What's new

Vietnam Economy Forum

How stupid are you ? you troll on inflation or deflation ?

base on your link, it stated:


"After decelerating in the first two months of the year, consumer prices fell by 0.44 percent in March.
Four out of the 11 goods in the basket measured by the consumer price index saw price declines, according to the Hanoi-based General Statistics Office.
Food and food services saw the largest fall of 0.96 percent.
Housing and building materials prices followed at 0.74 percent.
The net inflation rate in the first three months has been 0.82 percent, the lowest rate in several years."
:omghaha:

Hey it was your country man who wrote it. Take it up with him. Don't worry, I got more bad news coming your way.

First Vietnam is in inflation mode, now they are in deflation mode. Nothing wrong with inflation as long as your GDP increase matches it, but it doesn't , so you're screwed. Now along comes deflation, which is worse than inflation. Means your economy is contracting. Stay tune, Vietnam economy is going to crash.
 
.
even the inflation rate is true, not as usual, faked, it will say nothing, as one of main supports of Viet Nam economy, the trade or economic connection with China, has been weakened, i can see no good view for Viet Nam, either politics or economy.
one word, desperate, more and more.
reason: because in all neighbored countries of China, the national policy of Vietnam most sucks.
How stupid are you ? you troll on inflation or deflation ?

base on your link, it stated:


"After decelerating in the first two months of the year, consumer prices fell by 0.44 percent in March.
Four out of the 11 goods in the basket measured by the consumer price index saw price declines, according to the Hanoi-based General Statistics Office.
Food and food services saw the largest fall of 0.96 percent.
Housing and building materials prices followed at 0.74 percent.
The net inflation rate in the first three months has been 0.82 percent, the lowest rate in several years."
:omghaha:
 
.
Hey it was your country man who wrote it. Take it up with him. Don't worry, I got more bad news coming your way.

First Vietnam is in inflation mode, now they are in deflation mode. Nothing wrong with inflation as long as your GDP increase matches it, but it doesn't , so you're screwed. Now along comes deflation, which is worse than inflation. Means your economy is contracting. Stay tune, Vietnam economy is going to crash.

even the inflation rate is true, not as usual, faked, it will say nothing, as one of main supports of Viet Nam economy, the trade or economic connection with China, has been weakened, i can see no good view for Viet Nam, either politics or economy.
one word, desperate, more and more.
reason: because in all neighbored countries of China, the national policy of Vietnam most sucks.

I said that this is wet dream of our enemy, ha ha. :woot:
 
.
Public debt may exceed state revenues by 25% this year
  • By Lam Thanh | dtinews.vn | April 28, 2014 05:18 PM


  • Vietnam's public debt may be 25% more than the country’s total state revenues this year and it may climb to 30% in coming years, said Dr. Tran Dinh Thien, head of the Vietnam Institute of Economics.

    Trandinhthien284-2e57e.jpg


    Dr. Tran Dinh Thien, head of Vietnam Institute of Economics

    Thien announced his projection during a recent two-day economic forum, where he added that bad debt and public debt have formed a "bottleneck" and represent the biggest challenge to the Vietnamese economy.

    According to Thien, there is still a lack of reliable risk assessment on bad and public debt, and there is a huge discrepancy between the released numbers and the reality of these debts in Vietnam.

    Recently it was revealed that public debt accounted for 55.7% of the country’s GDP, still considered a safe level, while regulations cap it at 65%. This has created a misperception of the national public debt. Thien pointed out that, If the debt of state-owned enterprises, which is not guaranteed by the government, and debt taken on for public construction works were included, the country's total debt would account for 100% of the GDP.

    Thien also noted that Vietnam is facing the risk of public debt growing at a faster rate than the GDP. At the same time, the governments ability to repay remains limited.

    He cited figures on the rise of public debt in Vietnam in the period between 2010 and 2014. This year, the country will have to pay VND209 trillion (USD9.9 billion) of its debt, which may surpass the country’s total revenues for the year.

    Thien suggested that the government speed up revision of the laws on public debt and state-owned enterprises as well as the equitization of private companies.

    Public debt may exceed state revenues by 25% this year | DTiNews - Dan Tri International, the news gateway of Vietnam

    _________________________________
    Told you there's bad news coming. Vietnam already spend more than what they make, your economy is going to crash!

    Unlike your daddy US who can print money and not devalue their currency, Vietnam cannot do so without further devaluing their currency. Vietnam fake economy!

    :pop:
 
. . .
My vietnamese friends love talking bullshit on Chinese threads. At least I'm not talking BS but back it up with articles relevant to this thread.

Here is biggest bullshxt in China.

China's Debt: How Serious Is It?

In a report ordered by China’s State Council last June, the country’s National Audit Office reported in December that the debts of China’s local governments had increased to RMB 17.9 trillion ($3.0 trillion) by the end of June 2013. This amount, which includes contingent liabilities and debt guarantees, represents a 70 percent increase from the RMB 10.7 trillion ($1.8 trillion) owed by the country’s local governments at the end of 2010.

read more here.
China's Debt: How Serious Is It? - Forbes

Does the explosion of local government debt in China mean that the country has a debt problem? If so, how serious is it? Does it threaten China’s economy?

Before these questions can be answered, China’s local government debt must be viewed first in relation to China’s GDP, and then in relation to the debt levels that exist in other countries.

Because the central government is ultimately responsible for all local-level debts in China, local debt must be added to central government debt to come up with a total government debt/GDP ratio. Andy Rothman, China Macro Strategist for CLSA, puts this ratio at 53.5 percent for 2012 – up from 43.5 percent in 2010, 44.1 percent in 2009, and 32.9 percent in 2005. Compared to the United States and most developed European countries where government debt levels are near 100 percent of GDP, China’s government debt/GDP ratio is not exceptionally high. For this reason, as well as the fact that China’s economic growth rate, while slowing, remains significantly faster than most of the rest of the world, Andy concludes that China’s total government debt is high but manageable in the near term.

However, government debt is just one component of a country’s indebtedness. A country’s “total debt” includes government debt, as well as the debt of financial institutions, non-financial businesses and households. According to the China Balance Sheet 2013 released by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), China’s total debt amounted to RMB 111.6 trillion ($18.3 trillion) at the end of 2012, which was 215.7 percent of that year’s GDP. Of this amount, corporate debt equaled 113.5 percent of GDP; government debt, 53.5 percent; household debt, 31.1 percent; and financial sector debt, 17.6 percent.
 
.
wow, China is in deep debt, so, next time, Viet Nam PM and president are not necessary to go to Beijing for begging money.
Here is biggest bullshxt in China.

China's Debt: How Serious Is It?

In a report ordered by China’s State Council last June, the country’s National Audit Office reported in December that the debts of China’s local governments had increased to RMB 17.9 trillion ($3.0 trillion) by the end of June 2013. This amount, which includes contingent liabilities and debt guarantees, represents a 70 percent increase from the RMB 10.7 trillion ($1.8 trillion) owed by the country’s local governments at the end of 2010.

read more here.
China's Debt: How Serious Is It? - Forbes

Does the explosion of local government debt in China mean that the country has a debt problem? If so, how serious is it? Does it threaten China’s economy?

Before these questions can be answered, China’s local government debt must be viewed first in relation to China’s GDP, and then in relation to the debt levels that exist in other countries.

Because the central government is ultimately responsible for all local-level debts in China, local debt must be added to central government debt to come up with a total government debt/GDP ratio. Andy Rothman, China Macro Strategist for CLSA, puts this ratio at 53.5 percent for 2012 – up from 43.5 percent in 2010, 44.1 percent in 2009, and 32.9 percent in 2005. Compared to the United States and most developed European countries where government debt levels are near 100 percent of GDP, China’s government debt/GDP ratio is not exceptionally high. For this reason, as well as the fact that China’s economic growth rate, while slowing, remains significantly faster than most of the rest of the world, Andy concludes that China’s total government debt is high but manageable in the near term.

However, government debt is just one component of a country’s indebtedness. A country’s “total debt” includes government debt, as well as the debt of financial institutions, non-financial businesses and households. According to the China Balance Sheet 2013 released by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), China’s total debt amounted to RMB 111.6 trillion ($18.3 trillion) at the end of 2012, which was 215.7 percent of that year’s GDP. Of this amount, corporate debt equaled 113.5 percent of GDP; government debt, 53.5 percent; household debt, 31.1 percent; and financial sector debt, 17.6 percent.
 
.
Here is biggest bullshxt in China.

Vietnam Quadrillion Dollar in Debt

Vietnam can't pay its public debts: economist
By Nguyen Hang, Thanh Nien News

May 28, 2014 16:12 Email Print

publicdebt_VQAX.JPG
Statistics about Vietnam's public debt on the Global Debt Clock
RELATED NEWS
Without effective investments, Vietnam has no reliable resources with which to repay its growing public debt, Do Thien Anh Tuan, a lecturer at the Fulbright Economics Teaching Program, told Thanh Nien newspaper.
On Sunday, the Global Debt Clock maintained by The Economist magazine described Vietnam’s public debt as nearly US$81.5 billion or 47.8 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP).
The debt increases by 11 percent every year.
Tuan said the state's annual income, mainly drawn from taxes and fees, represents one of its main resources for paying the debt.
But the income has been falling.
According to a recent report published on the website of Vietnam's Customs Department, the state's revenues were equivalent to just 27.3 percent of its GDP in 2010 and only 22.9 percent of last year's GDP. This year, that figure is expected to be just 18.5 percent.
In fact, Vietnam always operates in a deficit as its revenues are never enough to cover its spending. Every year, the government sets a ceiling for its expected annual debt.
Last year, the ceiling was 4.8 percent of GDP; this year it rose to 5.3 percent.
Spending part of the state's reduced income paying off its debts will cut into other expenses, like investments, Tuan said.
If the situation continues, the debt and its interest will eventually “eat up” the state's revenues, he said.
The economist quoted a debt statement issued by the Ministry of Finance last October as saying that in 2012, Vietnam paid nearly $2.7 billion in interest and over $4 billion on original debts, making the total debt payment equivalent to nearly 16 percent of the state’s 2012 revenues.
That rate increased to over 20 percent this year after the government planned to spend nearly VND208.9 trillion ($9.88 billion) on debt and interest payments, he said.
On the other hand, the government has had to increasingly borrow to pay off its maturing short-term loans.
This year, for instance, it plans to borrow VND367 trillion ($17.36 billion), of which some VND70 trillion ($3.31 billion) will be spent paying debts that are currently due.
However, Tuan said, Vietnam cannot continue to do so, because the “golden rule” is that the government should invest borrowed money, not spend it.
“Investments create new income to pay off debt. But, in our case, investments are not effective.”
He further explained that the method of “taking on new loans to pay old debts” seems to leave the scale of the debt virtually unchanged and shows that Vietnam's creditworthiness is decreasing.
Naturally, the country's lenders are demanding increased interest rates on its current loans as “financial distress costs.”
As Vietnam’s public debt rises due to the government’s continued failure to reform its administrative system and public sector, the costs are going up as well, Tuan said.
“The public debt's burden is on the government, but in reality it weighs us all down, and it is getting heavier.”
According the Global Debt Clock, with the 90.6-million-strong population, Vietnam’s public debt per person has hit $901.05, four times higher than it was 10 years ago.
During a legislative session last week, many lawmakers urged the government to submit detailed reports on public debt, including how loans (particularly official development assistance) have been allocated and how the government plans to pay them off.
They also expressed their concern about Vietnam’s public debt levels.
The government has repeatedly affirmed that its debts remain well within the safety range of 65 percent of its GDP; but, many local economists argue that it would far exceed that limit if Vietnam followed international accounting standards.
Foreign debt woes
Tuan said that in terms of domestic debt, the government can never go bankrupt. “Theoretically,” it can always increase taxes to generate income and print more cash, although both solutions pose threats to the economy.
But, in order to pay external debt, the government has to accumulate foreign currency, leaving its capacity to pay off its debts dependent on its foreign currency reserves, he said.
The economist was not positive about the Vietnam's all-time high of $35 billion in foreign currency, which Governor Nguyen Van Binh of the State Bank of Vietnam, announced at the end of last month.
“It is actually a kind of debt,” Tuan said.
He explained that Vietnam's trade deficit helps bring in more foreign currencies but also increases foreign debt.
In the short-term, Vietnam can pay its external debt with its foreign currency reserves.
That option will prove impossible in the long term, however, so long as the trade deficit continues, he said.
Tuan said a country’s ability to pay foreign debt is determined by its capacity to make globally competitive products. Such products, increase imports and bring back foreign currency that the country actually owns and can use to pay its debts.
In an article published by the Ministry of Finance in February, Nguyen Thanh Do, director of the ministry’s Department for Debts and Foreign Finance Management, estimated that Vietnam’s external debts hit $69 billion at the end of 2013, or 39.5 percent of its GDP.
"With Vietnam's current [economic] situation, we cannot sleep [without worrying about debts]," Tuan said.
 
.
My vietnamese friends love talking bullshit on Chinese threads. At least I'm not talking BS but back it up with articles relevant to this thread.
Well we apologize that some of our members are trolls, but that doesn't mean you should stoop down to their level by doing the same thing.
 
.
Vietnam Quadrillion Dollar in Debt

Vietnam can't pay its public debts: economist
By Nguyen Hang, Thanh Nien News

May 28, 2014 16:12 Email Print

publicdebt_VQAX.JPG
Statistics about Vietnam's public debt on the Global Debt Clock
RELATED NEWS
Without effective investments, Vietnam has no reliable resources with which to repay its growing public debt, Do Thien Anh Tuan, a lecturer at the Fulbright Economics Teaching Program, told Thanh Nien newspaper.
On Sunday, the Global Debt Clock maintained by The Economist magazine described Vietnam’s public debt as nearly US$81.5 billion or 47.8 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP).
The debt increases by 11 percent every year.
Tuan said the state's annual income, mainly drawn from taxes and fees, represents one of its main resources for paying the debt.
But the income has been falling.
According to a recent report published on the website of Vietnam's Customs Department, the state's revenues were equivalent to just 27.3 percent of its GDP in 2010 and only 22.9 percent of last year's GDP. This year, that figure is expected to be just 18.5 percent.
In fact, Vietnam always operates in a deficit as its revenues are never enough to cover its spending. Every year, the government sets a ceiling for its expected annual debt.
Last year, the ceiling was 4.8 percent of GDP; this year it rose to 5.3 percent.
Spending part of the state's reduced income paying off its debts will cut into other expenses, like investments, Tuan said.
If the situation continues, the debt and its interest will eventually “eat up” the state's revenues, he said.
The economist quoted a debt statement issued by the Ministry of Finance last October as saying that in 2012, Vietnam paid nearly $2.7 billion in interest and over $4 billion on original debts, making the total debt payment equivalent to nearly 16 percent of the state’s 2012 revenues.
That rate increased to over 20 percent this year after the government planned to spend nearly VND208.9 trillion ($9.88 billion) on debt and interest payments, he said.
On the other hand, the government has had to increasingly borrow to pay off its maturing short-term loans.
This year, for instance, it plans to borrow VND367 trillion ($17.36 billion), of which some VND70 trillion ($3.31 billion) will be spent paying debts that are currently due.
However, Tuan said, Vietnam cannot continue to do so, because the “golden rule” is that the government should invest borrowed money, not spend it.
“Investments create new income to pay off debt. But, in our case, investments are not effective.”
He further explained that the method of “taking on new loans to pay old debts” seems to leave the scale of the debt virtually unchanged and shows that Vietnam's creditworthiness is decreasing.
Naturally, the country's lenders are demanding increased interest rates on its current loans as “financial distress costs.”
As Vietnam’s public debt rises due to the government’s continued failure to reform its administrative system and public sector, the costs are going up as well, Tuan said.
“The public debt's burden is on the government, but in reality it weighs us all down, and it is getting heavier.”
According the Global Debt Clock, with the 90.6-million-strong population, Vietnam’s public debt per person has hit $901.05, four times higher than it was 10 years ago.
During a legislative session last week, many lawmakers urged the government to submit detailed reports on public debt, including how loans (particularly official development assistance) have been allocated and how the government plans to pay them off.
They also expressed their concern about Vietnam’s public debt levels.
The government has repeatedly affirmed that its debts remain well within the safety range of 65 percent of its GDP; but, many local economists argue that it would far exceed that limit if Vietnam followed international accounting standards.
Foreign debt woes
Tuan said that in terms of domestic debt, the government can never go bankrupt. “Theoretically,” it can always increase taxes to generate income and print more cash, although both solutions pose threats to the economy.
But, in order to pay external debt, the government has to accumulate foreign currency, leaving its capacity to pay off its debts dependent on its foreign currency reserves, he said.
The economist was not positive about the Vietnam's all-time high of $35 billion in foreign currency, which Governor Nguyen Van Binh of the State Bank of Vietnam, announced at the end of last month.
“It is actually a kind of debt,” Tuan said.
He explained that Vietnam's trade deficit helps bring in more foreign currencies but also increases foreign debt.
In the short-term, Vietnam can pay its external debt with its foreign currency reserves.
That option will prove impossible in the long term, however, so long as the trade deficit continues, he said.
Tuan said a country’s ability to pay foreign debt is determined by its capacity to make globally competitive products. Such products, increase imports and bring back foreign currency that the country actually owns and can use to pay its debts.
In an article published by the Ministry of Finance in February, Nguyen Thanh Do, director of the ministry’s Department for Debts and Foreign Finance Management, estimated that Vietnam’s external debts hit $69 billion at the end of 2013, or 39.5 percent of its GDP.
"With Vietnam's current [economic] situation, we cannot sleep [without worrying about debts]," Tuan said.

China’s Growing Debt Problem :taz:

One of the most telling economic events since the financial crisis has gone almost entirely unnoticed. A few weeks ago, China had its first corporate-bond default. The company in question, a solar-energy-equipment firm called Shanghai Chaori, was small, private, highly leveraged and not very important. But the default speaks volumes about the state of the world’s second largest economy. China is in the middle of a debt crisis the likes of which we haven’t seen since the fall of Lehman Brothers. Chaori’s default was tiny by comparison. It couldn’t make a payment on a $163 million bond; Lehman owed $613 billion when it folded. But it’s the tip of an iceberg that is now nearly double the size of China’s GDP. By allowing Chaori to go bust, the Chinese signaled they’re no longer in denial about the problem.

U.S. Stepping Up Scrutiny of China’s Military MovesInto the Wild Blue Yonder'No Guarantees': Coyotes Rule Lawless Waystation NBC NewsBritney Spears' 'Alien' Without Auto-Tune Is Not Meant To Be HeardHuffington PostMiscarriage Amid the Rubble: Gazans Cower Under Attacks NBC News
That matters in a country in which statistics are precooked and every economic move, even the run-up in debt itself, is planned. Back in December 2008, I met in Beijing with Jiang Jianqing, the head of ICBC, China’s largest financial institution. He acknowledged that the massive government stimulus program that was put in place to cope with the global slowdown would result in a higher percentage of bad Chinese loans. After all, when Beijing says, “Lend,” state-owned banks ask, “How much?” even if borrowers aren’t creditworthy. China’s biggest banks wrote off more than twice the level of bad loans last year as they did in 2012.

no surprise given the size of China’s debt bubble. Over a year ago, Ruchir Sharma, head of emerging markets for Morgan Stanley Investment Management, pointed out that China was pumping out credit faster than any other country. The problem: much of it went into dubious public-sector investment (unneeded rail lines and housing projects) rather than productive private enterprises. Five years ago it took just over a dollar of debt to create a dollar of economic growth in China. Today it takes four dollars of debt to create a dollar of growth. Those are crisis numbers by any standard.

A financial crisis in China isn’t the same as one in the U.S. For one, Chinese debt is almost completely Chinese-owned. A large chunk of it is in the public sector, and the central government, which holds some $4 trillion in reserves, can bail out firms at will. Indeed, as the Conference Board’s China economist Andrew Polk points out, they’ve done that more than 20 times in the past two years, a measure of how long the crisis has been brewing. “It will be difficult for China to have a Lehman moment,” he says, “because China can always find a buyer of last resort somewhere in the state system.”

That sounds good, but it also means China can let its debt crisis fester. That will only make things worse in the long run, increasing moral hazard and slowing economic growth, which may be as low as 5% this year. (That’s down from double digits a few years back.) Worse, the government is already using those figures as a reason to backtrack on its recent promises to reform the economy. Beijing is now talking about more stimulus to keep the country’s growth rate up around the 7% it says is needed to keep unemployment from reaching dangerous levels. China’s leaders fear unemployed masses taking to the streets: historically in the Middle Kingdom, those sorts of events tend to end with people being paraded around and then shot.

Trouble is, the argument that more debt is needed to keep unemployment down no longer holds water. As Sharma points out, every percentage point of GDP growth now creates around 1.7 million new jobs–up from 1.2 million a decade ago. Also, fewer young people are coming into the workforce as the population ages. That means even 5% growth would likely keep the Chinese economy stable. So why isn’t the country doing more to deflate its debt bubble and change its economic model? Because as in the U.S., the political and economic elite have little impetus to change a system that has made them fantastically wealthy.

That’s the real economic risk factor in China right now. While Beijing may allow firms like Chaori, which are not systemically important, to go under in order to convince people that it’s grappling with the debt issues, provincial governments and state-owned companies are still too big to fail. That might not result in a Lehman Brothers moment. But it will make it harder and harder for the country to move to its next stage of economic development, which, given that China has represented about a third of global growth since the 2008 financial crisis, has implications for us all. Will China be a drag or a boon to the global economy? Perhaps more than at any other time since the country began its transition to capitalism some 30 years ago, the answer is as blurry as the air in Beijing.


China’s Growing Debt Problem - TIME
 
.
Việt Nam lẽ ra phải có mức thu nhập trên 7.000 USD/người
22/07/2014 02:25
btbacktop-social.png

Tin tức
6
Bình luận

Fanpage Thanh Niên
Tôi Viết

Nếu VN thực sự quyết liệt cải cách để nâng cao chỉ số về năng lực cạnh tranh, thu nhập đầu người sẽ cao hơn hiện nay rất nhiều.


khai-thue-doanh-nghiep_.jpg

Mất quá nhiều thời gian làm thủ tục thuế là một trong những hạn chế làm giảm năng lực cạnh tranh quốc gia của VN - Ảnh: Ngọc Thắng

Nhận định đó được các chuyên gia đưa ra tại hội thảo về chỉ số xếp hạng môi trường kinh doanh của VN do Viện Nghiên cứu quản lý kinh tế trung ương (CIEM) phối hợp với Tổ chức USAID (Mỹ) tổ chức hôm qua ở Hà Nội.

Ông Olin McGill, chuyên gia của USAID đã tỏ ý ngạc nhiên khi theo tính toán của Ngân hàng Thế giới (WB), thu nhập bình quân đầu người ở VN chỉ là 1.400 USD/năm. Bởi theo ông, ở vị trí xếp hạng môi trường cạnh tranh 99/189 nền kinh tế, bình quân thu nhập ở VN lẽ ra phải ở mức trên 7.000 USD/người.

Nhiều chỉ số rất kém

Cụ thể, theo ông Olin McGill, trong xếp hạng môi trường cạnh tranh 189 nước năm 2014 (do WB công bố), các nước trong nhóm xếp hạng từ 1 đến 30 có thu nhập bình quân đầu người (chỉ số GNI) là 35.155 USD, nhóm từ 31 - 60 có GNI là 20.642 USD, nhóm nước xếp hạng từ 91 - 120 có GNI là 7.545 USD. “VN xếp hạng thứ 99, như vậy, mức chênh lệnh thu nhập bình quân thực tế theo tính toán của WB với mức thu nhập phổ biến của các nước trong bảng xếp hạng này lên tới 6.145 USD”, ông Olin McGill nói.



quote1.gif;pv9fd2aab5433eefcc

VN xếp hạng thứ 99, như vậy, mức chênh lệnh thu nhập bình quân thực tế theo tính toán của WB với mức thu nhập phổ biến của các nước trong bảng xếp hạng này lên tới 6.145 USD


quote2.gif;pv337a7fb6f27ef78c

Ông Olin Mcgill, chuyên gia của USAID
Các chuyên gia của USAID, CIEM… nhận định dù đứng ở vị trí 99 nhưng nhiều chỉ số cạnh tranh của VN không thực sự tốt và nó kéo lùi mức thu nhập bình quân đầu người của VN.

Theo TS Nguyễn Đình Cung, Viện trưởng CIEM, vừa qua, Chính phủ đã ban hành Nghị quyết (NQ) số 19/NQ-CP (ngày 18.3.2014) về những nhiệm vụ, giải pháp cải thiện môi trường kinh doanh, nâng cao năng lực cạnh tranh quốc gia. Tuy nhiên, “ở một số bộ, ngành, các chương trình hành động để cải thiện môi trường kinh doanh rất chung chung. NQ 19 đưa ra 19 chỉ tiêu và các phương pháp cụ thể nhưng một số bộ không nhắm vào phương pháp và chỉ tiêu nào cả. Tôi chỉ thấy Bộ Tài chính và Bộ Kế hoạch - Đầu tư có vài chỉ tiêu về khởi sự kinh doanh, bảo vệ lợi ích nhà đầu tư là tương đối đúng theo NQ này, còn các bộ khác thì không", ông Cung nói.

Chuyên gia Olin McGill chỉ ra một số chỉ số quan trọng của VN có thứ hạng rất kém như chỉ số tiếp cận nguồn điện (156/189), chỉ số bảo vệ nhà đầu tư (157/189), chỉ số thành lập doanh nghiệp (143/189), chỉ số nộp thuế (149/189)… nên dù có một số chỉ số tạm ổn như giao dịch thương mại qua biên giới (65/189), đăng ký quyền sở hữu tài sản (51/189)... nhưng thứ hạng môi trường kinh doanh của VN vẫn bị kéo xuống khá sâu.

“Về nộp thuế thì quá kinh khủng. Mất hơn 800 giờ nộp thuế/năm với doanh nghiệp là vấn đề rất nghiêm trọng. Ngay ở những nước gọi là kém về vấn đề này, thường cũng chỉ mất 300 giờ/năm thôi. Thời gian làm thủ tục cho bảo hiểm xã hội (BHXH) mất 335 giờ/năm... Nếu vi tính hóa quy trình nộp thuế, BHXH, tôi cho rằng, có những khoản, mục sẽ giảm từ 12 lần còn 1 lần; thủ tục đi làm thuế thu nhập doanh nghiệp cũng có thể giảm từ 5 lần xuống 1”, ông McGill nói.

Hay ở chỉ số tiếp cận nguồn điện, theo ông McGill, VN có quá nhiều thủ tục như xin giấy phép đào đường, xin phép cơ quan quản lý phòng cháy chữa cháy, đơn vị duyệt trạm biến thế phụ… Đó là những thủ tục không cần thiết ở hầu hết các nước khác. Vì khi xin giấy phép xây dựng thì cơ quan cấp phép sẽ có trách nhiệm lo các thủ tục. “Trong 5 thủ tục của chỉ số tiếp cận nguồn điện theo tôi có thể bỏ đi 3. Thời gian làm thủ tục này từ 115 ngày có thể giảm xuống còn 40 ngày, nhờ đó thứ hạng của VN về chỉ số này đang từ 146/189 có thể lên được 43/189”, ông McGill phân tích.

Cải cách không khó nếu quyết tâm

Đó là nhận định của ông Olin McGill. Theo ông, nhờ sự kiên trì, quyết liệt cải cách, Malaysia, Gruzia đã có những thay đổi ngoạn mục trên bảng xếp hạng cạnh tranh (Malaysia từ thứ hạng 28 năm 2006 đã lên thứ hạng 6/189, Gruzia từ vị trí 112 năm 2006 đã lên hạng 8/189) đạt mức tăng trưởng kinh tế rõ rệt trong những năm qua.

Theo TS Nguyễn Đình Cung, nhiều hạn chế nền kinh tế đã không được nhìn nhận đúng nguyên nhân là do quản lý yếu kém mà lại được giải thích quanh co bằng các lý do khác không xác đáng cũng là nguyên nhân làm chậm cải cách. Đại diện Tổng cục Hải quan thì nêu một khó khăn là thu nhập của cán bộ ngành hải quan còn thấp dù đã nâng lên 2 lần. Vấn đề này được ông Olin McGill đồng tình. “Để cải cách, ở nhiều nước, ví dụ như Malaysia, New Zealand, Canada… họ có chính sách cải thiện thu nhập, lương bổng của cán bộ, công chức đồng thời có chính sách, quy trình rõ ràng để phát hiện những cán bộ, công chức không trung thực để phạt, sa thải ra khỏi bộ máy”, ông Olin McGill nói.

Sắp tới, CIEM sẽ tiến hành thêm nhiều hội thảo, tọa đàm khác sâu hơn về từng chủ đề: nộp thuế, tiếp cận điện… để tổng hợp các ý kiến, đề xuất, trình cơ quan có thẩm quyền để ban hành các chính sách, quyết định cụ thể, xử lý từng vấn đề để cải thiện môi trường kinh doanh.

Mạnh Quân

>> Làm ruộng ở quê tôi thu nhập đầu người chỉ được 25 ngàn đồng/tháng
>> VN lên kế hoạch thu nhập bình quân đầu người đạt 2.100 USD vào năm 2015
>> Năm 2009, thu nhập bình quân đầu người Hà Nội trên 1.700 USD
>> 5 năm, thu nhập bình quân đầu người tăng 70,7%
 
.
Thursday, July 24, 2014
Ho Chi Minh City awards metro contract
Written by David Briginshaw

THE Management Authority for Urban Railways (Maur) in Ho Chi Minh City has awarded a contract to the Shimizu Maeda Joint Operation, Japan, to construct a section of the city's first metro line.

The Yen 23.7bn ($US 232m) contract is for Package 1B of a 2.6km underground section of Line 1 between Ben Thanh Market and Ba Son Shipyard. Package 1B comprises the section from Opera House to Ba Son Shipyard, which is nearly 2km long and includes the construction of a four-level station to a depth of 40m at Opera House. Work is expected to start in August and will take 56 months to complete.
The design of Ben Thanh Market station is being revised but should be completed soon to allow the contract for Package 1A from there to Opera House to be awarded before the end of the year.

Construction of the17km elevated section between Ba Son and Suoi Tien is already underway following the award of a contract to the Sumitomo Cienco 6 joint venture in August 2012.

The total cost of the project is $US 2.5bn, of which 88% is being funded by Japan.

Test running on the entire 19.7km line is expected to start in 2019 with opening scheduled for 2020.
 
.
Intel markets first ‘Made-in-Vietnam’ CPU Haswell
(VOV) - Intel Products Vietnam on July 29 launched its first CPU Haswell manufactured at HCM City-based assembly and testing plant.

The plant is not only the first semiconductor facility in Vietnam but manufactures Intel’s central processing units (CPU) with the brand Haswell expecting to account for 80% of the global market share.

Intel%20CPU%20Haswell.jpg

Intel announced the release of CPU Haswell made in Vietnam on July 29 (Photo:VGP)
Sherry Boger, General Manager of Intel Products Vietnam, said the Haswell debut was an event of great significance for Intel, and the HCM City plant is on track to meet its set targets, contributing to the group’s assembly and testing capacity globally.

Vietnam is currently an attractive investment destination for foreign businesses, including Intel in particular, she said, adding Intel has received great support from relevant Vietnamese agencies since the project got off the ground.

Intel Products Vietnam was initially designed to manufacture chipsets for laptops and mobile devices. It later launched Atom SoC (System on a Chip) in late 2013 and now CPU Haswell.
 
Last edited:
. .
Back
Top Bottom