What's new

US Supreme Court lets victims' 9/11 suit vs. Saudi Arabia proceed

It might be because prior to 9/11, your country of Saudi Arabia was one of the leading nations who allowed extremists to preach in every Mosque without sanction. You funded all sort of groups to carry out your dirty 'foreign policy'.

You created a generation of monsters. This is why there are so many Saudi terrorists.

Now to give you credit, post 9/11 the Saudi regime realised that they were on the wrong track and reformed their activities - now vocally coming out against extremism.

If lawyers can show evidence that the Saudi system - whether educational or within Mosques was a contributing factor in radicalising the future hijackers - then they should sue you for all they can.

Can you actually confirm this with any sustainable evidence other than rumors or stereotypes? When were any Saudi Arabians involved in terrorism prior to 9/11?

Yes, a few hundred volunteers (some say up to 2000) went to Afghanistan 30 years ago to fight the Soviet Union alongside the Americans and Muslims from across the world.

I don't consider that terrorism at all. It was a honorable fight against an oppresive regime (Soviet Union) that killed close to 2 million Afghan civilians.

Then a few hundred went to Chechnya to prevent the Russians from doing genocide. There were no suicide bombings involved in either wars.

I doubt this to be honest but let us see.
 
In Israel prior to 9/11, we knew the funding for terrorism against us came from Iraq and Saudi - as well as other places.

You do seem to have an endless stream of them joining ISIS just now. No doubt Saudi has dabbled in Syria and Iraq recently, but I don't think you have a global Jihadi view in terms of the Saudi royals.

Your global ambitions tend to be more about aggressively pushing Islam into Europe and beyond by funding lots of Islamic centres and printing millions of free Korans.

Which is more desirable than paying people to blow shit up.

I'm giving you a backhanded compliment in a way. You can't deny the feeling and rhetoric within Saudi pre-911 contributed to radicalisation.

Well, I would like to see such sources that confirm what you say. KSA's main role in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict was solely a humanitarian and supportive role.

That's actually not correct and highly exaggerated. There are not more than 1000 Saudi Arabians in Iraq and Syria in total. Out of a population of 30 million. They have their reasons to go. It's hard to stop.

There are more Chechens alone.

Anything else would be strange for a country that is the birthplace of Islam and has the money.

Israel also supports Jewish centres across the world as the birthplace of Judaism. What is wrong with that?

That has nothing to do with pushing Islam in the face of anyone. You cannot force religion on anyone especially not in Europe. You know that. I see nothing wrong with supporting Islamic centres and printing Qur'an's for free to Muslims and people who might be interested.

I seriously never knew anyone or heard about anyone being taught what I have heard of propaganda by SOME news outlets in the West. That must have taken place privately or in some village mosques or something along those lines.

Of course I am against all that as it's not Islam.

But you have to remember that there is a religious class of importance in KSA that (some of them) have outdated views and some are outreight semi-retarded in my opinion and many other locals. But they are a dying species.
 
Prophet Muhammad: “Whosoever rushes in reaping something before it is due shall be deprived of it.”

You do realize that I was just playing along with your saying by inventing my own for the occasion? Of course nothing is certain.

@IronBeam

Yes. It's a struggle between new ideas and keeping some traditions alive.

Yes, that's correct but at long as it does not cause any problems I see no problem. I mean you cannot force religion on people anymore. That was possible in the Middle Ages. Whether in Europe or ME.

Yes, that's due to the Islamic heritage of ruling huge empires for a very long time. It's more about sentiments than actual reality.
 
funny US supreme court, there must be someone like iftikhar chaudhary there as well.. fooling the nation.
 
mqdefault (1).jpg
Maybe the US will compensate the families of these children along with hundreds of others.
 
I would only accept when USA apologises and admit it deliberately took down a civilian plane. I guess to Americans ''rag heads'' lives are not worth much is it?....

The families should sue Iran Air and the air traffic controllers for knowingly flying into a combat zone. I personally think Iran flew that plane through an ongoing battle ON PURPOSE to make those people 'martyrs' so they'd have something to whine about. Yeah, sue the mullahs and ayatollah, too !!:enjoy:
 
As you didn't apologize yourself, I can reject you as a hypocrite.
That was what I assumed. Ignored from now....

So much ego rolled into one personality.

The families should sue Iran Air and the air traffic controllers for knowingly flying into a combat zone. I personally think Iran flew that plane through an ongoing battle ON PURPOSE to make those people 'martyrs' so they'd have something to whine about. Yeah, sue the mullahs and ayatollah, too !!:enjoy:

What combat zone? Only Americans have turn the Persian Gulf into combat zone, other wise many other civilian aircraft use the route.
 
What combat zone? Only Americans have turn the Persian Gulf into combat zone, other wise many other civilian aircraft use the route.

Amongst other things, at the time the Vincennces was engaged with six Iranian attack boats when Iran Air flight flew right over. Not a bright move on the Iranians part unless they WANTED the plane to be shot down.
 
Back
Top Bottom