What's new

Vietnam reclaiming land in South China Sea: Report

Viet

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
29,950
Reaction score
0
Country
Viet Nam
Location
Germany
  • AFP, Hanoi
  • Updated: May 08, 2015 16:05 IST
5b6318d2-cb67-441d-a535-1cd5b2389358wallpaper1.jpg


New satellite images show Vietnam has carried out significant land reclamation at two sites in the disputed South China Sea, but the scale and pace of the work is dwarfed by that of China, a US research institute said. (Reuters)


Vietnam has carried out significant land reclamation at two sites in disputed South China Sea waters, recent satellite pictures show, but analysts say the scale of the work is dwarfed by that of China.

The images, taken late last month by DigitalGlobe and shown on the website of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), show land expansions at Sand Cay and West London Reef, both part of the Spratly Islands.

"Between August 2011 and February 2015 significant upgrades were made to (Sand Cay)," CSIS said, noting the island's land mass had expanded from 41,690 to 62,970 square meters.

Vietnam also appears to have added "defensive structures," including trenches and gun emplacements, it said.

At West Reef -- which is part of the London Reefs group of western Spratly Islands -- some 65,000 meters of land have been reclaimed with new structures, including a harbour, being added, it said.

The work appears to have begun in August 2012, CSIS said, long before Beijing launched a flurry of reclamation projects last year.

r

West London Reef is pictured in the South China Sea in 2015, in this handout photo provided by CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative/DigitalGlobe.


The Spratlys are considered a potential Asian flashpoint, and the United States and claimant nations have expressed alarm as China has embarked on massive and speedy reclamation activity.

China claims nearly all of the South China Sea, locking it into disputes with several Southeast Asian neighbours.

Its claims overlap those of Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam and Taiwan. China has undertaken major reclamation work on seven Spratly features in the last year.

"Chinese activity is clearly on an entirely different scale," said Vietnam expert Jonathan London of Hong Kong's City University.

"Vietnam appears to be now trying to strengthen its position with added urgency," London said.

"Not only is there a sort of regional arms race but a rush to claim maritime areas, rock features and things of this nature," in disputed waters in the region which is a key global trading route, he added.

Some $5 trillion of sea-borne trade passes through the area each year. China's island-building in the Spratlys has been seen as part of an attempt to assert its territorial claims by establishing physical facts in the water.

Fiery Cross in the Spratly Islands was little more than a reef until last year when China began reclamation work.

It now has a partially-finished airstrip with a 3.1 kilometres (1.9 miles) runway. It also appears to be undertaking work at a feature known as Mischief Reef, just 100 kilometres (60 miles) from the southwestern Philippine island of Palawan.

Vietnam has an airstrip on the largest Spratly Island it controls, which was renovated in 2000 and can accommodate helicopters or small planes. Vietnam's Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the new satellite images.


Vietnam reclaiming land in South China Sea: Report
 
.
this article is proof that vietcong and pinoy friends has been lying, playing innocent crying little boys to the world. lol. they little boys started the fight with weak jabs several times thrown at big bad china dragon first, then...haha.. :lol:

pMTQrFR.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
During a meeting with charge d’affaires ad interim Li Zhimin of the Chinese Embassy in Vietnam on 15 June 1956, Vice Foreign Minister of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam Ung Van Khiem solemnly stated that, “according to Vietnamese data, the Xisha Islands and Nansha Islands are historically part of Chinese territory.”

Le Loc, Acting Director of the Asian Department of the Vietnamese Foreign Ministry, who was present, specifically cited Vietnamese data and pointed out that, “judging from history, these islands were already part of China at the time of the Song Dynasty.“
 
.
this article is proof that vietcong and pinoy friends has been lying, playing innocent crying little boys to the world. lol. they little boys started the fight with weak jabs several times thrown at big bad china dragon first, then...haha.. :lol:

pMTQrFR.jpg
I like your drawing. nice.

During a meeting with charge d’affaires ad interim Li Zhimin of the Chinese Embassy in Vietnam on 15 June 1956, Vice Foreign Minister of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam Ung Van Khiem solemnly stated that, “according to Vietnamese data, the Xisha Islands and Nansha Islands are historically part of Chinese territory.”

Le Loc, Acting Director of the Asian Department of the Vietnamese Foreign Ministry, who was present, specifically cited Vietnamese data and pointed out that, “judging from history, these islands were already part of China at the time of the Song Dynasty.“
since the Song? your imagination amazes me.

if I remember from the history, during the Ly dynasty after we noticed your military build-up along the common border and southern china, we decided to launch a pre-emptive strike on the Song army in Qinzhou. and as everbody know Qinzhou is coastal city in China. and from there it is 1,000s miles distance to the islands in the south china sea. how did you control the islands if we visited you in your home city?
 
.
since the Song? your imagination amazes me.

if I remember from the history, during the Ly dynasty after we noticed your military build-up along the common border and southern china, we decided to launch a pre-emptive strike on the Song army in Qinzhou. and as everbody know Qinzhou is coastal city in China. and from there it is 1,000s miles distance to the islands in the south china sea. how did you control the islands if we visited you in your home city?

Can you read that "on 15 June 1956" ?

We have to do the quality suveying works to check if the Vietnamese and Pinoys are doing their jobs properly after we take over.

images
 
. .
During a meeting with charge d’affaires ad interim Li Zhimin of the Chinese Embassy in Vietnam on 15 June 1956, Vice Foreign Minister of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam Ung Van Khiem solemnly stated that, “according to Vietnamese data, the Xisha Islands and Nansha Islands are historically part of Chinese territory.”

Le Loc, Acting Director of the Asian Department of the Vietnamese Foreign Ministry, who was present, specifically cited Vietnamese data and pointed out that, “judging from history, these islands were already part of China at the time of the Song Dynasty.“

Proof of your words !? Any map !?

Everytime, Pham Van Dong's letter was best things that Chinese can bring up, and many bla bla bla ... no maps, but 9-10-11-dash-lines crap ...
 
.
Proof of your words
Again,not my word.

Also no map needed,it‘s just a recognition of China’s sovereignty by Vietnam govt officials for a brief period of time. Which later got overthrown. But still means something
 
.
Again,not my word.

Also no map needed,it‘s just a recognition of China’s sovereignty by Vietnam govt officials for a brief period of time. Which later got overthrown. But still means something

China said = lie.

after 1954, Islands belong to South Vietnam, North Vietnam does not have right to say about Islands of South Vietnamese. kid.
 
Last edited:
.
Again,not my word.

Also no map needed,it‘s just a recognition of China’s sovereignty by Vietnam govt officials for a brief period of time. Which later got overthrown. But still means something

I suggest you dont need to reply every comment by the Viets
When you read one comment you read the whole forum. The rhetorics like "lie, map, aggressor, invader, bully, kick xxx out ... " are repeating a zillion times in their collective comments

images
 
.
I suggest you dont need to reply every comment by the Viets
When you read one comment you read the whole forum. The rhetorics like "lie, map, aggressor, invader, bully, kick xxx out ... " are repeating a zillion times in their collective comments

images

LOL, I suggest you shut your mouth and do not typing anything relate to Vietnam and Vietnamese and get lost like always. :rofl:

Again,not my word.

Also no map needed,it‘s just a recognition of China’s sovereignty by Vietnam govt officials for a brief period of time. Which later got overthrown. But still means something

The letter was simple comfort and trick words for Chinese leader's greedy, we're never recognize that stupid dash-lines map, only 12nm from your mainland.
If there's not the letter, so what was your best proof that you can base on about your claim !? :meeting:
 
.
The letter was simple comfort and trick words for Chinese leader's greedy, we're never recognize that stupid dash-lines map, only 12nm from your mainland.
If there's not the letter, so what was your best proof that you can base on about your claim !? :meeting:
I believe China has the meeting memo witch will be presented when we see fit. Of course I can‘t get a copy for you if that's what you are asking. But even if I could,would your govt just evacuate the islands? dont think so.

Right now it's just a card hasn't been played
 
.
I believe China has the meeting memo witch will be presented when we see fit. Of course I can‘t get a copy for you if that's what you are asking. But even if I could,would your govt just evacuate the islands? dont think so.

Right now it's just a card hasn't been played

LOL, I think China best card was your believe. :coffee:

When people believe in such ridiculous map and claim, so China Govt could do as they want, used mass resource of Chinese to rob and take territory of other countries for their purpose. :sick:
 
.
Ancient Chinese maps debunk Peking fabrications. Engraved in stone in Fuchang in 1136AD during the Song Dynasty, this map of China entitled 'Hua Yi Tu' . No where is Paracel and Spratly.

c-map1.jpg
 
.
Don't waste our time in argue this, let the court does that work.
China has no right to blame PH, VN, while the reefs they used for land reclamation derived from robbing PH and VN reefs.
If you need evidence, everybody could prove what China did to get those reefs.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom