and Musharraf for its own foreign agendas. Where was support for democracy back then?
LOL. So why your cunning state department support dictatorship in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt but not in Iran, China and North Korea?
USA follows this "rule" just as well as Pakistan does.
simple question, is it legal for USA and Pakistan to do this meddling?
What meddling? USA is only offering friendly advice to an important country, that is all.
friendly advice in internal matters, do you think its legal?
Please quote me the law that says it is illegal?
international law is not a written document, its a convention that one doesnt poke nose in another country's internal affairs... and that is why diplomats are called in by FO for explanations, let me rephrase it for you, is it morally right for USA to poke its nose in Pakistan's internal affairs?
So there is no law you can quote?
So let me know when the Pakistani FO summons the US Ambassador to protest anything unsuitable or immoral that may have been said. Until then, everything is fine.
you mean to say its perfectly alright even if no such objection is raised?
Of course it is alright if there is no formal objection. Silence is acquiescence in this case.
Now, having said that, if it is your personal opinion that it is not okay, then you have the right to say so. Others may or may not agree, but that is their right too.
do you personally think that is alright for countries to meddle in internal affairs of another country, do you think America is at wrong here?