What's new

Warlords still rule Afghanistan

Bratva

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
13,832
Reaction score
67
Country
Pakistan
Location
Qatar
Warlords still rule Afghanistan
By Tahir Khan
Published: July 4, 2015
47SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
914452-afghantaliban-1435994950-486-640x480.gif

US raid on arms depot raises concerns about other hidden caches.

914452-afghantaliban-1435994950-486-160x120.gif
914452-tali-1435970466-635-160x120.jpg

ISLAMABAD: A US raid this week on an illegal weapons cache allegedly belonging to former jihadi leader Jan Mohammad – a close ally of Afghan Chief Executive Dr Abdullah Abdullah – has exposed the dangerous presence of warlords in the conflict-ridden country.

Since American fighter jets blew up the arms depot at Charikar, the capital of Parwan province on June 29, Afghans have been seeking an explanation as to why pro-government warlords have stored such huge caches of arms, especially in the north when the country has nearly 350,000 security personnel. The fear is several ruler-backed warlords like Mohammad, a leader of the Jamiat-e-Islami party, with hidden arms and ammunition dumps.

Read: Afghan warlord’s anger at being ‘sidelined’ by Ghani

The warlords’ attempt to hide weapons is seen as sheer disregard to the disarmament programme. The process of disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration and the Disband Illegally Armed Groups programmes had been initiated after the collapse of the Taliban government through the Afghanistan’s New Beginnings Programme.

While these programmes can be seen as successfully having achieved their mandate, the major challenge that remains is the disarmament of unofficial militias often associated with warlords and politicians.

The sad aspect of the entire drama is Dr Abdullah’s purported support for the warlord. Hours after the air raid, the chief executive rushed to province where the attack had occurred to show his support for Mohammad, who was one of his main supporters during the presidential elections.

Abdullah also wanted to cool down the anger of the warlord’s supporters who had also reportedly chanted slogans such as “Death to Abdullah”, according to sections of the Afghan media.

Several other leaders of the Northern Alliance also travelled to Parwan in a show of solidarity with the warlord.

Javid Faisal, deputy spokesman for the chief executive, said an explanation had been sought from the foreign forces as to why their jets struck the arms depot.

From Russia with love

Many in Afghanistan believe warlords associated with the Northern Alliance had received and are still receiving weapons from Russia.

Political analyst Hashmat Ghani Ahmadzai told Shamshad TV he was in Russia last month where he had received information that weapons were on their way to Afghanistan.

The Hizb-e-Islami group also believes that Russia has kept supplying arms to the Northern Alliance because of its longstanding relations. “Russia has been providing arms to the Northern Alliance since long and there is no break in arming the Northern Alliance,” the faction’s spokesman Haroon Zarghoon told The Express Tribune.

He recalled a top Northern Alliance commander General Mohammad Daud Daud, a former guard of Ahmad Shah Masood, had received 90, 000 Kalashnikovs when he had visited Russia during the tenure of Hamid Karzai.

Read: US drone strike targeting warlord kills 6 in North Waziristan

“Dr Abdullah and his team are making a hue and cry as they have serious apprehensions now at possible strikes on other illegal and hidden arms caches,” said Zarghoon.

Although President Ashraf Ghani is silent over the US raid, some believe the US conducted the raid with his consent. The police chief of Parwan province, Zaman Mamozai, is reported to have said the operation was coordinated with local authorities. Ghani is also under mounting pressure to investigate if any other warlord has stored illegal weapons.

The government seems apologetic on the issue as former Afghan ambassador Omar Samad posted on Twitter that the national security adviser and the defence minister met Dr Abdullah to “assure that the attack on the former mujahed was not planned or political.”

Members of Parliament are also critical at the storage of weapons by warlords and a parliamentary committee has been formed to investigate the incident, Afghan media reported. Shinkai Karokhail, an MP, said the government should question why the warlord had kept weapons illegally and also who had allowed him to do so, the Afghan Islamic Press reported.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 4th, 2015.



U.S. raid on Afghan weapons cache incites protests

  • Jun. 29, 2015, 10:01 AM
KABUL (Reuters) - U.S. forces conducted a raid to destroy a cache of weapons north of Kabul, the Afghan capital, early on Monday morning, a U.S. army spokesman said, giving rare details of unilateral activity in Afghanistan.

Afghan residents took to the streets in Parwan province in protest. Solo U.S. operations are legal under a bilateral security agreement the two nations signed last year, but the document specifies they occur only in exceptional circumstances.

The raids remain a divisive subject in Afghanistan. They were a key reason then-President Hamid Karzai refused in 2014 to sign a deal allowing U.S. forces to stay in the country. President Ashraf Ghani signed the agreement as soon as he took office in September.

"U.S. Forces conducted an operation ... to destroy a cache of munitions that could be used to conduct attacks against Afghans and Coalition Forces," public affairs director Colonel Brian Tribus said.

Local authorities complained they had not been consulted ahead of time.

"As the operation was launched without coordination of local authorities, it made people angry," a spokesman for the governor, Wahid Sediqqi, said.

U.S. army spokesman Tribus said the operation was conducted in keeping with bilateral military agreements.

Around 9,800 U.S. forces remain in Afghanistan, including around 3,000 troops who operate outside a NATO training mission that ends in 2016.

Little is known about the activities of U.S. counter-terrorism troops that have been authorized to continue fighting the Taliban and other militants after the NATO combat mission officially ended last year.



(Reporting by Jessica Donati and Mirwais Harooni; Editing by Larry King)



Read more: U.S. raid on Afghan weapons cache incites protests - Business Insider

 
The warlords of Afghanistan
By Anup Kaphle, Published: April 1, 2015
After the Soviet occupation ended in 1989, a group of warlords with personal militias stepped into the vacuum, gaining immense power. Now, some of those old faces are coming back as politicians through democratic elections. Here are some of Afghanistan’s prominent warlords, some who have died, and some who will continue to influence Afghanistan for many years.

dadullah.jpg

Mullah Dadullah
Mullah Dadullah lost a leg when he fought with the mujahideen against the Soviet forces in the 1980s. He was said to be close to Taliban leader Mohammad Omar and served as the minister of construction in the Taliban government. Dadullah was killed by U.S. and British troops in Afghanistan in 2007.

dostum.jpg

Abdul Rashid Dostum
In the 1980s, Dostum was in command of an Uzbek militia that fought with AK-47s on horseback. A former general in the Afghan army, he fought against mujahideen fighters as well as the Taliban. He has been accused of being responsible for mass killings of Taliban prisoners.

fahim.jpg

Mohammed Qaseem Fahim
A capable commander, Fahim worked closely as a deputy for Ahmed Shah Massoud. After Massoud was assassinated in 2001, Fahim led the Northern Alliance forces and fought against the Taliban, recapturing Kabul. He later became the defense minister of Afghanistan and served as vice president under Hamid Karzai.

hekmatyar.jpg

Gulbuddin Hekmatyar
Hekmatyar is designated a terrorist by the United States and leads the Hezb-i-Islami political party. During the war against Soviet Union, Hekmatyar's mujahideen fighters received funding from the CIA, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. But his role during the war came under criticism, as he ordered attacks on rival groups to strengthen his power. After taking refuge in Iran for some time, he is now thought to be moving in and out of the tribal areas between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

khan.jpg

Ismail Khan
Khan rose to power while battling the Soviets in Afghanistan. He fought them for 13 years to retake Herat province and became its governor. When Mohammad Omar attacked and captured Herat in 1995, Khan was thrown into a prison in Kandahar. After he escaped in 1999, he joined forces with Ahmed Shah Massoud in the Northern Alliance. He fought alongside U.S. forces against the Taliban in 2001 and then quickly consolidated his control over Herat, appointing himself as the governor. After Karzai removed him from power in 2005, he took an offer to become the minister of water and energy.

mohaqeq.jpg

Mohammad Mohaqiq
Mohaqiq, a Hazara commander, played an active role in fighting against Soviet troops after they invaded in 1979. When they left, he became the head of the Hezb-i-Wahdat political group, which worked to address political demands of the Hazara ethnic group. After the fall of the Taliban in 2001, Mohaqiq was appointed vice-president and oversaw the Ministry of Planning, but he was removed from the government over his differences with Karzai. Mohaqiq commands support within the Hazara community and was a vice presidential candidate for Abdullah Abdullah in the 2014 election.

massoud.jpg

Ahmed Shah Massoud
Massoud was a charismatic military leader who led the resistance against Soviet occupation and was known as the "Lion of the Panjshir." Massoud formed the United Front, also known as the Northern Alliance, to counter the advance of the Taliban. He became defense minister in 1992. He was assassinated two days before the Sept. 11 attack.
 
noor.jpg

Atta Mohammad Noor
Often referred to as "Ustad," meaning "the teacher," Atta Mohammad Noor served as the senior commander for the Northern Alliance forces in Mazar-e Sharif before the fall of Taliban in 2001. Three years later, Karzai appointed him as the governor of Balkh province. He ruled the northern region with an iron fist, leading to accusations of widespread looting and mass executions. With his warlord legacy tucked in, he has now transformed himself into an ultra-rich businessman.


omar.jpg

Mohammed Omar
Omar, often referred to as Mullah Omar, is the spiritual leader of the Taliban and ruled Afghanistan as its de facto head of state from 1996 to 2001. He came to power only a few years after he gathered a group of his old mujahideen fighters and formed the Taliban, which under his leadership defeated some of the most powerful warlords in Afghanistan. When U.S. forces entered Kabul in 2001, Omar disappeared, and he has been in hiding since. He is wanted by the United States for his role in sheltering Osama bin Laden and continuing to operate an insurgency in Afghanistan.


sayyaf.jpg

Abdurrab Rasul Sayyaf
Sayyaf, a religious scholar turned mujahideen commander, built a close relationship with Osama bin Laden during their fight against Soviet forces. After the war ended, Sayyaf continued to maintain his training camps, helping recruit jihadists to fight in conflicts as far away as the Philippines, where his name inspired a separatist group now known as Abu Sayyaf. In the remaining days of Karzai's presidency, Sayyaf was recruited to help settle the issue of the presence of U.S. Special Forces in volatile Wardak province.


sherzai.jpg

Gul Agha Sherzai
A former Mujahideen commander, Sherzai helped topple Mohammed Najibullah's government. He became the governor of Kandahar twice, and he used his power to strengthen his position and help his tribe. When the Taliban conquered Kandahar after 1994, he left the city and remained hidden until 2001, when he recaptured Kandahar with the help of U.S. forces. During the Karzai administration, he served as governor of Nangahar province.



SOURCE: The Washington Post; Associated Press; Getty Images.
 
what you mean by still ? they are they were and they will rule afghanistan
 
some pf them are useless.there is no doubt that pastoons are pro pakistan and all the rest are not much
 
Back
Top Bottom