What's new

Water dispute fuels India-Pakistan tensions

Machoman

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
1,521
Reaction score
0



GUJRAT: A bitter dispute over limited water resources is fueling India-Pakistan tensions at a time when the South Asian neighbors are trying to rebuild trust and resume peace talks.

It's a long-running feud that has worsened in recent months as a dry spell focuses attention on Pakistan's growing water shortage. Three days of talks in March ended with both sides trading barbs and failing to reach a resolution.

The issue was raised Thursday when the leaders of the two countries met at a regional summit in Bhutan and agreed on the need to normalize relations, the Pakistani side said.

Further complicating the situation, extremists are trying to capitalize on allegations that India is stealing water from glacier-fed rivers that start in the disputed territory of Kashmir.

Independent experts say there is no evidence to support those charges, but they warn that Pakistani concerns about India's plans to build at least 15 new dams need to be addressed to avoid conflict.

''If you want to give Lashkar-e-Taiba and other Pakistani militants an issue that really rallies people, give them water,'' said John Briscoe, who has worked on water issues in the two countries for 35 years and was the World Bank's senior water adviser.

Farmers in Pakistan's central breadbasket are certainly angry.

''India has blocked our water because they are our enemy,'' said Mohammad, a 65-year-old farmer in the town of Gujrat who goes by only one name.

His farm sits a few miles (kilometers) from the Chenab River, which residents say has been shrinking since India completed a hydroelectric dam in its part of Kashmir in 2008. In some sections, water flows in only a tenth of the river bed, and nearby irrigation canals have dried up.

Indian officials blame any reduction on natural variation and climate change, which have hurt India as well. They add that Pakistan's antiquated irrigation system wastes large quantities of water.

''Preposterous and completely unwarranted allegations of stealing water and waging a water war are being made against India,'' the Indian ambassador to Pakistan, Sharat Sabharwal, said in a speech in April.

The animosity over water could make it more difficult to resolve the signature dispute between the two countries: the decades-long struggle over Kashmir.

The United States has been seeking to reduce India-Pakistan tensions, hoping that would free Pakistan to move troops away from the Indian front to fight militants attacking US and Nato troops in Afghanistan from sanctuaries near the Afghan border.

''The issues of Kashmir and terrorism are going to be much more difficult if we don't have an agreement on water,'' said water expert Briscoe, now a professor at the Harvard School of Public Health.

The origin of the water dispute can be traced to the creation of Pakistan and India in 1947, when the British Indian empire was partitioned. The split gave India control of the part of Kashmir that is the source of six rivers that irrigate crops in Pakistan's agricultural heartland of Punjab province and elsewhere.

Under a 1960 agreement, Pakistan has the use of the three western rivers _ the Indus, Jhelum and Chenab _ and India, the three eastern ones _ the Sutlej, Beas and Ravi.

India was granted limited use of Pakistan's rivers for agricultural purposes, plus the right to build hydroelectric dams, as long as they don't store or divert large amounts of water.

Pakistan is one of the driest countries in the world, and water availability per person has fallen from about 5,000 cubic meters (175,000 cubic feet) in 1947 to around 1,000 cubic meters (35,000 cubic feet) today. Most of the drop is a result of rapid population growth, but recent shortages have heightened suspicion about India.

Pakistan's Indus water commissioner, Jamat Ali Shah, doesn't accuse India of stealing water, but he says India isn't providing information required under the 1960 pact to prove that it's not.

''There should be nothing in the track record that shows India has violated the treaty,'' said Shah. ''But it is a fact that the track record is not clear.''

India denies any intention to cut off water to Pakistan and maintains that it has complied with the treaty. But as with other issues between the two countries, mistrust runs high.

''If he has the capacity to hurt me, the best that can be said about him is that he will use it for blackmailing and the worst is that he will use it to harm me,'' said Shams ul Mulk, the former head of Pakistan's Ministry of Water and Power.
 
I think if Indian not going to work on that with Pakistan the war is a must!
 
No point talking about it.
From number of discussion we had here, it was concluded that Pakistan is spreading false information, this can be evident from the fact that they do not complain to tribunal and ask for arbitration.
 
Pakistan have lot of other issues to talk about why they will spreading this kind a news you guys better check your end this time.
 
Few of the experts from the article that is posted.....


Independent experts say there is no evidence to support those charges, but they warn that Pakistani concerns about India's plans to build at least 15 new dams need to be addressed to avoid conflict.


India was granted limited use of Pakistan's rivers for agricultural purposes, plus the right to build hydroelectric dams, as long as they don't store or divert large amounts of water.
Pakistan's Indus water commissioner, Jamat Ali Shah, doesn't accuse India of stealing water, but he says India isn't providing information required under the 1960 pact to prove that it's not.

India denies any intention to cut off water to Pakistan and maintains that it has complied with the treaty. But as with other issues between the two countries, mistrust runs high

As Indian Rabbit mentioned this has been discussed many times so no point in discussing the same thing...From the above experts it is clear that

- Independent experts do not find any issues
- Pakistan authorities are themselves not convinced about the stealing part
- Proposed Damn by India are perfectally legal as per treaty as long as they don't store or divert large amounts of water....


In the end many members have raised point that if you folks are so convinced that india is stealing water then why the heck you are not complaining in international forum??? India is signatory to the treaty and cannot just ignore world bank who funded it...
 
Qureshi denies India stealing Pakistan''s water - GEO.tv

Qureshi denies India stealing Pakistan's water Qureshi


Updated at: 2007 PST, Friday, April 30, 2010

ISLAMABAD: Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi on Friday described the outcome of the latest Indo-Pak talks as more than expected and a step in the right direction, and said efforts will be made to build on it to bridge the trust deficit between the two countries.

Responding to a question, he said, India was not stealing Pakistan's share of water and it is being wasted due to mismanagement.

A day after Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani met his Indian counterpart Manmohan Singh in Bhutan and broke the ice, Qureshi said he intends to establish contact with External Affairs Minister S M Krishna as soon as the Indian Parliament's budgetary session concludes on May 7.

He said there was no need to accord any nomenclature like 'composite dialogue' to the talks that would be held shortly, but the intent is to discuss all outstanding issues like Kashmir, Siachen, Sir Creek and water sharing.

"If all issues are to be discussed, whether you call it comprehensive dialogue, composite dialogue or whatever you want, that is not important. The spirit behind that is important, the spirit is right," he said at a press conference here.

Referring to the meeting between Singh and Gilani, Qureshi said the outcome has been "more than expected... it is a step in the right direction, a concrete development and we will build on it".

He pointed out that there has been a trust deficit between India and Pakistan and "we have to bridge it through confidence-building measures".

Acknowledging that the trust deficit cannot be bridged overnight, Qureshi said: "we have to be realistic and pragmatic. It will not happen in a day, it is a process. If we allow the process to continue, obviously with passage of time, the deficit will be narrowed down".

The two Foreign Ministers have been entrusted with the task of reducing the trust deficit, he said.

Responding to a question, he said he could find many faults in India's approach and vice versa but the two sides needed to prevent further deterioration in ties.
 
^^^
Since the Cat is out of the bag, we can now focus on the "real" issues.
:cheers:
 

Back
Top Bottom