What's new

We thank Amereeka for their support to us. Saad Rafique

Leader

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
29,159
Reaction score
9
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
BxKZ5dECUAA0Dd5.jpg


meddling of foreign country in our internal affairs is welcomed by this MP of Nawaz group..
 
. .
very immature of him, i know their Govt is here to stay but they should know the USA supports no one, if IK comes to power, they will deal with him also, if Raheel comes to power they will deal with him, their policy for Pakistan will remain same.

i liked this guy :(
 
. .
very immature of him, i know their Govt is here to stay but they should know the USA supports no one, if IK comes to power, they will deal with him also, if Raheel comes to power they will deal with him, their policy for Pakistan will remain same.

i liked this guy :(

That is correct, USA will deal with anybody in power in Pakistan, but it also would like to see democracy flourish as much as is possible.
 
.
Only a pithu like him and a leader like Nawaz can be thankful to another country for meddling in their internal affairs. Waisa itna begarat to Zardari be nahi tha. They have crossed all limits yet people fail to see for what they are.
 
.
Only a pithu like him and a leader like Nawaz can be thankful to another country for meddling in their internal affairs. Waisa itna begarat to Zardari be nahi tha. They have crossed all limits yet people fail to see for what they are.

Does anybody remember what the Saudi Minister did during his press conference in IBD not that long ago? Was that only "brotherly advice"? :D
 
. . .
Does anybody remember what the Saudi Minister did during his press conference in IBD not that long ago? Was that only "brotherly advice"? :D

is that a justification for illegal act by the country who adopted you? (Slow Clap)
 
.
That is correct, USA will deal with anybody in power in Pakistan, but it also would like to see democracy flourish as much as is possible.
why is democracy dangerous for Pakistan? dude btw i remembered something, Ehsan Iqbal is always giving the example of the Time when Korea and Malaysia looked up to us, so wasnt that the rule of Ayub Khan, a dictator? so how can they give that example in a democracy LOL
 
.
why is democracy dangerous for Pakistan? dude btw i remembered something, Ehsan Iqbal is always giving the example of the Time when Korea and Malaysia looked up to us, so wasnt that the rule of Ayub Khan, a dictator? so how can they give that example in a democracy LOL

Simple answer: Democracy is dangerous, but dictatorships are far more dangerous for Pakistan. It's all relative.

is that a justification for illegal act by the country who adopted you? (Slow Clap)

Why pick and choose who can interfere in the internal affairs of Pakistan, when it is an open door for just about anybody? :D
 
.
Simple answer: Democracy is dangerous, but dictatorships are far more dangerous for Pakistan. It's all relative.



Why pick and choose who can interfere in the internal affairs of Pakistan, when it is an open door for just about anybody? :D

again no answer on the legal point of view, as you like to brag about where you feel advantaged in an argument... but hey unlike your kind Im up for law, and say it unequivocally that its shameful for any country to influence/interfere/dictate any of Pakistan's internal matters, be it Saudis, Americans, Chineese or whatever country, and a man of integrity will call something wrong a wrong at any given day, thanks to Allah my teacher being Sir Imran Khan.. :pakistan:
 
.
again no answer on the legal point of view, as you like to brag about where you feel advantaged in an argument... but hey unlike your kind Im up for law, and say it unequivocally that its shameful for any country to influence/interfere/dictate any of Pakistan's internal matters, be it Saudis, Americans, Chineese or whatever country, and a man of integrity will call something wrong a wrong at any given day, thanks to Allah my teacher being Sir Imran Khan..

So does it work the other way too? Is Pakistan entitled to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, for example, a neighbor or two? Or is it that your allocation of shame is reserved only for others when it is more richly deserved at home?

International geopolitics is a multi-player game.
 
.
So does it work the other way too? Is Pakistan entitled to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, for example, a neighbor or two? Or is it that your allocation of shame is reserved only for others when it is more richly deserved at home?

International geopolitics is a multi-player game.

ofcourse not, same rule applies on Pakistan..

now back to the country who adopted you? does this rule apply on amarica?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom