What's new

US, UK begin to treat India as equal

CONNAN

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
3,381
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
United States
The 2015 Republic Day parade was a global event. Rarely an event or a visit to India draws such attention of the western media. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Barack Obama made it to the headlines all over. It promises to the recession-hit world – not just the two countries – a change.

Possibly the only other visit that had drawn such mileage was the visit of Soviet Prime Minister Alexei Kosygin at the 1968 Republic Day. It was three years before the historic 25-year treaty with the Soviet Union and the war for liberation of Bangladesh in 1971. Kosygin visit was a media event in the US and Europe, as it came shortly after the 1965 Indo-Pak war that saw the triumph of Soviet system owned by India over state-of-the-art US Patton tanks deployed by Pakistan.

The other supposedly significant Republic Day visits of UK Queen Elizabeth II in 1963, UK Prime Minister John Major in 1993, South African President Nelson Mandela in 1995, Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2007 and Shinzo Abe in 2014 had caused some ripples but mostly in localized terms. Putin certainly reminded the days of Kosygin, but it did not raise waves that Kosygin visit had caused.

Kosygin visit changed the geo-politic. Will Obama visit also change the course of the world? The US and the UK media expect a lot. India might change the fortune of the US energy and nuclear industry, create jobs and even may bring good luck to the sinking UK economy, the western media hopes.

That is the change apparently Prime Minister Narendra Modi has brought. The mighty US (yes, it remains so till now) and fledgling UK have started viewing India as almost equal. They see a rising India as insurance for their progress despite significant difference in the level of wealth they possess through control of the global system.

They are hopeful that $4 billion investment promised by Obama to pep up solar, nuclear, defence and allied industries would generate more jobs in the US. Their major gain is seen to be in ‘Making in India’ the equipment for generating 1 gigawatt (1 lakh megawatt) solar power and almost 60,000 mw of wind power. If it succeeds, it may change the dynamics of world energy. No country, not even China with its initial success, has set such an ambitious solar power target in a short period of about five years.

It may also end the charm of the nuclear energy, which is neither cheap nor clean. If solar succeeds, which in all probability it should, the thawing of nuclear power projects is a great possibility.

Those accusing Modi of resuscitating the gasping nuclear industry in the US and Europe, possibly may end up praising him for causing its likely end.

Indian technological development needs are likely to be taken care of by the US. But some concerns remain. The US had earlier dumped on India not only junk technologies but even junk food like PL 480 wheat.

While fears always remain in global politics and trade, it is also a fact that over the past three years, between 2011 and 2014, the US surpassed Russia as the largest supplier of military equipment to India. It is possibly an indicator that both sides are overcoming their mutual suspicions.

Obama banks heavily on India for creating jobs by setting a target of rise in trade from the $ 100 billion ($ 96 billion in reality) to $500 billion. But does he want to reduce his ties with China with which even today it has $560 billion trade? May be. It creates more jobs in China. Obama wants a shift in that paradigm!


The US industry is concerned about IPR issues in India, its core sector and infrastructure growth and retrospective taxation uncertainties. Modi has tried to dispel these by saying: “We will guide you and walk with you in projects. You will find a climate that encourages investment and rewards enterprise. It will nurture innovation and protect your intellectual property. It will make easy to do business.”

India is opening up its doors. But the US is still not that open. Despite the Obama sops, it is not a total free entry for Indian goods to the US.

India need not be euphoric despite Obama saying he wanted to see more trade between the two countries. He also says: “Modi and I are interested in ‘smart’ regulation”. Thus it would be a regulated entry to the US market for India though the US wants a free walk.

Despite some normal apprehension as was also in the follow-up of Kosygin visit, Obama-Modi talks instill confidence for boosting the world economy.

US And UK Begin To Treat India As Equal - The Hans India
 
.
Apologies but I see alot of Indian companies taking Billions in revenue out to India

Have not see any US workers moving to India
 
.
That is the change apparently Prime Minister Narendra Modi has brought. The mighty US (yes, it remains so till now) and fledgling UK have started viewing India as almost equal. They see a rising India as insurance for their progress despite significant difference in the level of wealth they possess through control of the global system.
No, they have not.
But give it a few decades, they will.
 
.
Apologies but I see alot of Indian companies taking Billions in revenue out to India

Have not see any US workers moving to India


Not going to happen in another 2 decades.... Yes there are people who comes and works on behalf of their companies in India, but those are short visits or short assignments (1 year may be)
 
.
Apologies but I see alot of Indian companies taking Billions in revenue out to India

Have not see any US workers moving to India
There are a lot of expats and as the intermingling between Indian and Foreign companies is increasing, their size is increasing.

But in general why would an American move out to India, a poor country.
 
.
There are a lot of expats and as the intermingling between Indian and Foreign companies is increasing, their size is increasing.

But in general why would an American move out to India, a poor country.

Soon, India would be so wealthy that white Americans would go to India to be servants.
 
.
Apologies but I see alot of Indian companies taking Billions in revenue out to India

Have not see any US workers moving to India

That's not the right way to look at it. If US workers move to work in India then we won't have needed such an arrangement. Then article talks about trade enhancement, reducing Chinese dependency on jobs and its aimed at dividing the risks by making India an equal investment partner. The west wants India as a sponge between them and east and hence the article suggests India to explore that oppertunuity
 
. .
Just as one example, Tata group alone has purchased part or entire stake in following British companies

British Salt 100%
Brunner Mond 36.5%
British Telecom's Mosaic business 100%
Tetley group 100%
Jaguar Land Rover 100%
Corus Steel 100%

Mergers and acquisitions - Tata group

No wonder "the equal treatment"
 
.
Presently US companies have contract -> Indian company takes

All jobs moved to India , so how does that benefit US economy
 
.
US ok .They are far ahead than us .There is no equality in there.But in UK .I dont.think so.We already passed that stage .TATA is now a prominent company in Britian.UK is not a concern for us.
 
.
Apologies but I see alot of Indian companies taking Billions in revenue out to India

Have not see any US workers moving to India

Have you been to India...How can you make this statement.

Come and See Gurgaon, Pune, Banglore, Madras, Chandigarh...Your Illusioions will change.
 
. . .
Presently US companies have contract -> Indian company takes

All jobs moved to India , so how does that benefit US economy
Two small points
1.Economy gain is not about only job. If foreign partners gain from their investment in India, the money they take would create many job in their home
2. The keyword is competitive, if they can compete with millions of our youth in India , and work for lower pay scale , they are welcome in India.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom